Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu Reveals Deep Concerns About Israel Losing Conservative Support

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Tim Dillon and Max Blumenthal Reveal Charlie Kirk's Growing Skepticism Toward Israel and Donor Pressures Before His Death

Tim Dillon and Max Blumenthal Reveal Charlie Kirk's Growing Skepticism Toward Israel and Donor Pressures Before His Death

36:42

George Galloway Examines Israeli Motive in Charlie Kirk Assassination Amid Growing Conservative Shift on Israel

George Galloway Examines Israeli Motive in Charlie Kirk Assassination Amid Growing Conservative Shift on Israel

38:00

Charlie Kirk's Own Words on Israel: Reflecting on His Moral Stand and Tragic Loss

Charlie Kirk's Own Words on Israel: Reflecting on His Moral Stand and Tragic Loss

20:16

Charlie Kirk's Final Letter to Benjamin Netanyahu Reveals Deep Concerns About Israel Losing Conservative Support

Charlie Kirk penned a detailed letter to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu warning that Israel is losing support even in conservative MAGA circles, calling it a "five alarm fire." The letter, sent on May 2nd and obtained by the New York Post, laid out Kirk's concerns about Israel's failing information war on social media and offered specific recommendations for a communications overhaul. Kirk expressed frustration that he spends half his campus tour time defending Israel while the Israeli government remains largely silent, and he questioned whether young conservatives should trust Israeli intelligence after being lied to about COVID vaccines and WMDs in Iraq.

Categories: Analysis
October 1, 2025

The Letter Goes Public

The New York Post obtained an exclusive copy of a letter Charlie Kirk sent to Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu on May 2nd. The lengthy correspondence reveals Kirk's deep concerns about Israel's declining support among young conservatives and offers a comprehensive roadmap for improving Israel's communications strategy. The letter has become a focal point of discussion as people attempt to understand Kirk's legacy and final thoughts before his death.

Benjamin Netanyahu first referenced the letter in a video address following Kirk's death. In the emotional tribute, Netanyahu said: "He wrote me a letter on May 2nd this year. He said, 'One of my greatest joys as a Christian is advocating for Israel and forming alliances to defend Judeo-Christian civilization.' A few weeks before the tragedy, I called him and I spoke to him and I said, 'Please come to Israel.' I invited him to Israel. And sadly, that visit will not take place."

A Five Alarm Fire

Kirk opened the letter by expressing his love for Israel and the Jewish people, explaining that advocating for Israel has been one of his greatest joys as a Christian. He mentioned taking over Ambassador Huckabee's show on TBN where he continually supports Israel and the Jewish people. However, Kirk did not mince words about the severity of the situation.

"I regret to report that anti-Israel and anti-Semitic trends are at record levels on social media," Kirk wrote. "These negative sentiments then flow downstream into college campuses and even seep into the conservative MAGA community. My team and I have spent months analyzing these trends and debating ideas that could help you and your country push back against these disturbing developments."

Kirk emphasized that he was writing from "a place of deep love for Israel and the Jewish people," but felt it was important to be "brutally honest with those you love." His central thesis: "In my opinion, Israel is losing the information war and needs a communications intervention."

Campus Questions and Hostile Sentiment

Kirk detailed his experiences on college campuses, where he regularly draws crowds of 4,000 to 5,000 students in what he described as "rock concert atmosphere filled with conservative patriots." Despite the conservative makeup of these audiences, Kirk found himself constantly confronted with hostile questions about Israel.

The questions he regularly faced included: Is Israel an apartheid state? Why does Israel conduct ethnic cleansing? Why is America subsidizing Israel's genocide against the Palestinian people? Is American aid helping to subsidize Israel's free healthcare? Are Israel and Jews running US foreign policy? Were Israel and Jews responsible for 9/11? Is defending Israel in our US national interest? Why is Israel trying to drag us into a war with the Middle East?

"I'm accused of being a paid apologist for Israel when I defend her," Kirk explained. "However, if I don't defend Israel strongly enough, I'm accused of being anti-Semitic. I know you've got a seven-front war and my caviling pales in comparison, but I'm trying to convey to you that Israel is losing support even in conservative circles. This should be a five alarm fire."

Kirk cited a Harvard Harris poll showing 48% of 18 to 24-year-old Americans support Hamas over Israel, and noted that even in young MAGA circles, Israel is losing support. He expressed frustration that he often spends half his time on campus tours defending Israel when the Israeli government itself remains largely silent.

The Easter Incident

Kirk recounted a specific incident that prompted him to begin composing the letter. On Easter, instead of focusing on his family, he was "getting bombarded with messages about the Israeli army making it difficult for Christians to access church in Jerusalem on Easter." He saw no official statements from Israel pushing back on this narrative.

