Up Next

Charlie Kirk Questions Why Russia Is Our Enemy on the Thousandth Day of Unnecessary War

Charlie Kirk Questions Why Russia Is Our Enemy on the Thousandth Day of Unnecessary War

15:08

Barack Obama on Defeating Trumpism, Rebuilding Democratic Trust, and the Future of Progressive Politics in America

Barack Obama on Defeating Trumpism, Rebuilding Democratic Trust, and the Future of Progressive Politics in America

1:05:15

Stephen A. Smith Sits Down With Candace Owens: Black Conservatives, Harvey Weinstein, and Why Democrats Lost

Stephen A. Smith Sits Down With Candace Owens: Black Conservatives, Harvey Weinstein, and Why Democrats Lost

1:01:59

Ben Wittes on Alexei Navalny's Death Tucker Carlson's Grotesque Putin Propaganda and GOP Moral Collapse

Categories: Liberal Opinions
February 16, 2024

Ben Wittes joins Tim Miller to discuss the reported death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in a remote Arctic penal colony, presumably murdered by Vladimir Putin. Wittes refuses to accept passive language around Navalny's death and insists on calling it what it is: assassination. The conversation turns to Tucker Carlson's propaganda tour in Russia, his grocery store theater, and his astonishing claim that "leadership requires killing people." Wittes and Miller examine the moral rot spreading through the Republican Party, from Tucker's Putin cheerleading to members of Congress comparing Trump's legal troubles to Navalny's murder. They also cover updates on the fabricated Biden-Burisma allegations and the Fani Willis hearing in Georgia. This is a searing discussion about courage, cowardice, and what America once stood for to dissidents around the world.

The Reported Death of Alexei Navalny

Ben Wittes begins by refusing to accept the Russian government's narrative at face value. While Russian state media claims Navalny collapsed and died during a walk at the polar wolf Arctic penal colony where he was serving a three-decade sentence, Wittes insists on waiting for confirmation from Navalny's own organization before accepting it as fact. As a matter of principle, he does not accept any factual representations from the Russian government.

Assuming the reports are true, Wittes is adamant about the language used to describe what happened. "We should not say that he collapsed and died on a walk at a penal colony," Wittes states. "He was murdered by Vladimir Putin." At minimum, Putin murdered him by placing him in conditions where death was highly probable. Wittes notes the persistent allegations that Navalny was being poisoned or mistreated, and argues against using passive voice or making Navalny the subject rather than the object of the sentence.

Navalny, other than Volodymyr Zelenskyy, was Vladimir Putin's single most important enemy in the world. He voluntarily returned to Russia after having been poisoned with Novichok, even revealing publicly how the poisoning was carried out. His imprisonment and disappearance was an effort to kill him and remove him from Russian politics, and the West should not let Putin get away with sanitizing the cause of death.

Navalny's wife Yulia, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, stated that if the reports are true, she wants Putin, his entourage, his friends, and his government to know they will be held responsible for what they have done to her country, her family, and her husband, and that day will come very soon.

Navalny's Unique Position in Russian Opposition

Wittes emphasizes that if true, Navalny's death represents a devastating blow to Russian opposition movements. The Russian opposition has long struggled with co-opted figures, ultra-nationalists, and straightforward people whom Putin has simply murdered, most famously Boris Nemtsov. While you can kill a person but not kill a dream, Wittes notes, killing enough people makes a pretty significant impact on the dream.

Navalny was special because he had an ability to communicate not just with elite Russian liberals, but with ordinary Russians angry about government corruption and oligarchs amassing fortunes while building palaces. He was exceptionally talented at addressing issues Russians actually cared about. His loss represents a significant blow to the idea of a genuinely democratic opposition in Russia that does not aspire to imperial conquest of half of Europe.

Wittes presents a partial list of Putin critics and opponents who have mysteriously died or been targeted: Navalny twice, Magnitsky, Khangoshvili shot in Berlin in 2019, Skripal poisoned in 2018, Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Britain in 2018, and Nemtsov in 2015. But Navalny stands apart. He is certainly the most important since Nemtsov and may be more important. Unlike many obscure victims, Navalny was not obscure in the West. Just weeks before, when he disappeared in prison and concerns grew that he was dead, the hashtag where is Navalny trended globally, and Secretary of State Blinken spoke about it publicly before the Russians released proof of life.

What Can the United States Do?

Wittes acknowledges there is limited direct action the United States can take. This is internal to Russia, literally happening in a penal colony in the deepest reaches of Siberia. The U.S. has already imposed significant pressure on Russia due to Ukraine, freezing assets and seizing yachts. There are not many more levers to pull that have not already been used.

