Up Next
Tim Dillon and Max Blumenthal Reveal Charlie Kirk's Growing Skepticism Toward Israel and Donor Pressures Before His Death
36:42
George Galloway Examines Israeli Motive in Charlie Kirk Assassination Amid Growing Conservative Shift on Israel
38:00
Charlie Kirk's Own Words on Israel: Reflecting on His Moral Stand and Tragic Loss
20:16
Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu Reveals Deep Concerns About Israel Losing Conservative Support
Charlie Kirk penned a detailed letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warning that Israel is losing support even in conservative MAGA circles, calling it a "five alarm fire." The letter, sent on May 2nd and obtained by the New York Post, laid out Kirk's concerns about Israel's failing information war on social media and offered specific recommendations for a communications overhaul. Kirk expressed frustration that he spends half his campus tour time defending Israel while the Israeli government remains largely silent, and he questioned whether young conservatives should trust Israeli intelligence after being lied to about COVID vaccines and WMDs in Iraq.
The Letter Goes Public
The New York Post obtained an exclusive copy of a letter Charlie Kirk sent to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on May 2nd. The lengthy correspondence reveals Kirk's deep concerns about Israel's declining support among young conservatives and offers a comprehensive roadmap for improving Israel's communications strategy. The letter has become a focal point of discussion as people attempt to understand Kirk's legacy and final thoughts before his death.
Benjamin Netanyahu first referenced the letter in a video address following Kirk's death. In the emotional tribute, Netanyahu said: "He wrote me a letter on May 2nd this year. He said, 'One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization.' A few weeks before the tragedy, I called him and I spoke to him and I said, 'Please come to Israel.' I invited him to Israel. And sadly, that visit will not take place."
A Five Alarm Fire
Kirk opened the letter by expressing his love for Israel and the Jewish people, explaining that advocating for Israel has been one of his greatest joys as a Christian. He mentioned taking over Ambassador Huckabee's show on TBN where he continually supports Israel and the Jewish people. However, Kirk did not mince words about the severity of the situation.
"I regret to report that anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends are at record levels on social media," Kirk wrote. "These negative sentiments then flow downstream into college campuses and even seep into the conservative MAGA community. My team and I have spent months analyzing these trends and debating ideas that could help you and your country push back against these disturbing developments."
Kirk emphasized that he was writing from "a place of deep love for Israel and the Jewish people," but felt it was important to be "brutally honest with those you love." His central thesis: "In my opinion, Israel is losing the information war and needs a communications intervention."
Campus Questions and Hostile Sentiment
Kirk detailed his experiences on college campuses, where he regularly draws crowds of 4,000 to 5,000 students in what he described as "rock concert atmosphere filled with conservative patriots." Despite the conservative makeup of these audiences, Kirk found himself constantly confronted with hostile questions about Israel.
The questions he regularly faced included: Is Israel an apartheid state? Why does Israel conduct ethnic cleansing? Why is America subsidizing Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people? Is American aid helping to subsidize Israel's free healthcare? Are Israel and Jews running US foreign policy? Were Israel and Jews responsible for 9/11? Is defending Israel in our US national interest? Why is Israel trying to drag us into a war with the Middle East?
"I'm accused of being a paid apologist for Israel when I defend her," Kirk explained. "However, if I don't defend Israel strongly enough, I'm accused of being anti-Semitic. I know you've got a seven-front war and my caviling pales in comparison, but I'm trying to convey to you that Israel is losing support even in conservative circles. This should be a five alarm fire."
Kirk cited a Harvard Harris poll showing 48% of 18 to 24-year-old Americans support Hamas over Israel, and noted that even in young MAGA circles, Israel is losing support. He expressed frustration that he often spends half his time on campus tours defending Israel when the Israeli government itself remains largely silent.
The Easter Incident
Kirk recounted a specific incident that prompted him to begin composing the letter. On Easter, instead of focusing on his family, he was "getting bombarded with messages about the Israeli army making it difficult for Christians to access church in Jerusalem on Easter." He saw no official statements from Israel pushing back on this narrative.
"It was frustrating because pro-Israel surrogates like me should not be in charge of fact-checking every piece of anti-Israel misinformation that pours into social media," Kirk wrote. "Sometimes it feels like I'm defending Israel in public more than your own government."
Stop Subcontracting the Information War
A recurring theme throughout Kirk's letter was his frustration that Israel relies too heavily on American surrogates to fight its information battles. "I strongly suggest Israel not always depend on subcontracting their information war efforts to surrogates in America," he wrote.
Kirk made the comparison to Israel's military strategy: "Israel never asks for American troops because Israel does its own fighting. I suggest the same approach for the information war. You lead and people like me will follow and provide supplemental support."
He questioned whether Israel even has a press secretary comparable to Karoline Leavitt or defenders like Stephen Miller who battle the press every day for President Trump. "Honestly, I don't even know if you have a press secretary," Kirk admitted. "You are an eloquent defender of Israel, but you need a team of information warriors out there pushing back every day in real time. When you don't push back, anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda fill the void."
