Charlie Kirk on the Republican Party After Trump and What It Means to Be Conservative

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk Built the World's Largest Conservative Youth Organization from a Card Table and Conviction

Charlie Kirk Built the World's Largest Conservative Youth Organization from a Card Table and Conviction

1:35:50

Donald Trump Jr. on the Most Amazing Political Comeback in American History and Why Exile Made Them Stronger

Donald Trump Jr. on the Most Amazing Political Comeback in American History and Why Exile Made Them Stronger

22:56

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Tik Tok and Young Voters Fueled Trump's Historic Comeback Victory

Charlie Kirk Reveals How Tik Tok and Young Voters Fueled Trump's Historic Comeback Victory

20:36

Charlie Kirk on the Republican Party After Trump and What It Means to Be Conservative

Charlie Kirk, founder of Turning Point USA, discusses the direction of the Republican Party and conservative movement in the Trump era. Kirk addresses the balance between fiscal conservatism and supporting President Trump, explaining his admiration for judicial appointments, deregulation, and foreign policy shifts while acknowledging concerns about the national debt. He explores how the conservative movement is redefining itself around issues like immigration, trade with China, and skepticism of endless foreign wars, arguing that Trump's presidency has created space for Republicans to reconnect with the American worker without abandoning core conservative principles.

Categories: Interviews
October 29, 2019

Turning Point USA's Multi-State Campus Tour

Charlie Kirk recently completed an ambitious multi-state campus tour that captured the energy of conservative student activism across America. The tour began at Grand Canyon University alongside Donald Trump Jr., then moved through Colorado State, Iowa, and New Hampshire before returning to Newport Beach for Turning Point USA's Western Regional Conference. The packed schedule demonstrated the grassroots momentum of conservative organizing on college campuses nationwide.

Kirk also participated in a debate in Nashville against Kyle Kulinski, where the central question would be whether President Trump has made America great again. Kirk anticipated that getting his opponent to acknowledge even marginal improvements in America's condition over the previous two and a half years would prove challenging, given their differing political perspectives.

The Relationship Between Turning Point USA and the Trump Administration

Kirk clarified the organizational structure connecting Turning Point USA to the Trump administration. The organization operates a 501(c)(4) called Students for Trump that openly supports the president, while maintaining a separate 501(c)(3) educational arm that conducts events, including many at the White House, while staying disciplined on educational messaging.

At the core of Kirk's educational mission is a foundational belief that he shares at every speech: America is the greatest country ever to exist in the history of the world. From that perspective, Kirk argues that citizens should want to defend, restore, and revitalize America when it's heading in the wrong direction. His personal argument centers on the claim that President Trump has successfully revitalized America, though pressing challenges remain.

Reconciling Fiscal Conservatism with Support for Trump

Kirk openly addressed one of the most significant tensions in his political worldview: how to simultaneously admire Senator Rand Paul's fiscal conservatism while supporting President Trump, despite the administration's contribution to the national debt. Kirk identified the trillion-dollar debt as one of the most pressing unaddressed challenges facing the nation, describing himself as a fiscal hawk and Rand Paul supporter.

However, Kirk then outlined the numerous Trump achievements that earn his support. He praised the appointments of Supreme Court Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh, along with 150 Circuit Court judges who represent one of the longest-lasting successes of the Trump presidency. Kirk also celebrated the tax cut bill, deregulation efforts, and the administration's appreciation for American entrepreneurs and free enterprise.

On foreign policy, Kirk expressed enthusiasm for Trump's more restrained approach and reconsideration of foreign occupations. He argued that conservatives made their national brand under Obama by focusing on debt and deficit, and while Trump has submitted budgets that would eventually balance, Congress has thrown those proposals out. Kirk suggested that Trump recognizes the fiscal challenge even if legislative progress has been limited.

Immigration and Trade: The Core of Trump's Appeal

Kirk agreed that voters in 2016 primarily wanted less immigration and better trade deals, distinguishing Trump's campaign from Mitt Romney's unsuccessful 2012 run. Kirk supported less illegal immigration and reducing chain migration and visa lottery programs, arguing that Trump's victory was multifaceted but could be partially explained by voter fatigue with the Bush and Clinton political dynasties.

Trump's message of disrupting the system resonated with districts that hadn't voted Republican in years, including areas in southern Colorado and northern New Mexico. Kirk credited Trump with renegotiating trade deals and fundamentally reorienting American policy toward China, calling it one of the longest-lasting and most significant accomplishments of the presidency.

Kirk identified China as the number one enemy of the United States and praised Trump's willingness to address Chinese economic aggression. He noted that southern border apprehensions had finally declined to around 57,000 people, attributing the progress to Trump's asymmetrical approach, including threatening tariffs on Mexico to secure cooperation on border enforcement. Kirk positioned himself as more hawkish on immigration than Rand Paul, closer to Senator Tom Cotton's positions, while aligning with Paul on reducing the size and scope of government.

The Legacy of Trump's Disruptive Presidency

Kirk characterized the Trump presidency as fundamentally disruptive, with unprecedented economic success and a willingness to reconsider endless foreign wars. He criticized what he saw as a bipartisan agreement to occupy every country that challenged American interests, calling this approach wrong. The elimination of ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi demonstrated that large foreign occupation forces weren't necessary to target enemies who threaten American security.

Beyond foreign policy and economics, Kirk repeatedly emphasized the significance of judicial appointments. The installation of 150 impartial judges, along with Gorsuch and Kavanaugh on the Supreme Court, represented a transformation of the federal judiciary that would outlast the Trump administration by decades.

The Future of Conservatism After Trump

Looking beyond the Trump presidency, assuming a second-term victory, Kirk expressed optimism about the future direction of the conservative movement. He suggested that Trump has created intellectual space and permission for conservatives to avoid declaring war on every country that challenges America, moving away from automatic support for regime change.

Kirk noted that Trump had been highly critical of John Bolton's Libya strategy, which Kirk called one of the worst decisions in recent U.S. history. While acknowledging that Muammar Qaddafi was a horrible dictator, Kirk pointed out that his removal created an ISIS power vacuum in Libya. This skepticism toward military intervention aligned with core conservative principles of limited government and restricted government spending, since the war machine represents a major component of government expansion.

Kirk also identified a positive Trump legacy in reconnecting Republicans with the American worker. He argued that the technocratic approach of Mitt Romney and George H.W. Bush, focusing exclusively on supply-side economics discussed at elite venues like the Manhattan Economic Club, failed to resonate with voters in Iowa and Colorado. While identifying as a free trade supporter himself, Kirk acknowledged that middle America has experienced a genuine squeeze, with power and wealth centers shifting to Washington D.C., where the richest counties in America now cluster.

Balancing Free Trade Principles with Economic Nationalism

Kirk attempted to reconcile his free trade instincts with support for Trump's trade policies by pointing to legitimate grievances against China. He argued that China has deliberately dumped products into American markets, stolen intellectual property, and waged economic war against the United States for an extended period. Kirk expressed hope that the new China deal would reflect some form of equilibrium allowing American companies to sell their products and giving American workers a fair shot at competing.

This balancing act represented the broader tension within the conservative movement between traditional free market principles and growing recognition that completely free trade had produced winners and losers in ways that damaged American communities. Kirk suggested that conservative intellectuals needed to grapple with these realities rather than reflexively defending abstract economic principles without considering their real-world impacts on American families and communities.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!