What can be done is talking about it extensively. Wittes plans to project the word "murderers" on the Russian Embassy. At both senior government levels and individual levels, people should discuss this case, play clips of Navalny, and share the videos he made. These are astonishing pieces of investigative work, though many are in Russian because Russians were the intended audience. People should learn about what Navalny and his organization accomplished and remember it the next time Tucker Carlson suggests we should listen to Putin.

In a sane world, if Republicans were holding up Ukraine aid and Putin murdered his most important critic, cooler heads would prevail and the Speaker would call an immediate vote for unconditional Ukraine aid so Putin does not get the windfall of congressional inaction on top of murdering his chief critic. But this is not an entirely sane world. For many like Mike Johnson and Tucker Carlson, this might just show the need for more dialogue with Putin. Some might even suggest Putin only killed Navalny because the West has not been nice enough to him.

Wittes worries people will cram the news into their own preconceptions. Nevertheless, this should concentrate minds. Putin is murderous at the national level, personal level, and state institutional level. The United States has to be more like Adam Kinzinger than Mike Johnson about this and put domestic considerations aside to pass the Ukraine supplemental.

Tucker Carlson's Grotesque Propaganda

During the conversation, Tucker Carlson appears live at the World Government Summit 2024. When challenged about not asking Putin about freedom of speech in Russia, Navalny, assassinations, or restrictions on opposition in coming elections, Carlson responds with a stunning statement: "Every leader kills people, including my leader. Every leader kills people. Some kill more than others. Leadership requires killing people. Sorry, it's why I wouldn't want to be a leader."

Carlson continues that press restriction is universal, claiming there is more censorship in Russia than the United States but a great deal in the United States. He says people can decide what countries or systems they think are better, but he just wanted to know what Putin thinks.

Wittes states bluntly: "There is nothing we can do about the Tuckers of the world. There is something we can do about the Mike Johnsons of the world." That involves a maximum pressure campaign to get Johnson to hold a vote on Ukraine aid, and the Navalny story, if true, should work as a significant weapon in that effort. He is confident Navalny would want that as well. In the longer term, these people who do not understand the need to stand up to Vladimir Putin need to be removed from power through electoral means.

The exchange reminds Miller of Trump's 2016 interview with Bill O'Reilly, when O'Reilly asked about Putin's assassinations and Trump responded, "You think our country's so innocent? We've got a lot of killers." This mindset has infected a huge portion of the Republican Party. The party that once felt America was the hope of the world now says, "You think we're so innocent? Everybody's a killer."

The GOP's Moral Collapse and Grotesque Comparisons

The moral equivalence has spread shockingly far. Dinesh D'Souza claims Trump is Navalny and Biden is Putin, that Trump is being persecuted. Even Lee Zeldin, known as a moderate Republican, tweets: "As the world reflects on the murder of Alexei Navalny at the hands of Putin, it's worth remembering the Democrats are actively doing Biden's bidding as they also try to imprison his chief political opponent Donald Trump."

Wittes addresses this disgusting moral equivalence by pointing to the stark differences between the Russian and American justice systems. If you can watch proceedings against Navalny and proceedings against Trump and see them as equivalent, you fundamentally misunderstand both systems. The Russian justice system is an instrument of repressive state power and nothing more. The American justice system has problems, but Trump is getting four fair trials in four different jurisdictions supervised by four different judges, state and federal. He will have ample opportunity to prove himself innocent of each of the 91 felony counts. He may not even be convicted of all of them. The burden is actually on the prosecution.

Part of the answer lies in letting the system play out so people can evaluate whether the results have integrity. The harder challenge is the political system. How do you convince a political culture that it has integrity and that its systems have integrity in the face of a relentless multi-year campaign of delegitimization? How do you keep people confident that the U.S. system and Russian system are not the same, that Joe Biden is not out murdering political opponents? Biden is supposed to be too old and senile to be killing people, and his own son is being investigated by the DOJ.

Miller rewatched the Sarah Palin Katie Couric interview and notes that as bad as Palin was, her talking points were much more mainstream. She talked about Reagan and the shining city on a hill, the threat from Putin, worries about climate change. Fast forward to this week and Sarah Palin posts a meme with Tucker and Putin's faces superimposed on two people smiling over a grave marked "the media and the Democrats." This woman who was on a vice presidential ticket is cheerleading the idea that Putin is murdering journalists, and days later he allegedly murders the opposition political leader.

Did Putin Time Navalny's Death Around Tucker's Visit?

Wittes raises a causal question about Tucker's trip. If you are Vladimir Putin and you have decided to kill Navalny at the most opportune moment, you want to time it because there will be backlash. Congress has stalled on Ukraine aid for four months, creating a perception that the American political system is weakening in its resolve to confront Russia. Then one of the most prominent Russia apologists in the United States, second only to or perhaps even ahead of Donald Trump, shows up in Moscow to kiss Putin's behind. Did Putin take the current GOP posture, Tucker's visit, Sarah Palin's activities, and everything together as a sign this is a good moment?

