Tucker Carlson: Charlie Kirk Said 'Go Max' on Jeffrey Epstein and Israeli Intelligence Claims

[00:00] [music]

[00:07] What's up, guys? It's Benny. All of life

[00:09] is governed by the laws of unintended

[00:10] consequences, [music]

[00:11] and that certainly applies to politics.

[00:14] Democrats are so ravenous to [music] get

[00:16] Donald Trump on literally anything that

[00:18] they'll go after their best friend and

[00:20] funer, Jeffrey [music] Epstein, in order

[00:23] to try and do it. The problem is the

[00:24] evidence just ain't there. As we learned

[00:26] this morning, as they ran with headlines

[00:28] like this, Trump mentioned multiple

[00:30] times in Epstein's private emails. What

[00:33] do they got? Oh, they got an email

[00:35] saying that Trump was with one of the

[00:37] girls a victim at Epstein's house. Oh,

[00:41] it's so salacious. It's so bad. It's the

[00:44] end. Look at this. This is the email

[00:45] itself. Donald Trump is with a victim

[00:49] for hours at my house. Oh my goodness.

[00:53] What happens next? Well, what happens

[00:56] next is we

[00:58] learned that the victim who was redacted

[01:00] was Virginia Roberts, who has on dozens

[01:05] of occasions, in sworn testimony, on

[01:08] national TV, in her book, in

[01:10] depositions,

[01:11] said that nothing bad ever happened with

[01:13] Donald Trump. Trump never acted

[01:15] inappropriately towards her at all. No

[01:17] sex and no flirting even. We know that

[01:20] Virginia Roberts was employed by Donald

[01:22] Trump at Mara Lago. Part of the reason

[01:24] why Trump banned Jeffrey Epstein was

[01:25] that he stole Virginia Roberts from Mara

[01:27] Lago. Uh this is established history.

[01:31] Donald Trump has talked about it. The

[01:33] unredacted version shows that it was

[01:35] Virginia Roberts who testified multiple

[01:37] times that President Trump did

[01:38] absolutely nothing wrong.

[01:40] Very strange.

[01:42] Uh

[01:44] bold strategy, Cotton, let let's see if

[01:46] it pays off for you. Will it pay off

[01:49] this Democrat obsession with Jeffrey

[01:50] Epstein? And trust me, I'm a major

[01:54] advocate of just releasing literally all

[01:56] of the Epste epste files. I want them

[01:58] all out.

[02:01] But if that were to happen, then both

[02:04] sides might learn some uncomfortable

[02:06] truths. And what's being established

[02:09] right now is that Jeffrey Epste was in

[02:10] fact an agent of Israel,

[02:14] a foreign agent that was able to get to

[02:16] the highest possible rungs. Nobody

[02:18] doubts that. Of American society,

[02:21] American billionaires like Bill Gates,

[02:23] American presidents like Bill Clinton

[02:24] flying around on his plane. What would

[02:26] we learn about our ruling class? What

[02:28] would we learn about how susceptible we

[02:30] are and how blackmailed our nation is by

[02:32] other nations? And this op, how much did

[02:36] we turn a blind eye to child predation

[02:40] in order to get more intel or protect

[02:42] our ruling class? That is a great

[02:44] question and it's something that's being

[02:46] answered by uh the drop site. This is a

[02:49] news website that has published a series

[02:51] of bombshell stories about how Israeli

[02:54] spy stayed for weeks at Jeffrey

[02:55] Epstein's Manhattan apartment. How Epste

[02:58] helped broker security deals with

[03:00] foreign nations.

[03:03] multiple foreign nations, big nations

[03:06] like Russia, Mongolia.

[03:09] I know people that do this for the Trump

[03:10] administration.

[03:12] These are people who are private

[03:13] citizens that often act on behalf of a

[03:16] state in order to get a negotiation

[03:18] done.

