Joe Rogan and Media Figures React to MSNBC Coverage of Charlie Kirk Shooting Incident at Utah Valley University
Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.
Up Next
Andrew Kolvet and Blake Neff Break Down the Tyler Robinson Preliminary Hearing and Defense Tactics
15:28
The Horrific Assassination of Charlie Kirk: A Political Murder That Shook America
4:02:08
Jesse Weber and Tracy Walder Break Down FBI Investigation Into Charlie Kirk Assassination at Utah Valley University
30:24
Joe Rogan and Media Figures React to MSNBC Coverage of Charlie Kirk Shooting Incident at Utah Valley University
Multiple media personalities and podcasters respond to coverage of a shooting incident involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in Orem. Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Officer Tatum, and others share their immediate reactions as news broke across different networks. MSNBC's live coverage drew particular scrutiny for commentary suggesting the shooting environment stemmed from divisive rhetoric and easy gun access. The incident sparked conversations about political violence, media responsibility, and how different outlets frame breaking news events involving prominent political figures.
Media personalities across multiple platforms responded to breaking news of a shooting incident involving Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in Orem, Utah. The incident occurred approximately 20 minutes into Kirk's speech when shots were fired from a nearby building. Various figures including Joe Rogan, Megyn Kelly, Officer Tatum, and others shared their immediate reactions as the news unfolded.
One commentator described being so emotionally affected by the coverage that he recorded a video response in a motor home that he ultimately decided not to post, stating he was yelling so loudly that his wife came to check on him. The raw emotional response highlighted the impact of the incident across media circles.
Network Coverage and Controversial Commentary
MSNBC's live coverage of the incident drew significant attention and criticism. The network's anchors provided breaking news updates while discussing Kirk's background and influence. They described him as having 3.8 million YouTube subscribers and 5.2 million followers on X (formerly Twitter), noting his prominence within conservative media circles.
During the coverage, MSNBC commentators made several statements that sparked controversy. One anchor discussed "the environment in which a shooting like this happens," with contributor Matthew Dowd stating: "I always go back to hateful thoughts lead to hateful words which then lead to hateful actions. And I think that's the environment we're in that people just you can't stop with these sort of awful thoughts you have and then saying these awful words and not expect awful actions to take place."
Another particularly controversial moment came when an anchor speculated whether the shooting might have been "a supporter shooting their gun off in celebration," a comment that drew sharp criticism from other media figures reviewing the coverage.
MSNBC's Framing of the Incident
The network's coverage repeatedly emphasized themes of divisive rhetoric and gun access. One anchor described Kirk as "one of the most divisive, especially divisive, younger figures" who was "constantly sort of pushing this sort of hate speech or sort of aimed at certain groups."
The discussion also focused on gun laws in Utah, noting that as of May 2021, individuals 21 or older can legally own and carry firearms openly or concealed in public without a permit. One commentator stated: "We have this awful toxic stew of political divisive hate speech that's being pushed combined with simultaneously combined with unbelievable access that people have to guns."
The coverage also mentioned that the special agent in charge of the Salt Lake City FBI field office had been terminated two weeks prior, with one anchor suggesting "the appearance is she was fired because she was a DEI hire."
Presidential Statement
President Donald Trump posted a statement on Truth Social that was read during the MSNBC broadcast: "The great and even legendary Charlie Kirk is dead. No one understood or had the heart of the youth in the United States of America better than Charlie. He was loved and admired by all, especially me. and now he is no longer with us. Melania and my sympathies go out to his beautiful wife Erika and family. Charlie, we love you."
Critics noted that the MSNBC anchor simply read Trump's statement without adding her own words of condolence or reflection on the tragedy.
Joe Rogan's Response
Joe Rogan discussed the incident on his podcast after learning about it during a recording session. When told about the shooting, Rogan's immediate response was "Awful," followed by confusion about whether Kirk had died, as information was still developing.
Rogan and his co-host expressed shock at what they characterized as someone being murdered "for having a different opinion" and "different ideology." When shown clips of MSNBC's coverage, particularly the speculation about a supporter shooting a gun in celebration, Rogan responded: "What? Someone shot their gun off in celebration and killed him. You know, you shoot celebration guns in the air. Oh god. What a crazy take."
He continued: "Why does something like that have to be spun? Their ideology. No, I know. But I'm just saying it's like I mean they want to try to pin it on a Trump supporter with a crazy Trump supporter with a gun going wacky."
Defense of Kirk's Character and Approach
Rogan characterized Kirk as "a very intelligent guy" who "wasn't even particularly rude" and "tried to be pretty reasonable with people." He added: "There's a lot of stuff that I didn't agree with him on. That's fine. You're allowed to disagree with people without celebrating the fact they got shot."
He emphasized that the appropriate response to disagreeing with someone like Kirk is to "debate him" and have "a conversation where your argument is more compelling than his." Rogan noted: "He's not a violent guy who's talking to people on college campuses. Everything I saw seemed reasonable."
One commentator defending Kirk stated: "Charlie had no problem with trans rights. Wasn't trying to take away trans rights." Another noted that Kirk "was 100% good" and that "there wasn't a hateful bone in his body."
Other Media Reactions
The communications director of Turning Point USA asked news teams to observe a moment of silence and prayer. One broadcast honored this request, with the host saying: "However, and to whomever you pray, I hope in this moment you can pray for Charlie Kirk."
Various other commentators shared their reactions, with one stating: "I don't really know where you go from here. I don't know where we go from here in a news program and I don't know where we go from here in America. I don't know what's left for us as a country to discuss when even a discussion and a debate over the issues results in violence that leads to the death of a good man in this country."
An MSNBC anchor acknowledged that even her own son had positive views of Kirk, saying he believed Kirk was "the only young politician that is out there that meets kids where they are," though she clarified he was "not a politician but affiliated with politics."
Broader Implications and Concerns
The incident sparked discussions about political violence in America. One MSNBC commentator noted: "We've seen an uptick in political gun violence in the last few months, especially there were the attempts on Donald Trump's life, obviously, going back last summer, a year ago."
Speculation arose about potential government responses, with one anchor suggesting: "After one of the Doge employees was allegedly attacked in Washington DC, that's what Donald Trump used as a justification to send in federal troops into Washington DC. You can imagine the administration using this as a justification for something."
Rogan concluded his discussion by noting: "There's going to be a lot of people celebrating this. It's so scary. It's so dangerous to celebrate or to in any way encourage this kind of behavior from human beings." He added: "This podcast has been a lot about violence, man."
The incident and varying media coverage of it highlighted deep divisions in how different outlets frame breaking news events involving prominent political figures, raising questions about media responsibility during developing situations.