Specific Recommendations
Kirk offered detailed recommendations for improving Israel's communications strategy. First, he suggested creating a rapid response media team modeled after President Trump's approach. "President Trump does this very effectively on social media with his own account and the White House rapid response team," Kirk noted.
He proposed creating an "Israel Truth Network" (ITN) that would include social media channels and a one-stop source of information website where negative claims about Israel could be thoroughly debunked. The website could include links to books, podcasts, media personalities, and pro-Israel thought leaders, and could serve as a conduit to groups and educators like Dennis Prager.
Kirk suggested inviting released hostages to go on a speaking tour in the United States. "These hostages can talk about how Gazan civilians not once offered any empathy or compassion," he wrote, noting that Trump had effectively used this messaging when released hostages visited the Oval Office.
He also recommended interviewing regular Israelis on the streets, creating what could become an entire social media campaign. "Ask them what they love about their country. Interview Jews, Israeli Arabs, Orthodox, secular, etc. Ask Israelis what do they wish the world knew about Israel. Ask them to respond to examples of misinformation on social media."
Show, Don't Just Tell
Kirk emphasized the importance of demonstrating Israel's values through action rather than just asserting them. "Why not show how your hospitals take care of wounded terrorists? Why not show clips of Israel dropping flyers from airplanes, warning Gazan civilians to stay out of harm's way?" he asked.
He suggested Israel could send a plane with the Star of David full of supplies to help Americans after natural disasters like hurricanes. He asked whether Israel has offered assistance to the United States with border technology or missile defense shield technology. "These are examples of effective messaging showing Israel as a close ally rather than just saying it," Kirk explained.
"Consumers of social media are aware of the billions in supplies we send to Israel, but they're less aware of what America gets in return," Kirk wrote. "You and your team need to make the argument on social media that Israel is a great friend of America and is vital to US national security."
Trust and Credibility Issues
In one of the letter's most striking passages, Kirk addressed the credibility problems Israel faces with younger conservatives who have been repeatedly lied to by government institutions.
"Among the many conservatives who support Israel, there is a concern that America could become entangled in a quagmire," Kirk wrote. "My generation grew up with disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq. We were promised there would be WMDs in Iraq, and that proved to be a lie. Our generation was also lied to by the governments of Israel and the US that COVID vaccines were safe and effective."
Kirk noted that Israeli intelligence missed October 7th, and he had asked on the Patrick Bet-David podcast if there was a stand-down order. "But we're asked to trust Israeli intelligence 100% that Iran is on the cusp of obtaining nuclear weapons," he wrote. "Young conservatives are very skeptical of government proclamations. We don't fully trust intelligence assessments."
He expressed concern that while many agree Iran should not get nuclear weapons, there is shared concern that America will get sucked into another endless war costing thousands of American lives. "Where are the Israelis who are arguing their case to win over public opinion?" Kirk asked.
Think Like a Political Campaign
Kirk urged Netanyahu to think of Israel as a political candidate running for office. "In this case, a younger woman who grew up on social media," he suggested. "Who is this candidate and what does she stand for? Right now, there's essentially a massive negative ad campaign spreading on social media. These negative ads are defining this candidate."
He argued that like any political campaign, the first task is to define the candidate. "Right now, there is not a one-stop shopping resource where younger people can learn about this candidate. Every candidate has a website and social media. It would be political malpractice to omit these tools."
Kirk was blunt in his assessment: "Sorry for the brutal honesty, but Israel's approach to social media is PR malpractice." He suggested Israel should list all the toughest questions on a website with detailed expert responses and footnotes, making these responses part of Israel's platform where positions and values are explained.
First Person vs. Third Person Voice
Kirk identified a fundamental problem with Israel's current approach: "One of Israel's biggest, most fundamental problems is typically your push back is in the third person voice. I do the third person voice all the time as I attempt to defend the candidate Israel, but I don't live in Israel. So I'm more like an attorney defending a client. Israel, the client, needs to defend itself."
He expressed frustration at the lack of Israeli voices in the media. "I can't remember the last time I saw an Israeli spokesperson on one of the evening Fox shows other than yourself," Kirk told Netanyahu. "Israel needs more first person voices to defend her. How can Israel defend and define itself if you don't even have a spokesperson out there fighting back every day?"
The Power of Social Media
Kirk acknowledged that some might dismiss social media, especially TikTok, as a waste of time, but he made a compelling case for its importance. "I have increased my followers on TikTok from approximately 1 million to 6.6 million in the last year. We get billions with a B views on TikTok. My campus tour last fall and spring have received approximately 5 billion impressions."
He noted that Elon Musk is a good friend to Israel, so X offers a great opportunity to make inroads on social media. Kirk warned that Israel should not sit back and allow its enemies to define her, citing a Pew Research poll showing 53% of Americans now have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 42% three years ago.