When you act like shills for Putin, he takes it as a signal. When you stand up to him, he takes that as a signal. When you pucker your lips and kiss his behind, he takes that as a signal. He is getting a lot of good signals right now.

Miller shares his disgust at Tucker's grocery store video, where Tucker claims that seeing Russian grocery prices and how people live will "radicalize you against our leaders." This is in a country where 25% of the population does not have running water. People have been impressed with Moscow Metro stations since the Stalin era while missing things like the Ukrainian famine because they were impressed with subway stations. Tucker should drive 50 or 100 miles out of Moscow and see what he thinks then.

But Miller and Wittes agree Tucker is not actually falling for anything. Tucker is a very smart person, evident in his writing and in interviews that were not like his Putin interview. He is a malevolent person who has decided, whether out of grievance toward fellow Americans, hatred that he does not get the treatment among American elites he wishes, desire for money or fame, trolling, or nihilism, to become the number one propagandist for a homicidal maniac who just murdered his political opponent, is kidnapping children, and has invaded another country. The lack of rage and disgust among Republican elites and Tucker's friends and allies is most disheartening.

Explaining America's Betrayal to Ukrainians

Wittes spends significant time with actual Ukrainians and increasingly has to explain his country's behavior to them. They are not like Tucker and Trump. They actually believe in America in an innocent way as the people who confronted the Soviet Union, organized NATO, represent democracy and relatively non-corrupt capitalism, and are the shield of the democratic world. Try explaining Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump and why Trump hates Ukraine to a table full of Ukrainians. It has something to do with Burisma and personal pettiness while they are trying to keep their country independent, get 20,000 kidnapped children back, and save as many lives as possible. It is enraging when you have had that conversation for the 50th time. Half the country's behavior, or 30%, is inexcusable.

Miller reflects that the inverse was once true and one of the most inspiring things. Mark Salter, McCain's speechwriter, would tell stories of traveling with McCain all over the world. The 22-year-old Ukrainians and Georgians in countries with their own autocrats knew the McCain brand, the American brand. It meant something. It meant they will be on our side. Now these people have to feel like a big portion of the country is on the side of the murderer and the despot.

Alexander Smirnov Charged with Fabricating Biden-Burisma Claims

In Trump trial updates, Trump-appointed special counsel David Weiss charged Alexander Smirnov, age 43, with lying to the FBI and creating false records. He was arrested at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. Smirnov is charged with fabricating the notion that he discussed Burisma business dealings with Hunter and Joe Biden when Biden was vice president. There was evidence conversations happened when Biden was a private citizen during the Trump presidency, but Smirnov fabricated to investigators that conversations occurred when Biden was vice president, an obviously significant difference. This claim was mentioned on the Hannity Show 82 times and Smirnov was a star witness for House Oversight Committee investigations.

Wittes points out the prosecutor bringing the case is the same prosecutor prosecuting Hunter Biden, special counsel David Weiss. Someone trying to make a case against Biden, presented with a witness claiming a big bribe demand involving Hunter and Joe Biden, turned around and prosecuted the witness. That gives an idea of how credible the story was.

There are two sides to the Hunter Biden story. One is that Hunter was an addict who engaged in shady behavior, traded on his father's name, and got into legal trouble. The second aspect was that this was somehow a larger story about Joe Biden than Hunter Biden. The different elements of that story have all turned out to be false. It does not stop House Oversight from talking about the Biden crime family, but no component ends up being true for the simple reason that Joe Biden is not corrupt. Whatever else he is—old, what he is—he appears to have mishandled classified information but is not a corrupt guy taking bribes. They get excited about people with stories to tell who turn out to be charlatans or do not tell the stories claimed. This consistent pattern should make people careful with the Jim Jordans and James Comers trying to make Hunter Biden about Joe Biden. The Burisma conspiracy theory was obvious from the start.

Fani Willis Takes the Stand

Wittes was glued to the Fani Willis hearing, calling it better television than Court TV at its best during the O.J. trial. Fani Willis has a problem but Wittes believes she solved most of it herself. She had a relationship with Nathan Wade, whom she hired as special prosecutor in the Trump Georgia case. The issue is whether there is a conflict of interest from their financial arrangements through the affair.

Wade took the stand and was completely incredible in Wittes's assessment. He claimed they had gone on vacations together but she paid him back for everything in cash. The court heard testimony from a former friend of Willis, whose apartment she had taken over, claiming Wade and Willis had been dating much earlier than they acknowledged. The significance is that it is much worse if she hired someone she was sleeping with than if they started a romantic relationship after a professional relationship began.