[03:19] They are agents of the state. That's the

[03:22] only way that these kind of things

[03:23] happen. By the way, this kind of stuff

[03:25] doesn't happen because someone

[03:28] just for out of the the goodness of

[03:30] their heart, they just go and I don't

[03:33] know negotiate a big arms deal with

[03:35] Russia or Syria in the middle of a Syri

[03:38] civil war, Mongolia. That's not how this

[03:41] all works. The last known photograph of

[03:44] Jeffrey Epste actually has him wearing

[03:46] an IDF sweatshirt. How much more

[03:50] on the nose do you have to be?

[03:54] Now, this obviously

[03:56] brings us to something very interesting

[03:59] that's happening right now when it comes

[04:01] to the legacy of Charlie Kirk in Israel.

[04:05] As has been made public, Charlie Kirk

[04:07] was uh getting a lot of push back from

[04:10] Jewish donors about having Tucker

[04:12] Carlson on stage. a principle I I knew

[04:16] and worked with Charlie Kirk very

[04:18] closely. A principle that I know as a

[04:21] matter of fact Charlie adhered to. He

[04:22] wanted open debate. He wanted to be able

[04:25] to bring as many sides together as

[04:26] possible and for us to unite and for us

[04:29] to be able to defeat the Marxist left,

[04:31] which is the ultimate em enemy. And of

[04:33] course, Charlie wasn't going to kick

[04:34] Tucker off the stage. In fact, according

[04:36] to this new video that Megan Kelly has

[04:39] released, Charlie Kirk was encouraging

[04:43] Tucker Carlson to go all the way against

[04:47] Jeffrey Epstein and his connections to

[04:50] the state of Israel. The truth shall set

[04:53] you free. Watch this.

[04:54] >> Epstein clearly had contact with Israeli

[04:57] intelligence and American intelligence

[04:58] and French intelligence, but the only

[05:00] one you're not allowed to talk about is

[05:01] Israeli intelligence. But it's it seemed

[05:03] true to me and I had done uh some work

[05:05] on that and I knew a bunch of people

[05:07] pretty close to that story. So So I

[05:09] thought that and I said that to Charlie

[05:10] and I said, "But I'm not going to say

[05:12] that because I don't want to make your

[05:13] donors mad. I know it's just going to be

[05:14] like an endless

[05:16] flurry of texts telling you to stop or

[05:18] you're going to lose a bunch of

[05:20] funding." And he looked at me, I'll

[05:22] never forget it, and said, "Go all the

[05:25] way. Do it. Go all the way." I said,

[05:27] "Man, I you know, a lot of things I can

[05:29] talk about. I don't need to talk about

[05:30] that." and he said, "Do it." So, I did

[05:33] it.

[05:36] >> And here's the thing, Stu. I was

[05:39] recently going through some old pictures

[05:42] to find one of me and Charlie that I

[05:44] knew we took at that event. And not only

[05:48] did I find pictures of me and Charlie,

[05:50] but I found a video of me, Tucker, and

[05:56] Charlie

[05:58] speaking backstage right before Tucker

[06:01] went out. Tucker and I were talking.

[06:04] Charlie came over and interrupted for

[06:06] just a second. And you can hear him on

[06:09] this tape, which I've listened to many

[06:10] times. is very clear on my phone, less

[06:12] clear here probably as we play it, but

[06:14] he says to to Tucker, "Go Max." He

[06:17] interrupts the conversation because he

[06:19] has to say to Tucker something. And what

[06:21] was so important to him to tell Tucker

[06:23] was, "Go, go, Max." Here it is.

[06:27] Go.

[06:35] >> It's quick. It's just happens to be on

[06:37] tape

[06:38] >> and it backs up what Tucker said.

[06:41] And so I just think we need to be

[06:44] realistic. Charlie understood what was

[06:47] happening to the conservative movement

[06:49] over Israel. He probably understood it

[06:51] better than any of us because he

[06:52] absolutely loved Israel. And yet he

[06:55] represented and was of young people. He

[06:59] was young. That was his constituency.

[07:01] That's where he spent all of his time.