"I understand social media as well as anyone in the world," Kirk wrote confidently. "From my vantage point, Israel has retreated from social media without a fight. How are you going to win over younger generations if you're starting out in retreat on social media? Younger generations use their TVs for Netflix, not the evening news. Narratives for younger and even middle-aged people are fought now on social media."
Budget and Resources
Kirk acknowledged that Israel has increased its Hasbara budget by 20 times, which he called great news. He suggested that some of this money, along with hundreds of millions of dollars raised by private pro-Israel groups, should be directed into creating pro-Israel original homegrown content and promoting it on Israel-operated social media channels and websites.
He recommended reshaping the Hasbara department into more of a political campaign headquarters with campaign narrative experts, which could serve as the mothership hosting the Israel Truth Network. "Majority of staff in these efforts should be in their 20s and 30s," Kirk advised. "The older generation alone is not going to win the information war on social media. You need to fill the ranks with young people who grew up with cell phones and social media, not pay phones and TV news."
Outdated Communication Methods
Kirk criticized Israel's outdated approach to media. "I've seen your IDF spokesman defend Israel standing at a dimly lit podium. It looks like a scene out of the 1970s, like some old Walter Cronkite clips of TV news," he wrote. "You need to tear down your old ways of communicating and start over from scratch."
He also noted that Netanyahu himself doesn't post very often on social media, and many of his clips are in Hebrew only. "Why don't you do more press conferences in Israel in English? Take on some of the tough questions I get bombarded with on college campuses. Where are all the Israeli surrogates?"
The Stakes
Kirk concluded his letter by emphasizing the high stakes involved. "Israel is the Silicon Valley of the Middle East, and Israel has an abundance of brain power and technological expertise. The question is whether Israel has the willpower to step up its game in this information war. From my vantage point, the status quo is not working. Israel is getting crushed on social media."
He warned that Israel is losing younger generations of Americans, even among MAGA conservatives. "In my opinion, you are losing the information war, which will eventually translate into less political and military support from America."
"The Holy Land is so important to my life, and it pains me to see support for Israel slip away," Kirk wrote. "Feel free to contact me on my private number below if you would like to discuss this further."
The Letter's Release and Reaction
The letter was obtained by the New York Post through Josh Christenson and David Proper, though the exact source of the letter remains unclear. Netanyahu had first mentioned the letter in a video address following Kirk's death, which sparked calls from various figures, including Candace Owens, for the letter to be released. Some had claimed Kirk was being blackmailed into making firm defenses of Israel.
The release of the letter is likely to generate reactions from multiple sides. Some will point to it as evidence of Kirk's love for Israel and commitment to the Jewish people. Others will highlight his criticisms and questions, noting that he wanted clarity on vital interests, expressed concerns about trust in Israeli intelligence, and acknowledged that his generation was lied to by both US and Israeli governments about COVID vaccines.
Regardless of one's position on Israel and Palestine, the letter reveals Charlie Kirk as a deep thinker who approached complex issues with nuance and genuine concern. He was willing to ask difficult questions while maintaining relationships and expressing love for those he challenged. The letter stands as a testament to Kirk's thoughtful approach to one of the most divisive issues in American politics.
Video Transcript
He said, "One of my greatest joys as a
Christian is advocating for Israel and
forming alliances to defend
Judeo-Christian civilization.
>> What I'm trying to convey to you that
Israel is losing support, even in
conservative circles. This should be a
five alarm fire. Our generation was also
lied to by the governments of Israel and
the US that co vaccines were safe and
effective." Wow. So, he's saying that
Israel and their government lied to the
world. Charlie's letter now released.
The New York Post got their hands on it
as an exclusive and they posted the
whole item here for us to read and we'll
do so. We've got it queued up here. It
comes from the desk of Charlie Kirk over
to the prime minister. And there's a lot
of details in here about what Charlie
was thinking Israel should be doing. And
so you can see sign here by the late and
great Charlie Kirk. The letter
apparently was sent back on May 2nd. And
we've been talking a lot about this. In
fact, a lot of people have been asking
for this letter to be released because
people are trying to of course figure
out what Charlie was thinking in the
final days, what his legacy is and will
be. And a lot of people are saying that
they know what it was and what it is and
you know what his intentions were for
the future and people are trying to
understand what's going to happen with
Turning Point, a massive organization
that obviously carries a lot of
political heft in America. And so a lot
of duking it out over this letter
specifically. Some people saying that
Benjamin Netanyahu was misrepresenting
the letter and there were calls for him
to release it. It has now been released.
I don't know if he officially gave it to
them or not, but here is what is inside.