Things looked bad for Willis around 2 p.m., then she charged into the courtroom and demanded to testify. Wittes has never seen someone take over a courtroom like she did. She talked about why she always keeps cash around her apartment and was as compelling as Wade was evasive. By the end of the day, she had saved the situation. Wittes believes there is no basis to disqualify her after both sworn testimonies, though the hearing continued the next day. He thinks this will end up being a tempest in a teapot, though an entertaining one with elements of Perry Mason, General Hospital, and House of Cards.

If Willis had consulted Wittes asking if she should have an affair with the special prosecutor and reimburse him for joint travel with wads of cash, he would have said no part of that sounds like a good plan. It would come out, she would get beaten up over it, there would be litigation, and it would let Trump change the subject. But she did not consult him, nor did Wade ask how to answer his divorce interrogatories. Nobody consulted Wittes on this, and he would have suggested they handle it differently. But that is not the question. The question is whether she will be disqualified from the case and whether Trump will reap a windfall. Wittes believes the answer is no.

Comments

Be the first to comment on this video.

Video Transcript

[00:00] there is nothing we can do about the

[00:02] Tuckers of the world there is something

[00:05] we can do about the Mike Johnson's of

[00:07] the world and people who don't

[00:10] understand that you need to uh stand up

[00:12] to Vladimir

[00:14] Putin really need to not be in

[00:17] [Music]