"It was frustrating because pro-Israel surrogates like me should not be in charge of fact-checking every piece of anti-Israel misinformation that pours into social media," Kirk wrote. "Sometimes it feels like I'm defending Israel in public more than your own government."

Stop Subcontracting the Information War

A recurring theme throughout Kirk's letter was his frustration that Israel relies too heavily on American surrogates to fight its information battles. "I strongly suggest Israel not always depend on subcontracting their information war efforts to surrogates in America," he wrote.

Kirk made the comparison to Israel's military strategy: "Israel never asks for American troops because Israel does its own fighting. I suggest the same approach for the information war. You lead and people like me will follow and provide supplemental support."

He questioned whether Israel even has a press secretary comparable to Karoline Leavitt or defenders like Stephen Miller who battle the press every day for President Trump. "Honestly, I don't even know if you have a press secretary," Kirk admitted. "You are an eloquent defender of Israel, but you need a team of information warriors out there pushing back every day in real time. When you don't push back, anti-Semitism and anti-Israel propaganda fill the void."

Specific Recommendations

Kirk offered detailed recommendations for improving Israel's communications strategy. First, he suggested creating a rapid response media team modeled after President Trump's approach. "President Trump does this very effectively on social media with his own account and the White House rapid response team," Kirk noted.

He proposed creating an "Israel Truth Network" (ITN) that would include social media channels and a one-stop source of information website where negative claims about Israel could be thoroughly debunked. The website could include links to books, podcasts, media personalities, and pro-Israel thought leaders, and could serve as a conduit to groups and educators like Dennis Prager.

Kirk suggested inviting released hostages to go on a speaking tour in the United States. "These hostages can talk about how Gazan civilians not once offered any empathy or compassion," he wrote, noting that Trump had effectively used this messaging when released hostages visited the Oval Office.

He also recommended interviewing regular Israelis on the streets, creating what could become an entire social media campaign. "Ask them what they love about their country. Interview Jews, Israeli Arabs, Orthodox, secular, etc. Ask Israelis what do they wish the world knew about Israel. Ask them to respond to examples of misinformation on social media."

Show, Don't Just Tell

Kirk emphasized the importance of demonstrating Israel's values through action rather than just asserting them. "Why not show how your hospitals take care of wounded terrorists? Why not show clips of Israel dropping flyers from airplanes, warning Gazan civilians to stay out of harm's way?" he asked.

He suggested Israel could send a plane with the Star of David full of supplies to help Americans after natural disasters like hurricanes. He asked whether Israel has offered assistance to the United States with border technology or missile defense shield technology. "These are examples of effective messaging showing Israel as a close ally rather than just saying it," Kirk explained.

"Consumers of social media are aware of the billions in supplies we send to Israel, but they're less aware of what America gets in return," Kirk wrote. "You and your team need to make the argument on social media that Israel is a great friend of America and is vital to US national security."

Trust and Credibility Issues

In one of the letter's most striking passages, Kirk addressed the credibility problems Israel faces with younger conservatives who have been repeatedly lied to by government institutions.

"Among the many conservatives who support Israel, there is a concern that America could become entangled in a quagmire," Kirk wrote. "My generation grew up with disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq. We were promised there would be WMDs in Iraq, and that proved to be a lie. Our generation was also lied to by the governments of Israel and the US that COVID vaccines were safe and effective."

Kirk noted that Israeli intelligence missed October 7th, and he had asked on the Patrick Bet-David podcast if there was a stand-down order. "But we're asked to trust Israeli intelligence 100% that Iran is on the cusp of obtaining nuclear weapons," he wrote. "Young conservatives are very skeptical of government proclamations. We don't fully trust intelligence assessments."

He expressed concern that while many agree Iran should not get nuclear weapons, there is shared concern that America will get sucked into another endless war costing thousands of American lives. "Where are the Israelis who are arguing their case to win over public opinion?" Kirk asked.

Think Like a Political Campaign

Kirk urged Netanyahu to think of Israel as a political candidate running for office. "In this case, a younger woman who grew up on social media," he suggested. "Who is this candidate and what does she stand for? Right now, there's essentially a massive negative ad campaign spreading on social media. These negative ads are defining this candidate."

He argued that like any political campaign, the first task is to define the candidate. "Right now, there is not a one-stop shopping resource where younger people can learn about this candidate. Every candidate has a website and social media. It would be political malpractice to omit these tools."