This comes over from Josh Christensen
and David Proper. They say that we got
the letter obtained by the post. Kirk
wrote to Netanyahu in a May 2 missive
that he was alarmed. He actually called
it a five alarm fire. Here's a photo of
Charlie, looks like over in Israel. And
Netanyahu first mentioned the video in a
September 18th video address 8 days
after Kirk was shot. And I'm not sure if
that's accurate or not. I don't know
when this came out, but this guy posted
this on September 11th. And we
definitely know that Netanyahu made a
video about this, but I think he was
also on like immediately in the
aftermath talking about this. So, I
don't think it was 8 days after. I think
he mentioned it right here. And this
video was posted on September 11th, one
day after Charlie Kirk was shot and
killed. And so this is where I first
heard of it from the prime minister. And
here's what he said immediately after
Charlie's death.
>> Minister, you have your own memories of
Charlie Kirk. Please share them.
>> Well, Harris, before I do that, I have
to say that we're just heartbroken.
Myself, my wife, my family, my son
actually, and his 2019 visit to Israel.
Had lunch with him and his wife Erica.
We're shattered first as human beings
because a great human being has been
taken from us. He's was an extraordinary
friend. You know, he said he wrote me a
letter on May 2nd this year. He said,
"One of my greatest joys as a Christian
is advocating for Israel and forming
alliances to defend Judeo-Christian
civilization." A few weeks before the
tragedy yesterday, I called him and I
spoke to him and I said, "Please come to
Israel." I invited him to Israel. And
sadly, that visit will not take place.
But he was he was a defender of our
common Judeo-Christian civilization. He
was unbelievably excited to walk in the
footsteps of Jesus here. He valued our
bond, the bond between America and
Israel. You know, he did so many things
to defend free speech. He had his truth.
He stood up for it, but he said, "You
can come and debate me." He invited that
debate.
>> Yeah. And they shot him in the neck. So,
I think that was the first instance of
this. And that was on September 11th is
when we saw that being posted. And he
referenced the May 2nd letter. That's
the same letter that they're saying that
they got their hands on. And again, we
don't really know the source of it. It
doesn't look like they're going to tell
us much on it. Like, where'd they get it
from? Did it come from the Israelis? Did
it come from Charlie's people? Did it
come from, you know, an anonymous
source? He first mentioned the video,
the letter in September 18th video, 8
days, but I don't think that's right. I
think that he said it earlier.
Right-wing pundit Candace Owens and
others have claimed that Kirk was being
blackmailed into making firm defenses of
Israel and Persing Square also published
text messages about it. In the letter,
Kirk urged Netanyahu to stop
subcontracting things out. Lots of
quotes from it, but again, don't really
know where the letter came from.
Finally, he spurred the Israelis to
cultivate more firstperson
conversations. And of course, we know we
had the Tyler Robinson hearing. So,
that's the background on it. Here is
what the letter says. From the desk of
Charlie Kirk, written May 2nd, 2025, he
says, "Dear Mr. Prime Minister Benjamin
Netanyahu, one of my greatest joys as a
Christian is advocating for Israel and
forming alliances with Jews in the fight
to protect Judeo-Christian civilization.
More recently, I am proud to have taken
over Ambassador Huckabe's show on TBN,
where we continually support Israel and
the Jewish people. As
spreads into Western societies, it's
critical that Jews and Christians stay
united in the effort to contain and roll
back radical Islam and Sharia law.
Charlie writes, "I regret to report that
anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends are
at record levels on social media. These
negative sentiments then flow downstream
into college campuses and even seep into
the conservative MAGA community. My team
and I, right, have spent months
analyzing these trends and debating
ideas that could help you and your
country push back against these
disturbing developments. Anti-Israel
sentiment can undermine American support
for Israel. The purpose of this letter
is to lay out our concerns and outline
potential remedies. Everything written
here is from a place of deep love for
Israel and the Jewish people. I think
it's important to be brutally honest
with those you love. In my opinion,
Israel is losing the information war and
needs a communications intervention. He
says, "I started to compose this letter
to you on Easter. I should have been
focused on my family, but I was getting
bombarded with messages about the
Israeli army making it difficult for
Christians to access church in Jerusalem
on Easter." At the time, I did not see
any official statements pushing back on
this narrative. It was frustrating
because pro-Israel surrogates like me
should not be in charge of fact-checking
every piece of anti-Israel
misinformation that pours into social
media. It wasn't just Easter. On my
recent campus tours, half the questions
I get are about Israel, and they're all
negative. I often spend half my time on
these campus tours defending Jews and
Israel, which I'm proud to do because I
love Israel and love the Jewish faith. I
spent endless hours with Dennis Prager
over the year studying the Torah.
Sometimes it feels like I'm defending
Israel in public more than your own
government. My experience, says Charlie,
on college campuses matches a recent
Harvard Harris poll which reported 48%
of 18 to 24 year old Americans support
Hamas over Israel. Even in young MAGA
circles, Israel is losing support. We
are getting huge crowds of 4 to 5,000
students on some of my college tours. My
campus visits are becoming like a rock
concert atmosphere filled with
conservative patriots. Yet on these
campus visits, I'm constantly confronted
with Charlie says, I get these
questions. Israel is an apartheid state.