[07:03] and he knew that even on the right side

[07:06] of the aisle, they had turned and were

[07:08] turning on Israel. And knowing all of

[07:11] that, he told Tucker to go out there and

[07:13] do all the things Tucker did. Go Max, he

[07:17] said. Now, why did he do that? Because

[07:19] he knew there was a faction within the

[07:21] conservative movement that needed a

[07:24] voice. They needed somebody to put their

[07:27] thoughts and their complaints and their

[07:28] objections into words in a public

[07:31] setting and not just seed the whole

[07:34] argument to the other side which has

[07:37] been dominating conservative thought in

[07:39] media forever. You know, the Mark

[07:40] Levenza of the world. And so it's one of

[07:43] the many reasons why I really object to

[07:46] this attempt to otherise snuff out the

[07:50] voice of Tucker Carlson. Charlie knew

[07:54] exactly where Tucker stood on these

[07:56] issues and wanted him and I quote to go

[07:59] Max. The answer to what is happening

[08:02] right now in at you know on the

[08:04] conservative half of the aisle is not to

[08:07] silence Tucker to diminish him to the

[08:10] point where he doesn't have followers.

[08:12] Not that that's possible you lunatics.

[08:15] Um or to try to delegitimize Tucker. If

[08:19] anything, Tucker is a remaining voice

[08:23] for Charlie whose views were changing

[08:26] himself. So, I have nothing against Ben

[08:30] saying all the things he feels or more

[08:32] neoconi pe people feeling that or

[08:34] pro-Israel people saying all I think

[08:36] they should say that and I understand

[08:38] perfectly where they're coming from. But

[08:39] there is another reasoned passionate

[08:43] point of view and Tucker represents that

[08:45] and that's what he's been doing on his

[08:47] show. It rubbed some people the wrong

[08:48] way, but it didn't rub Charlie the wrong

[08:50] way. In fact, he wanted more of it.

[08:53] >> Well, Tucker Carlson went out on stage

[08:55] and did exactly that. Tucker Carlson

[08:57] says Epstein was working on behalf of

[08:58] Israel and committing crimes on American

[09:01] soil.

[09:03] Why was this allowed? Well, it has to be

[09:05] allowed if the individual Jeffrey

[09:08] Epstein had protection from the intel

[09:10] agencies and law enforcement agencies

[09:12] here in America. And that has been

[09:14] wellestablished,

[09:16] demonstrably

[09:18] established.

[09:21] It's wild. Tucker's obviously covered

[09:24] this extensively. Before Epstein is

[09:26] sentenced, he flees the country. He goes

[09:27] to Israel. While he's in Israel, he

[09:29] tells people that he's thinking he just

[09:31] might stay there because they don't

[09:32] extradite Jewish criminals and ptorists.

[09:36] As a matter of fact, by the way.

[09:41] So, ladies and gentlemen,

[09:43] was Jeffrey Epste an Israeli spy?

[09:48] I I mean, you have to simply assume yes.

[09:51] And I can tell you, I'm not going to

[09:52] show anybody. It's It's very in fashion

[09:54] right now to show a bunch of like

[09:55] private messages from Charlie Kirk. I'm

[09:57] not going to do that. But on my phone,

[09:59] some of the final messages because I

[10:00] spoke at this conference from Charlie

[10:03] Kirk, some of the final messages to me

[10:04] is, "You need to go hard on Jeffrey

[10:07] Epstein. You need to talk about Jeffrey

[10:09] Epstein.

[10:11] And I did. I called for the release, as

[10:12] I do now, of all available information.

[10:15] What on earth could we possibly be

[10:16] hiding?

[10:18] The answer to that question is

[10:19] everything. Ladies and gentlemen, here's

[10:20] what Tucker said at the time on stage at

[10:23] Turning Point at Charlie's request

[10:25] because Jeffrey Epstein was an Israeli

[10:27] spy and probably working for our CIA and

[10:30] probably working for other nation

[10:31] states. At the very least, that's why he

[10:33] has so much protection and that's

[10:35] probably why he's being protected right

[10:37] now.