[00:23] power hello and welcome to the B podcast

[00:26] I'm your host Tim Miller I'm here with a

[00:28] guy that you all know all of youve been

[00:30] around here for a while the the Trump

[00:32] trials man uh the enl of fun live stream

[00:36] veteran Brookings Foundation what else

[00:39] what else do you do Ben wit us law fair

[00:42] law fair all right law fair that's

[00:45] that's quite the buzzword these days I

[00:47] notice on true the and on and in the

[00:50] president's uh bleet he's been bleeding

[00:53] about law fair and every time he does it

[00:55] I I just attach the support law fair

[00:58] link and and share it because uh you

[01:03] know why not why not I know every time

[01:06] he jumps out I like he learned a new

[01:07] word we maybe we blame you for that a

[01:10] little bit um okay we brought you in

[01:12] kind of the last minute here because we

[01:13] have some uh pretty sad news this

[01:15] morning Lexi naly Russian President

[01:17] Vladimir Putin's most formidable

[01:19] opposition opponent uh collapsed and

[01:22] died on Friday after a walk at the polar

[01:26] wolf Arctic penal colony where he'd been

[01:28] serving a three decade jail

[01:31] term um he was 47 years old and um I I

[01:35] guess before uh I get your reaction I

[01:38] wanted to just take a moment to

[01:40] appreciate The Bravery of nval who knew

[01:43] the risks that he was taking going back

[01:46] to Russia and he talked about why he did

[01:48] that a few years ago in an interview

[01:50] with Christian Amur let's listen to that

[01:52] why do you want to go back and and I

[01:54] guess do you think you'll be safe when

[01:57] you go

[01:58] back well well I don't uh think that I

[02:02] uh can have such a privilege being safe

[02:05] in Russia but uh I have to go back

[02:07] because I don't want these you know

[02:10] groups of killer exist in Russia I don't

[02:14] want Putin uh be ruling of Russia I

[02:16] don't him being president I don't want

[02:18] him being Z of Russia because well he's

[02:21] killing people he's a reason why our the

[02:24] whole country is degradating here's the

[02:25] reason why people are so poor we have 25

[02:29] Millions people living below the poverty

[02:31] line and the whole degradation of system

[02:34] uh fortunately for me including system

[02:37] of assination of people uh he's a reason

[02:40] of that and uh I want to go back and try

[02:43] to change

[02:44] it well not a lot of Heroes these days

[02:47] uh but uh he certainly won uh Ben what's

[02:50] your reaction to the news this morning

[02:52] all right so a few things the first is

[02:55] that I will accept that it is true when

[03:00] and only when naval's people announce it

[03:03] what we have right now and it's not that

[03:06] I doubt that it's true it's that I as a

[03:08] matter of principle don't accept any

[03:11] factual representation coming from the

[03:13] Russian government what we have right

[03:16] now is a Russian government claim in

[03:18] their media that he is dead and that the

[03:22] circumstances you describe are the

[03:24] circumstances of his death uh so let let

[03:28] me start with that let's um uh wait

[03:32] until his people actually confirm it he

[03:36] has a very developed

[03:37] organization second thing is that

[03:39] assuming it is true uh we should not say

[03:43] that he collapsed and died on a walk at

[03:47] a penal colony he was murdered uh by

[03:50] Vladimir Putin um uh at a minimum by

[03:56] putting him in a in a penal colony in

[03:59] which uh death is a very likely reaction

[04:02] uh uh probability we've all been

[04:05] expecting his uh death uh for a while um

[04:11] uh but uh you know the persistent

[04:14] allegations that he was being poisoned

[04:16] or that he was being

[04:18] mistreated uh uh have been such that we

[04:22] shouldn't default to the passive voice

[04:26] um or to make him the subject

[04:30] rather than the object of the sentence

[04:32] this is somebody who is uh other than

[04:35] volodimir zalinski uh the single most

[04:38] important enemy of Vladimir Putin in the

[04:41] world who voluntarily returned

[04:44] himself uh to Russia after having been

[04:48] poisoned once um remember he was the

[04:52] reason he was abroad was that he had

[04:55] been uh Nova chucked um uh in a fashion

[05:00] that he then you know revealed how it

[05:03] was done um uh and so um like we should

[05:09] not like if he if he was if he is dead

[05:14] um we should wait for his people to

[05:17] confirm that and we should also assume

[05:21] uh irrespective of the uh the uh stated

[05:26] cause of death his imprisonment and his

[05:29] dis appearance was an effort to kill him

[05:32] and remove him from the um from from

[05:37] Russian politics and we should uh not

[05:41] let Putin get away with that um uh by

[05:46] reflecting the causes of death as though

[05:49] they are not intentionally inflicted my

[05:52] guess is that the a this that he is dead

[05:55] is true and B that there is something

[05:57] more active here than a walk in the park

[05:59] Park um certainly certainly we're I'm

[06:02] going to be sending this video as a

[06:05] sternly worded letter to our friends at

[06:06] the reuter's wire wire with a lesson

[06:08] about the passive voice um uh nal's wife

[06:12] uh Julia is was at the Munich security

[06:15] conference uh this morning and she spoke

[06:18] uh in pretty similar terms to what you

[06:20] just said um uh she caveats at the start

[06:23] if it's true I want Putin his Entourage

[06:26] Putin's friends and his government to

[06:28] know that they will be held responsible

[06:29] for what they have done to our country

[06:31] my family and my husband and that day

[06:33] will come very soon uh Joe Biden in

[06:37] 2021 uh threatened uh Vladimir Putin

[06:41] about over naval's death um he warned of

[06:44] devastating consequences for Russia if

[06:47] Naval dies in prison so let's with with

[06:50] that caveat that both you and Julia