Why does Israel conduct ethnic
cleansing? Why is America subsidizing
Israel's genocide against the
Palestinian people? Is American aid
helping to subsidize Israel's free
healthcare? Israel and Jews are running
US foreign policy. Israel and Jews are
responsible for 9/11. Defending Israel
is not in our US national interest. And
final question is why is Israel trying
to drag us into a war with the Middle
East? Now above are just a sampling of
the negative Israel Jewish comments that
I confront on college campuses. I'm
accused of being a paid apologist for
Israel when I defend her. However, if I
don't defend Israel strongly enough, I'm
accused of being anti-Semitic. I know
you've got a sevenf frontont war and my
caveting pales in comparison, but I'm
trying to convey to you that Israel is
losing support even in conservative
circles. This should be a five alarm
fire, says Charlie Kirk. I'm often
asked, why is killing so many innocent
civilians in Gaza? I know Israel goes to
great length by dropping flyers and even
calling civilians to clear out of areas
about to be bombed. I know Israel posts
maps showing which areas should be
evacuated. I know that Hamas uses
civilians as human shields, but 90% of
the younger generations get their news
from social media and podcast. And there
is very little push back or
fact-checking by the Israeli government
andor pro-Israel supporters in the
media, especially social media. I
strongly suggest Israel not always
depend on subcontracting their
information war efforts to surrogates in
America. Mr. Prime Minister Benjamin, I
urge you to revamp your efforts and your
information warfare strategy from top to
bottom. Sometimes the impression is
given that Israel thinks everyone hates
them. So why care about winning over
hearts and minds? And I had that same
question earlier. I thought, yeah, maybe
they don't care so much about what the
world thinks, right? If the UN walks
out, if you know, UK, France, Canada, a
lot of the Western allies in the Western
world are all pushing back against them,
maybe they don't care. Maybe it's
because they think from their
perspective they're in an existential
crisis and so public opinion be damned.
But it is an open question. If there's
any truth to this impression, I urge you
to consider that social media and
podcast is where you fight for the
hearts and minds of the younger
generation. Obviously, all this negative
Israel propaganda on social media easily
translates into pro- Hamas, free
Palestine sentiment on many college
campuses. So, here are some unsolicited
recommendations my team, Charlie and I,
suggest if you're open-minded to
communications to a reset, you consider.
Here's what he says. Number one, for
starters, you need a rapid response
media team. President Trump does this
very effectively on social media with
his own account and the White House
rapid response 47 team. They are good.
The president has strong fighters like
Steven Miller and Caroline Levid who
battle the press every day. Honestly, I
don't even know if you have a press
secretary, Ben. You are an eloquent
defender of Israel, but you need a team
of information warriors out there
pushing back every day in real time.
When you don't push back, anti-semitism
and anti-Israel propaganda fill the
void. A pro-Israel friend recently asked
me, "Do Israelis even care how the world
perceives their country?" I asked the
same thing. Maybe they don't. Again,
maybe from their perspective, it's
existential. So, public opinion versus
the survival of your people. You know,
one takes a lot higher precedent than
the other. I strongly recommend putting
together a team of pro-Israel experts
who can fact check misinformation in
real time from Israel. Israel needs to
take the lead in this effort. No more
dependence on subcontractors. Israel
never asks for the American troops
because Israel does its own fighting. I
suggest the same approach for the
information war. You lead and people
like me will follow and provide
supplemental support. If you're open to
revamping your communication strategy,
my team and I are happy to assist. So,
they just have ineffective messengers
perhaps is what Charlie's saying. You
need something perhaps like an Israel
Truth Network, the ITN, which can
include social media channels and a
one-stop source of information website
where, for example, all the negative
Israel questions I can get can be
thoroughly debunked. I would love to
refer students to such a website. The
website could be a conduit to groups
like Hel and Jewish educators like
Dennis Prager. There can be links to
books, podcasts, media personalities,
pro-Israel thought leaders. The website
can be a place where Judeo-Christian
leaders and groups can share information
and form closer alliances in the fight
against Islamic fundamentalism. ITN
social media can be pro-Israel, pro-Jude
Christian video clips, breaking news,
and articles. ITN could potentially be a
news aggregation site for all news
pertaining to Israel and Judeo-Christian
efforts to preserve Western
civilization. And this is interesting. I
mean, Charlie obviously was a master at
social media, right? He created virality
basically everywhere he went. He was a
pro at it. Like the Michael Jordan of
social media, very excellent at it. So
from his perspective, it's just, you
know, it's kind of domain dependence.
