Tucker Carlson Reveals What Charlie Kirk Actually Said About October 7th And Netanyahu

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Douglas MacGregor Explains Why He Believes Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated Over Foreign Policy Views

Douglas MacGregor Explains Why He Believes Charlie Kirk Was Assassinated Over Foreign Policy Views

19:40

Examining Internet Theories About Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University Without Drawing Conclusions

Examining Internet Theories About Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University Without Drawing Conclusions

20:52

Andrew Kolvet Addresses Leaked Text Messages and Charlie Kirk's Views on Israel and Free Speech

Andrew Kolvet Addresses Leaked Text Messages and Charlie Kirk's Views on Israel and Free Speech

23:39

Tucker Carlson Reveals What Charlie Kirk Actually Said About October 7th And Netanyahu

Tucker Carlson unearths previously buried footage of Charlie Kirk raising explosive questions about October 7th just five days after the attacks. Kirk, who frequently visited Israel and understood its internal politics, questioned whether a stand-down order allowed the attacks to occur, noting that Netanyahu's political career was on the brink of collapse before that day. Kirk also predicted Israel would use the tragedy to ethnically cleanse Gaza. Within hours of Kirk's assassination in 2024, Netanyahu and other Israeli officials began publicly claiming Kirk as a close ally of Israel, erasing his actual criticisms from the record. Carlson asks why these legitimate questions were never answered, and why Kirk's memory was hijacked to support the very policies he warned against.

Categories: Analysis
October 9, 2026

Charlie Kirk Questioned October 7th Five Days After It Happened

Tucker Carlson played previously overlooked footage from October 12, 2023 — just five days after the October 7th attacks — in which Charlie Kirk raised pointed questions about how the tragedy could have occurred. Kirk, who visited Israel multiple times and understood the country's security apparatus intimately, expressed deep skepticism about the official narrative.

Kirk described Israel as "a fortress" where "you cannot go 10 feet without running into a 19-year-old with an AR-15." He noted the entire country operates under constant surveillance, making the six-hour delay in Israeli military response almost impossible to believe. "Was there a stand-down order?" Kirk asked. "That is a legitimate non-conspiracy question."

Netanyahu Faced Political Collapse Before October 7th

Kirk provided crucial context that most Americans never heard: Israel stood on the brink of civil war in the months before October 7th. Massive protests against Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's judicial reforms had drawn hundreds of thousands into the streets. Another major demonstration against Netanyahu was planned for the week of October 7th.

All of that disappeared after the attacks. "Netanyahu now has an emergency government and a mandate to lead," Kirk observed. He carefully noted he wasn't definitively saying Netanyahu knew in advance, but the political timing demanded scrutiny. The government that faced imminent collapse instead gained unchallenged authority — and Netanyahu remains in power three years later.

Kirk Predicted Ethnic Cleansing Of Gaza

In a second clip from the same interview, Kirk made an even more striking prediction. "They're going to try to ethnically cleanse Gaza," he said, emphasizing he didn't use that term lightly. "They're talking about basically removing 2.5 million people from there."

Kirk acknowledged that Israel had moral justification to seek justice after witnessing women and children burned alive and dragged through streets. But he also saw clearly what was coming — a large-scale operation that would use the attacks as pretext for permanent demographic change in Gaza.

Kirk's Pattern Recognition Included COVID, Maui, And Epstein

Kirk placed October 7th within a broader pattern of events where official narratives didn't align with observable facts. He mentioned COVID, the Maui fires, and the Epstein case as examples where his instincts told him something was wrong. "When I see a story and it doesn't click, our guts are usually right," Kirk said.

Carlson noted the striking nature of this comparison: Kirk was essentially grouping the Israeli government's story about October 7th with some of the most notorious cover-ups and hoaxes in recent history. This was not the language of an uncritical Israel supporter.

Netanyahu Hijacked Kirk's Memory Hours After His Death

Charlie Kirk was assassinated in Utah in 2024. Within hours, Benjamin Netanyahu — the man Kirk had accused of potentially allowing 1,200 of his own citizens to die — became one of the first world leaders to tweet condolences. Netanyahu called Kirk a "stalwart friend of Israel" and "my close friend."

This began a coordinated effort to rewrite Kirk's legacy. President Trump's first tweet about Kirk after his death featured him with an Israeli flag. The message was clear: Charlie Kirk's defining characteristic was his unwavering support for Israel.

Carlson pointed out the absurdity: "You just saw Charlie Kirk accuse Benjamin Netanyahu of a false flag that resulted in the deaths of 1,200 of his own citizens. Doesn't sound like a close friend talking, does it?"

Current Officials Call Gaza Critics Nazis — Kirk Called It Ethnic Cleansing

The irony deepened as former Kirk allies now in the Trump administration attacked anyone using the same language Kirk used. The HHS Secretary sent out a tweet comparing those who call Israel's actions in Gaza ethnic cleansing to Joseph Goebbels. Such critics are labeled Qatari-funded anti-Semites or Nazis under the IHRA definition of antisemitism.

Yet there was Charlie Kirk, five days after October 7th, calling it exactly that — ethnic cleansing. The people now claiming his memory as a shield for Israeli policy would classify Kirk himself as an anti-Semite if he said the same things today.

The Questions Kirk Raised Were Never Answered

Carlson emphasized that the central issue isn't what people believe about October 7th, but that legitimate questions were suppressed rather than addressed. How did the most secure border in the world fail so catastrophically? How did impoverished fighters from Gaza breach multiple layers of surveillance and military response? Why did it take six hours for the Israeli military to respond to live-streamed murders?

Kirk knew enough about Israel — its politics, its security state, its leadership — to recognize these questions demanded answers. He was close enough to Israeli officials to feel comfortable raising them publicly without fear of being dismissed as ignorant or bigoted.

Yet the moment he died, those same questions became unspeakable. His memory was weaponized to silence the very criticisms he voiced.

How Lies Become History

Carlson concluded by reflecting on how historical truth gets overwritten. "If you tell lies enough, loudly enough, aggressively enough, and if you penalize people who refuse to repeat them, over time, history records them as true."

Three years after October 7th, the accepted narrative about Charlie Kirk bears no resemblance to what he actually said. Everyone knows Charlie Kirk loved Israel. Except he didn't — at least not in the uncritical way now attributed to him. He accused its government of allowing mass civilian deaths for political gain and predicted it would commit ethnic cleansing.

But nobody remembers, because remembering would require confronting uncomfortable questions about what really happened on October 7th, who benefited, and why criticism of those in power remains forbidden even when it comes from someone now celebrated as their champion.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!