[06:52] offered uh let's presume it's true um

[06:56] what what next what are the implications

[07:00] well so uh first of all if it's true

[07:04] it's a devastating blow uh one of the

[07:07] problems that the Russian opposition has

[07:09] had over the years is that um you know

[07:15] there a lot a lot of their people have

[07:18] turned out to be co-opt in some respect

[07:21] um some of them have turned out to be

[07:23] ultra

[07:24] nationalists uh and the ones who have

[07:27] been honor straightforward people and

[07:31] there are a bunch of them um of course

[07:34] most famously Boris nof um Putin has

[07:37] just murdered um and you know you

[07:42] can there's a saying where you can kill

[07:45] a person but you can't kill a dream but

[07:47] it actually turns out that if you kill

[07:50] enough people it makes a pretty big

[07:52] impact on on the dream and U navali was

[07:57] a a special figure in that he had an

[08:01] ability to talk not just to not

[08:05] principally to Elite Russians um Elite

[08:08] Russian liberals but

[08:10] to people who were just angry about the

[08:14] capacity of the Russian government to

[08:16] them over and

[08:19] become gazillionaire oligarchs with

[08:22] palaces right and he was extremely

[08:25] talented at um at talking about things

[08:29] that Russians actually cared about um

[08:32] and so I I do think if it is true the

[08:36] the loss to the idea of a Russian

[08:38] opposition a demo a genuinely Democratic

[08:42] opposition in Russia that does not

[08:44] aspire to uh you know to

[08:48] Imperial conquest of half of Europe it's

[08:52] a significant blow um what happens next

[08:56] look there is not that much the United

[08:59] United States can do about this um this

[09:02] is very internal to Russia um you know

[09:06] it's literally in a penal colony and the

[09:09] deepest darkest reaches of

[09:11] Siberia um and uh we've already done a

[09:16] lot of things like freezing assets that

[09:19] you know as a result of Ukraine and so

[09:21] it's not that there's a lot of us

[09:24] potential pressure on Russia that we're

[09:26] not already exerting we can't take any

[09:30] more Yachts there aren't any more Yachts

[09:32] that we can take or I

[09:34] mean already I would I would hope we've

[09:37] already taken the Yachts um but what we

[09:40] can do is talk about it and talk about

[09:42] it a lot um I plan to uh project the

[09:46] word murderers on the Russian Embassy

[09:48] this evening and um uh there will be you

[09:52] know a a series of protests I'm sure um

[09:56] and look both at the senior levels of

[09:59] government and at the individual levels

[10:02] uh people should talk about it people

[10:04] should uh play the clips of Naval play

[10:07] the videos that he made these are

[10:10] astonishing pieces of kind of

[10:14] investigative uh I mean a lot of them

[10:17] they're in Russian because they're we're

[10:18] not the audience for them but people

[10:20] should really learn about what it is

[10:23] that that organization and what he did

[10:27] um and you know

[10:30] and remember it the next time Tucker

[10:33] Carlson tells you that you know we you

[10:36] may not agree with Putin but we should

[10:38] listen to it yeah I want I want to get

[10:40] to our friend Tucker in a second uh uh

[10:43] just to put a finer point and I pulled

[10:44] this up a um uh that AG Hamilton was

[10:47] sharing the partial list of pu Putin

[10:49] critics or opponents who have

[10:51] mysteriously died or been targeted or

[10:53] obviously assassinated over the last few

[10:55] years at naly now twice prosan Magano uh

[11:00] Kango shot in Berlin 2019 veroff

[11:04] poisoned 2018 uh Sergey you're gonna

[11:07] have to excuse some of my Russian

[11:09] pronunciations Sergey scrippal and his

[11:10] daughter uh in in Britain in 18 nsof

[11:14] which who you mentioned in 15 so this is

[11:18] something that people know right uh it's

[11:20] not like a secret that that Putin has

[11:23] been engaging in these types of

[11:25] assassinations of his political

[11:26] opponents but is

[11:29] is not noal maybe a category difference

[11:32] from those examples as far as as as

[11:36] maybe rallying more intense focus and

[11:40] opposition so I think he's certainly the

[11:43] most important since nof and he may be

[11:46] more important than nof um uh a you know

[11:50] a lot of the people that you mentioned

[11:52] are people who uh are those not familiar

[11:56] with contemporary Russian politics those

[11:58] are named you wouldn't know I mean scle

[12:00] and his daughter of course are are a

[12:03] little bit different because it was in

[12:06] init the UK and and it was somebody that

[12:10] he had um had been traded uh in a in a

[12:14] spy exchange but um a most of those

[12:17] people are relatively obscure uh in the

[12:20] West on N um nval is not obscure um and

[12:25] in fact it was only a few weeks ago that

[12:28] um

[12:29] you know he disappeared for a while in

[12:31] that prison and um there was a lot of

[12:35] concern that he was dead at the time and

[12:39] the expression G nalni where is naali

[12:42] was a like a big trending social media

[12:45] thing um and blinkin talked about it

[12:49] publicly secretary blinkin and then the

[12:52] Russians you know let him release a

[12:54] little video or you know there was a

[12:56] little like but there was a kind of

[12:58] proof Proof of Life situation and so

[13:01] they are not entirely unresponsive to uh

[13:05] public pressure about him the problem is

[13:08] that once he is dead the public pressure

[13:11] is for what right what's the what what's

[13:15] the accountability that you can demand

[13:18] for one dead Alexi naal that demanding

[13:22] for you know 50,000 dead ukrainians and

[13:27] 20,000 uh missing stolen Ukrainian

[13:31] children uh if you've resisted that

[13:35] what's the what's the added pressure

[13:38] that you can do um and look the answer