Like if you're very good at one thing,
you kind of I can solve it with this one
thing. It's the same concept when you go
and see a doctor. Whatever doctor you
see, they're going to find a problem
that's within their area of domain. Oh,
I don't know. I'm a kidney doctor, so
it's probably your kidneys. Oh, I'm a
liver doctor. It's probably your liver,
right? Or whatever it is. So you just go
and they find what they're looking for
essentially and fix it. So from his
perspective, this is the solution to the
problem. He says, "Have you considered
inviting some of the released hostages
to go on a speaking tour in the US? This
could be very effective messaging. These
hostages can talk about how Gazin
civilians not once offered any empathy
or compassion." Trump referenced this
lack of humanity when some released
hostages visited the Oval Office. This
was effective messaging. When impactful
messaging clicks, keep it going. Got to
double down. This format's working. Go,
go, go. All these hostages and all your
spokespersons should be arguing. It's
Hamas that's committing genocide on
their own people by using civilians as
human shields and storing weapons in
schools and hospitals, etc. That
information drips out in the regular
media but is almost non-existent on
social media. He also suggests from
Charlie, maybe interview regular
Israelis on the streets. Ask them what
they love about their country. Interview
Jews, Israeli Arabs, the Jews, Orthodox,
secular, etc. Ask Israelis what do they
wish the world knew about Israel. Ask
them to respond to examples of
misinformation on social media. And this
could be an entire social media PR
campaign called, "Dude, you got us
wrong. Interview Israelis from all walks
of life, right? Like, set up, I don't
know, put some Israelis behind a table,
you know, come talk to me. Ask me
anything. I'm an Israeli Jew. Ask me
questions about whatever you want." You
know, like Charlie Kirk, come talk to
me. Interview Israelis from all walks of
life. Let Israelis explain in their own
words how Israel is a pluralistic
society, a free country with elected
leaders, unlike all of the surrounding
authoritarian Arab nations. Why not show
how your hospitals take care of wounded
terrorists? Why not show clips of Israel
dropping flyers from airplanes, warning
Gazin civilians to stay out of harm's
way? It would have been nice to see an
Israeli plane with the Star of David
arrive in the US full of supplies after
a hurricane. It would be nice. Yeah.
Here's a question Charlie has. Has
Israel offered any assistance to the US
in so far as technology to protect our
border or with the missile defense
shield that President Trump has
discussed? And man, these are great
questions because I've had those same
questions. These are examples of
effective messaging showing Israel as a
close ally rather than just saying it.
Right? And this is a theme. If there's
anything, you know, that I would say I
might point out to Charlie and may he
rest in peace. And you know, I'm sure he
probably didn't think we'd all be
reading this letter here, but it's a
concept we talk a lot about here. It's
attraction versus promotion. And there's
a fine line between the two. And you
know, doing attractive things that
people can see will draw attention to
your cause and people will say, "Oh,
dang. That's amazing. You're doing
something great." But if you're just
promoting, promoting promoting promoting
or like castigating that's anti-semitic.
You hate Jews, you hate Jews, you hate
Jews. That's not an attractive thing.
You're actually trying to promote and
censor and that causes the opposite
effect. So show us, right? Do the
attractive things and then that will
naturally permeate through social media
is what one would hope. Consumers of
social media are aware of the billions
in supplies we send to Israel, but
they're less aware of what America gets
in return. You and your team need to
make the argument on social media that
Israel is a great friend of America and
is vital to US national security. Yeah.
And how? I don't know how. Like, how is
it vital? And why is it vital? Why
should we have another country that is
vital to our own national security?
Because vital means if you don't have
it, you're in trouble. And that's a
concern. Why do we have a gap in our own
national security such that we need to
rely on another nation? And again, I
don't care what nation it is, the Brits,
the French, the Germans, whatever. If we
have to rely on them, if it's critical,
then we have a gap in our own
intelligence. Israel needs to establish
and better portray her itself as a
member of quote team humanity. Israel
needs to establish a baseline of her
identity. To run an effective messaging
campaign, you need a clearly defined
message. This video should be homegrown
from Israel. Exactly what I was just
saying. Homegrown from Israel. Okay?
It's not promoting something. It's got
to be real. What Charlie is saying here
is authenticity. In other words, create
original content. Videos and visuals
feed social media. Keep these edited
clips under one minute. Post the best
ones on the Israel Truth Network. Don't
rely on non-Israeli social media
influencers to do this. Create them
yourselves. And influencers, surrogates
like me, can promote this original work
and refer people to your social media.
Be proactive. Take the lead. Bottom line
is Israel needs to learn to fish. Dang.
Create your own content and be more
self-reliant when it comes to your
communication strategy in the world.
Now, with point number six, Iran. Israel
could do a better job explaining the
Iranian threat. Among the many
conservatives who support Israel, there
is a concern that America could become
entangled in a quagmire. My generation
grew up with disasters in Afghanistan
and Iraq. We were promised there would
be WMDs in Iraq, and that proved to be a
lie. Our generation was also lied to by
the governments of Israel and the US
that COVID vaccines were safe and
effective. Wow. So, he's saying that
Israel and their government lied to the
world. Israel intelligence missed the
boat on October 7th. And Charlie on the
Patrick BetDavid podcast asked if there
was a standown order. But we're asked to
trust Israeli intelligence 100%. Yeah.