Kirk was blunt in his assessment: "Sorry for the brutal honesty, but Israel's approach to social media is PR malpractice." He suggested Israel should list all the toughest questions on a website with detailed expert responses and footnotes, making these responses part of Israel's platform where positions and values are explained.

First Person vs. Third Person Voice

Kirk identified a fundamental problem with Israel's current approach: "One of Israel's biggest, most fundamental problems is typically your push back is in the third person voice. I do the third person voice all the time as I attempt to defend the candidate Israel, but I don't live in Israel. So I'm more like an attorney defending a client. Israel, the client, needs to defend itself."

He expressed frustration at the lack of Israeli voices in the media. "I can't remember the last time I saw an Israeli spokesperson on one of the evening Fox shows other than yourself," Kirk told Netanyahu. "Israel needs more first person voices to defend her. How can Israel defend and define itself if you don't even have a spokesperson out there fighting back every day?"

The Power of Social Media

Kirk acknowledged that some might dismiss social media, especially TikTok, as a waste of time, but he made a compelling case for its importance. "I have increased my followers on TikTok from approximately 1 million to 6.6 million in the last year. We get billions with a B views on TikTok. My campus tour last fall and spring have received approximately 5 billion impressions."

He noted that Elon Musk is a good friend to Israel, so X offers a great opportunity to make inroads on social media. Kirk warned that Israel should not sit back and allow its enemies to define her, citing a Pew Research poll showing 53% of Americans now have an unfavorable view of Israel, up from 42% three years ago.

"I understand social media as well as anyone in the world," Kirk wrote confidently. "From my vantage point, Israel has retreated from social media without a fight. How are you going to win over younger generations if you're starting out in retreat on social media? Younger generations use their TVs for Netflix, not the evening news. Narratives for younger and even middle-aged people are fought now on social media."

Budget and Resources

Kirk acknowledged that Israel has increased its Hasbara budget by 20 times, which he called great news. He suggested that some of this money, along with hundreds of millions of dollars raised by private pro-Israel groups, should be directed into creating pro-Israel original homegrown content and promoting it on Israel-operated social media channels and websites.

He recommended reshaping the Hasbara department into more of a political campaign headquarters with campaign narrative experts, which could serve as the mothership hosting the Israel Truth Network. "Majority of staff in these efforts should be in their 20s and 30s," Kirk advised. "The older generation alone is not going to win the information war on social media. You need to fill the ranks with young people who grew up with cell phones and social media, not pay phones and TV news."

Outdated Communication Methods

Kirk criticized Israel's outdated approach to media. "I've seen your IDF spokesman defend Israel standing at a dimly lit podium. It looks like a scene out of the 1970s, like some old Walter Cronkite clips of TV news," he wrote. "You need to tear down your old ways of communicating and start over from scratch."

He also noted that Netanyahu himself doesn't post very often on social media, and many of his clips are in Hebrew only. "Why don't you do more press conferences in Israel in English? Take on some of the tough questions I get bombarded with on college campuses. Where are all the Israeli surrogates?"

The Stakes

Kirk concluded his letter by emphasizing the high stakes involved. "Israel is the Silicon Valley of the Middle East, and Israel has an abundance of brain power and technological expertise. The question is whether Israel has the willpower to step up its game in this information war. From my vantage point, the status quo is not working. Israel is getting crushed on social media."

He warned that Israel is losing younger generations of Americans, even among MAGA conservatives. "In my opinion, you are losing the information war, which will eventually translate into less political and military support from America."

"The Holy Land is so important to my life, and it pains me to see support for Israel slip away," Kirk wrote. "Feel free to contact me on my private number below if you would like to discuss this further."

The Letter's Release and Reaction

The letter was obtained by the New York Post through Josh Christenson and David Proper, though the exact source of the letter remains unclear. Netanyahu had first mentioned the letter in a video address following Kirk's death, which sparked calls from various figures, including Candace Owens, for the letter to be released. Some had claimed Kirk was being blackmailed into making firm defenses of Israel.

The release of the letter is likely to generate reactions from multiple sides. Some will point to it as evidence of Kirk's love for Israel and commitment to the Jewish people. Others will highlight his criticisms and questions, noting that he wanted clarity on vital interests, expressed concerns about trust in Israeli intelligence, and acknowledged that his generation was lied to by both US and Israeli governments about COVID vaccines.

Regardless of one's position on Israel and Palestine, the letter reveals Charlie Kirk as a deep thinker who approached complex issues with nuance and genuine concern. He was willing to ask difficult questions while maintaining relationships and expressing love for those he challenged. The letter stands as a testament to Kirk's thoughtful approach to one of the most divisive issues in American politics.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!