[13:42] is that the president of the United

[13:43] States should talk about it everybody at

[13:46] the Munich security conference should be

[13:48] talking about it um and you know people

[13:53] should exact a price and um I would hope

[13:57] that companies that are still still

[13:59] doing business in Russia uh now uh get

[14:03] the question again uh only with naal

[14:07] instead of Ukraine as the reason for the

[14:09] question or in addition to Ukraine so I

[14:13] look am am I optimistic that there is

[14:17] some magic lever that will be pulled now

[14:20] because novali is dead that was not true

[14:24] because of a full-scale Invasion and

[14:27] genocidal conduct in Ukraine no do I

[14:30] think we should all act like there is

[14:33] yes okay um the the range of Bad actors

[14:38] um you know this this highlights uh over

[14:41] here in America particularly well not

[14:44] just not particularly entirely basically

[14:46] in the Republican Party um you know goes

[14:48] from the don't leave out Jill Stein oh

[14:52] and Jill and our friend Jill the

[14:53] enablers uh to the propagandas uh before

[14:56] we get to Tucker and the and Sarah pal

[14:58] and and denes Duan the worst actors um I

[15:01] want to highlight something that that

[15:04] kinzinger uh put up on his substack this

[15:06] morning uh that Alex Nal Alexi naly was

[15:09] everything that the GOP isn't uh taking

[15:11] a stand doesn't have to cost your life

[15:13] but God forbid you lose your access I do

[15:16] Wonder let's just put Tucker in that

[15:19] kind of crowd of comrades over over in a

[15:22] box for one second um as we look to to

[15:26] Ukraine Aid and the actual you know

[15:28] responses that are necessary might

[15:31] something like this backfire on Putin as

[15:34] far as forcing you know some of the

[15:36] spineless weasel the Mike Johnson's of

[15:39] the world to actually actually finally

[15:42] act and show show a little backbone do

[15:45] you see do you see any possible green

[15:46] shoots there well so look in a sane

[15:51] world where Republicans were holding up

[15:55] Ukraine Aid because of the Border but

[15:58] not because of the border and insisting

[16:00] on Border legislation but then nixing

[16:03] border legislation and letting uh uh the

[16:06] Russians uh overrun AV divka um uh

[16:11] because the ukrainians don't have enough

[16:13] artillery in a sane world like that uh

[16:16] if Putin murdered his most uh important

[16:21] critic you would think cooler heads

[16:24] would Prevail and the speaker would

[16:28] issue uh would call an immediate vote uh

[16:31] for unconditional

[16:33] unattached Ukraine AIDS so that uh at

[16:37] least he doesn't get the windfall of

[16:41] congressional inaction on top of

[16:43] murdering his chief critic but if you

[16:46] haven't noticed him we don't live in an

[16:49] entirely sane World um we uh live with

[16:55] in a world in which uh all the data

[16:59] prove everybody's hypotheses for a lot

[17:03] of Mike Johnson's and Tucker Carlson's

[17:06] you know this just might show the need

[17:08] for more dialogue with Putin after all

[17:11] if maybe he only killed uh uh navali

[17:15] because um you know we haven't been

[17:18] being nice enough to him so I I I do

[17:21] worry that people will uh you know cram

[17:25] it into their own crazy preconceptions

[17:28] of thing that said look this should

[17:31] concentrate everybody's mind this is a

[17:34] murderous guy he's murderous at the

[17:36] national level he's murderous at the uh

[17:40] at the personal level um and he's

[17:43] murderous at the State uh institutional

[17:47] level and you you know the United States

[17:53] has to be more kininger than Johnson

[17:56] about this and we just have to

[17:58] you know put certain domestic

[18:01] considerations aside and just pass that

[18:05] supplemental um well uh you suggested

[18:08] that maybe the Tuckers of the world

[18:10] would show that this uh needs additional

[18:13] dialogue I've got we've got we're doing

[18:15] it live this morning Ben um Tucker is

[18:18] right uh he's on stage right now at the

[18:21] world government Summit 20124 let's just

[18:24] I I don't exactly know what he said um

[18:26] but uh let's just listen to it live

[18:28] together I'll use the Devil's Advocate

[18:30] but Advocate away yes okay I'll tell you

[18:34] you should challenge in in in the rules

[18:37] of an interview and you are a master in

[18:39] in your in your business uh it's not for

[18:42] me to give you a lecture about that but

[18:44] you should challenge some ideas for

[18:47] instance

[18:49] uh you you didn't talk about freedom of

[18:53] speech in in Russia you did not talk

[18:55] about Naval about assassination

[18:58] about about restrictions on opposition

[19:02] in the coming uh elections I didn't talk

[19:06] about the things that every other

[19:07] American Media Outlet talks about

[19:09] exclusively because those are covered

[19:11] and because I have spent my life talking

[19:13] to people who run countries in various

[19:15] countries and have concluded the

[19:17] following that every leader kills people

[19:19] including my leader every leader kills

[19:21] people some kill more than others

[19:22] leadership requires killing people sorry

[19:24] it's why I wouldn't want to be a leader

[19:26] um that press restriction is universal

[19:29] in the United States I know because I've

[19:30] lived it I you know asked my former you

[19:32] know I I've had a lot of jobs um and

[19:35] I've done this for 34 years and I know

[19:36] how it works and um there's more

[19:39] censorship in Russia than there is in

[19:40] the United States but there's a great

[19:41] deal in the United States and so you

[19:43] know at a certain point it's like people

[19:44] can decide whether they think you know

[19:47] what what countries they think are

[19:48] better what systems they think are

[19:49] better I just want to know what he

[19:51] thinks that was the whole point yeah