And they can't even tell us exactly
what's going on cuz it's national
security and classified and top secret.
That Iran is on the cusp of obtaining
nuclear weapons. Young conservatives are
very skeptical of government
proclamations. Yeah. And not so young
ones are too. We don't fully trust
intelligence assessments. Right now, it
seems like Israel is primarily relying
on Americans to make the case for
attacking Iranian nuclear sites. These
arguments get a lot of blowback in MAGA
circles. Other than you, Mr. Prime
Minister, I see very few Israelis making
their case to the media, social media or
podcast. Many agree with you, myself
included, that Iran should not get
nuclear weapons. At the same time, I
share the concern that America will get
sucked into another endless war costing
thousands of American lives. Where are
the Israelis who are arguing their case
to win over public opinion? Israel
should be making its case 24/7 on social
media, including long- for
English-speaking podcast and social
media channels and websites like the
Rapid Response Team and the ITN. He also
says a paradigm shift is needed in how
Israel presents itself to the world,
especially on social media. Perhaps the
best way to convey my thoughts here is
to think of Israel as a political
candidate. In this case, a younger woman
who grew up on social media. Who is this
candidate and what does she stand for?
Right now, there's essentially a massive
negative ad campaign spreading on social
media. These negative ads are defining
this candidate. Political campaigns face
this challenge all the time. Many of the
PR challenges Israel faces should be
looked at through the prism of a
political campaign. Like any campaign,
the first task, you got to define the
candidate. Right now, says Charlie,
there is not one, not a one-stop
shopping resource where younger people
can learn about this candidate. Every
candidate has a website and social
media. It would be political malpractice
to omit these tools. Charlie says,
"Sorry for the brutal honesty, but
Israel's approach to social media is PR
malpractice. Your candidate Israel
should list all of the toughest
questions she gets on the campaign trail
with detailed expert responses with
footnotes on her ITN website and use
social media to explain her platform on
a daily basis. These responses become
part of Miss Israel's platform where her
positions and values are explained. Like
any political campaign, you need
surrogates who can articulately promote
this candidate's platform and identity.
Right now, Israel's identity is being
fabricated by those who hate her by a
barrage of misinformation in the media,
especially social media. Fake news
becomes real news if there's not
effective push back. When a candidate is
hit with negative campaign ads, the
effective response is for the candidate
to personally respond to these attacks.
A candidate doesn't just rely on
surrogates to get the truth out. One of
Israel's biggest, most fundamental
problems is typically your push back is
in the third person voice. I do the
third person voice all the time is I
attempt to defend the candidate Israel,
but I don't live in Israel. So, I'm more
like an attorney defending a client.
Israel, the client, needs to defend
itself. I wish I had a firsterson source
of information I could reference where
students in Israel, skeptics, could
learn more about this client called
Israel. You need a one-stop shopping
resource where Israel's platform and
beliefs can be spelled out. You need
more Israeli surrogates speaking out on
behalf of their candidate. At the
moment, you have some wonderful
non-Israeli surrogates speaking on
behalf of a candidate, but has not
defined herself, especially when it
comes to social media. I know it's
common to think that social media,
especially Tik Tok, is a waste of time.
I thought a similar thing a year ago,
but Tik Tok algorithms have changed. I
have increased my followers on Tik Tok
from approximately 1 million to 6.6
million in the last year. We get
billions with a B, views on Tik Tok. My
campus tour last fall and spring have
received approximately 5 billion
impressions. Elon Musk is a good friend
to Israel, so X offers a great
opportunity to make inroads on social
media. Israel should not sit back and
allow its enemies to define her. A
recent Pew Research poll shows 53% of
Americans now have an unfavorable view
of Israel, up from 42% 3 years ago.
Yeah. And that number, I just saw a new
New York Times poll that is confirming
that that number is largely made up of
the left. The right has dropped about
10% in support of Israel from like the '
70s to the '60s, but the left has just
cratered. A recent Pew Research poll
shows it's not looking good in terms of
the trajectory. US support for Israel is
precarious right now. A new media
strategy is urgently needed. And he said
this back in May. I understand social
media as well as anyone in the world. He
does. No question. From my vantage
point, Israel has retreated from social
media without a fight. How are you going
to win over younger generations if
you're starting out in retreat on social
media? Younger generations use their TVs
for Netflix, not the evening news.
Narratives for younger and even
middle-aged people are fought now on
social media. Mr. Prime Minister, stop
this retreat. Get in the information war
fight. The front lines of this
information war are on social media.