[10:37] >> Not acceptable. And I think the real

[10:40] answer is Jeffrey Epstein was working on

[10:42] behalf of Intel services, probably not

[10:44] American. And we have every right to ask

[10:48] on whose behalf was he working. How does

[10:50] a guy go from being a math teacher at

[10:53] the Dalton school in the late '7s with

[10:55] no college degree to having multiple

[10:57] airplanes, a private island, and the

[10:59] largest residential house in Manhattan?

[11:03] Where did all the money come from? And

[11:05] no one has ever gotten to the bottom of

[11:06] that because no one has ever tried. And

[11:09] moreover, it's extremely obvious to

[11:11] anyone who watches that this guy had

[11:13] direct connections to a foreign

[11:15] government. Now, no one's allowed to say

[11:17] that that foreign government is Israel

[11:18] because we have been somehow cowed

[11:21] [cheering]

[11:22] into thinking that that's naughty. There

[11:26] is nothing wrong with saying that. There

[11:28] is nothing hateful about saying that.

[11:30] There's nothing anti-Semitic about

[11:31] saying. There's nothing even anti-Israel

[11:33] about saying that. I've spent my entire

[11:35] life pretty much in Washington where I

[11:37] knew and loved a number of people

[11:39] including one very close person who

[11:40] worked at CIA. That has never prohibited

[11:45] me from saying I think the CIA has done

[11:47] some horrible things. Murdered a bunch

[11:48] of people, participated in the murder of

[11:50] a sitting US president. It's got a whole

[11:52] trail of crimes. That doesn't make me a

[11:55] disloyal American. It doesn't make me

[11:56] anti-American in any sense. I was born

[11:58] here. My family's been here for hundreds

[11:59] of years. I love this country. That's

[12:01] why I live here. So criticizing the

[12:04] behavior of a government agency does not

[12:06] make you a hater. It makes you a free

[12:09] person. It makes you a citizen. You're

[12:12] allowed to do that because you're not a

[12:15] slave. You're a citizen. And you have a

[12:18] right to expect that your government

[12:20] will not act against your interest. And

[12:22] you have a right to demand that foreign

[12:25] governments not be allowed to act

[12:26] against your interest. That's not

[12:28] creepy.

[12:30] It shouldn't be forbidden.

[12:32] And yet all of us have trained ourselves

[12:35] to believe that you can't say that

[12:37] somehow that that's like too naughty and

[12:39] forbidden. And the effect of making that

[12:42] off limits has been to create a lot of

[12:45] resentment and I'll say it hate online

[12:49] where people feel like they can't just

[12:50] say like what the hell is this? You have

[12:52] the former Israeli prime minister living

[12:53] in your house.

[12:56] You have had all this contact with the

[12:57] foreign government. Were you working on

[12:59] behalf of MSAD? Were you running a

[13:04] blackmail operation on behalf of foreign

[13:06] government? By the way, every single

[13:08] person in Washington DC thinks that.

[13:10] I've never met anyone who doesn't think

[13:11] that. I don't know any of them that hate

[13:13] Israel, but no one feels they can say

[13:15] that. Why? And I think the longer that

[13:18] we play along with it, the more

[13:20] subterranean and creepy and hateful the

[13:23] conversation actually becomes. So, I

[13:26] think it's better just to say it right

[13:27] out loud.

[13:29] Did this happen? And of course, that

[13:31] question has been asked to the

[13:32] government of Israel, and their answer

[13:32] is, we're not going to tell you. And I

[13:35] think our answer should be, no, no, no.

[13:37] As long as we're sending you money, if

[13:39] you were committing crimes on our soil,

[13:40] we have an absolute right to know. Did

[13:42] you do this or not?

[13:45] And yet everybody has been so

[13:47] brainwashed

[13:49] into thinking that's somehow an

[13:51] expression of hate or bigotry when it's

[13:54] not. It's a baseline question that every

[13:57] [music] US citizen has a right to an

[14:00] answer on. What the hell was this? And

[14:04] by the way, if it turns out that it was

[14:06] nothing [music]

[14:13] >> [music]

[14:18] >> Hey,

[14:23] hey, hey.