Other than a few guerilla warfare
operations, there's very little Israel
created content. I saw that Israel has
increased its Hazbara budget by 20
times, which is great news. There's also
hundreds of millions of dollars raised
by private pro-Israel groups. Some of
this money should be directed into
creating pro-Israel original homegrown
content. Next, promote this content on
Israel operated social media channels
and website. Use some of these funds to
start the Israel Truth Network. Charlie
continues. He says, "To sum up, Prime
Minister, you should perhaps consider
reshaping your Hazbara department into
more of a political campaign
headquarters with campaign narrative
experts. Hazbara could be the mothership
hosting ITN where the messaging campaign
can be created and then distributed to
all the pro-Israel groups and thought
leaders. Majority of staff in these
efforts should be in their 20s and 30s.
The older generation alone is not going
to win the information war on social
media. You need to fill the ranks with
young people who grew up with cell
phones and social media, not payoneses
and TV news. Once the candidate is
defined with a platform backfilled with
extensive details, then allow the
political operatives to take that
platform out into social media with an
outofthe box approach. Like some of the
earlier suggestions, I've seen your IDF
spokesman defend Israel standing at a
dimly lit podium. It looks like a scene
out of the 1970s, like some old Walter
Kankite clips of the TV news. You need
to tear down your old ways of
communicating and start over from
scratch. create a communications and
social media platform that is wired to
fight back with the same fierceness and
determination as the IDF. Israel has
many Americans and some well-known
foreigners who defend Israel, which is
great, but these are third person
voices. Mr. Prime Minister, you are an
eloquent defender of Israel, but you
don't post very often on social media.
Charlie calling them out. Many of your
clips are in Hebrew only. Why don't you
do more press conferences in Israel in
English? Take on some of the tough
questions I get bombarded with on
college campuses. Where are all the
Israeli surrogates? I can't remember the
last time I saw an Israeli spokesperson
on one of the evening Fox shows other
than yourself. Israel needs more
firstperson voices to defend her. How
can Israel defend and define itself if
you don't even have a spokesperson out
there fighting back every day? Do you
have a press secretary like Carolyn Line
Levit? Do you have defenders like Steven
Miller? If not, I encourage you to go
find them. You need more Israeli
spokespersons who are effective speakers
in the media and on social media. I know
you also have a serious deep state
lawfare challenge. My team and I have
been fighting the deep state every
single day for many years. Maybe a
revamped information war strategy can
help with your internal fights as well.
Israel has enormous capabilities, such
as how you orchestrated your beeper bomb
operation. Perhaps Israel can use some
of that same ingenuity to effectively
fight the information war in the media,
especially on social media. He says,
"Israel is the Silicon Valley of the
Middle East, and Israel has an abundance
of brain power and technological
expertise. The question is whether
Israel has the willpower to step up its
game in this information war. From my
vantage point, the status quo is not
working. Israel is getting crushed on
social media. And you are losing younger
generations of Americans, even among
MAGA conservatives. In my opinion, you
are losing the information war, which
will eventually translate into less
political and military support from
America. He says, "The Holy Land is so
important to my life, and it pains me to
see support for Israel slip away. Feel
free to contact me on my private number
below if you would like to discuss this
further. Sincerely, Charlie Kirk. And
man, that is a heck of a letter and
Charlie really had a handle on social
media and I would say persuasion online
and he makes a lot of very good points
that I would like to have answers to in
particular about our alliance and the
details about the vital interests that
we have alongside each other and what
those are specifically. Now, I do think
that Charlie is on the target when he
says that it needs to be authentic and
real. It needs to be coming for them and
it needs to be, you know, genuine and
factual in a way that is easily
consumable that they can, you know,
transmit to a bunch of people. But if
it's just pure promotion and there's no
deeper explanation behind it and also
Charlie really didn't address this, but
if it's also people who are calling
Charlie anti-semitic or Megan Kelly
anti-semitic are actually what we've
seen from Megan Kelly alienating people
who are strongly aligned with Israel and
saying that people like Tucker Carlson
should not be invited to certain events
and all of those things. I think that
that is also another big fissure. In
other words, people who are already
predisposed to be aligned with Israel
are now being pushed away from Israel
because unless if you're not 100%
pro-Israel, if you're like 99 or 95% or
90% pro-Israel, for some that's not good
enough. And then the attacks come
against people and they move more
towards the other side because they're
being attacked. They believe unfairly
for having criticisms of a foreign
government. So now, you know, we'll see
where this goes. But the letter has been
released and I'm sure both sides will
declare victory on it. I'm sure many
people will say, "See, we told you
Charlie loves Israel." And then other
people will come back and say, "Well,
see, Charlie had questions for Israel or
had, you know, some things that he
wanted to be clarified and he was
hinting that things were on a downward
trajectory and he wanted to reverse that
and that we need answers on a lot of
things." So, we'll of course keep our
eye on this one, see what the reaction
looks like, but this came from the desk
of Charlie Kirk. And regardless of your
position on Israel or Palestine or
wherever you stand on it, I think we can
agree that Charlie Kirk was a deep
thinker, a very wise man well beyond his
years. And we lost a really great person
in