[19:53] okay leadership leadership requires

[19:55] killing people leadership requires

[19:57] killing people so I you know I wasn't

[19:59] far off there um look um there is

[20:04] nothing we can do about the Tuckers of

[20:07] the world there is something we can do

[20:09] about the Mike Johnson's of the world

[20:11] and um that involves in the short term

[20:17] um a maximum pressure campaign to get

[20:20] him to hold this vote and I do hope that

[20:25] the naali story if it's true

[20:28] is uh will work as a significant arrow

[20:32] in that quiver uh uh and I'm confident

[20:35] that Naval would want that as well um

[20:40] the second thing is that these people

[20:42] really need to be removed from power and

[20:45] and that's a you know a longer term

[20:48] electoral uh thing but people who don't

[20:51] understand that you need to uh stand up

[20:54] to Vladimir

[20:56] Putin really need to not not be in

[20:59] power yeah you know what it reminds me

[21:01] of is um just listening to that is

[21:06] 20 but I can't remember if it was during

[21:08] the campaign in 2016 or maybe right

[21:10] after he was elected president um Trump

[21:12] does the interview with O'Reilly where

[21:14] O'Reilly asks him about uh Putin and his

[21:18] assassinations pure you think our

[21:21] country is so innocent we've got a lot

[21:23] of killers you think our country's so

[21:25] innocent that mindset I I do think you

[21:28] know it's just I'm struck there was the

[21:30] interview this week with Marco where

[21:31] he's talking to Jake Tapper and he's

[21:33] like yeah Trump says some crazy things

[21:35] he's not part of the Council on Foreign

[21:36] Relations but you can't you know take

[21:38] that all seriously and and just how

[21:41] wrong that worldview is and and how much

[21:43] the Trump World View that that the

[21:47] United States is not great that the

[21:50] United States is not any different from

[21:52] any of these other countries um uh in

[21:55] motivation uh it is a very

[21:58] uh debased view of the country a very

[22:01] dark view of the country and it has

[22:05] infected clearly a a huge portion of the

[22:09] Republican party like the party that

[22:10] used to feel that we were you know the

[22:14] hope of the world now oh you think we're

[22:17] so innocent oh everybody's a killer

[22:19] everybody uh everybody murders their

[22:21] political Foos we have denes duza today

[22:24] saying that Trump is Naval that that

[22:27] Biden is poop and that that he's being

[22:29] persecuted not just dest Jus is saying

[22:32] that uh Ben here's Lee zeldon Lee zelden

[22:36] one of the good Republicans famous

[22:38] moderate Republicans yeah um as the

[22:41] world reflects on the murder of Alexi

[22:43] naly at the hands of Putin it's worth

[22:45] remembering the Democrats are actively

[22:47] doing Biden's bidding as they also try

[22:49] to imprison his chief political opponent

[22:51] Donald

[22:53] Trump I mean this just disgusting moral

[22:57] equ equivalence has like has infected so

[23:01] much of the party that I I just how do

[23:04] you disinfect like I is is a

[23:07] disinfectant even possible once you've

[23:09] got to this dark of a place

[23:12] so in I mean there I think there's two

[23:15] answers to that and one is one relates

[23:18] to the criminal justice system and the

[23:21] other relates to the political culture

[23:23] and the answer with respect to the

[23:26] political system is that the US uh or

[23:30] sorry the answer with respect to the

[23:32] justice system is that if you can watch

[23:35] the proceedings against naali and watch

[23:37] the proceedings against Donald Trump and

[23:40] see them as equivalent then you are uh

[23:46] really really misunderstanding both the

[23:48] Russian justice system and its function

[23:51] and the American justice system and its

[23:54] function these are it's a very that's a

[23:55] very nice way to put that I would right

[23:58] I would say the the Russian justice

[24:00] system is is a fukan nightmare it is an

[24:05] instrument of the repressive powers of

[24:08] the state and nothing more than that uh

[24:11] the American justice system has its

[24:14] problems um but you know Donald Trump is

[24:17] getting four Fair trials in four

[24:20] different jurisdictions supervised by

[24:22] four different judges state and federal

[24:26] and he will have an ample opportunity to

[24:29] prove himself innocent of each and every

[24:32] one of the 91 uh felony counts that has

[24:36] been directed against him and by the way

[24:38] I don't believe he'll actually he may

[24:39] not be convicted of all of them right

[24:41] they they're actually in doubt the

[24:43] burden is actually on the prosecution

[24:47] and so I think if you you know if part

[24:51] of the answer to your question has to

[24:53] lie in the system playing out and we get

[24:57] to the end we get to him being convicted

[25:00] on X number and acquitted or dropped on

[25:03] y number and people get to look at the

[25:06] result and say do I think that result

[25:09] has Integrity the answer in the

[25:11] political system is way harder in in my

[25:14] view because I don't know how do you

[25:17] convince a political culture that it has

[25:21] Integrity that its systems have

[25:23] integrity and in the face of a

[25:26] Relentless multi Year campaign of

[25:30] delegitimization that includes you know

[25:32] Desh duza saying these things and Lee

[25:35] zeldon saying these things uh how do

[25:39] you how do you keep people having

[25:43] confidence in the fact that the US

[25:47] system and the Russian system are not

[25:49] the same that Joe Biden isn't out there

[25:53] murdering his political opponents by the

[25:55] way he's supposed to be too old and

[25:58] scile to be out there killing people um

[26:01] uh you know how do you convince there he

[26:04] his own son is being investigated by the

[26:06] doj right it is hard and this is the

[26:08] part that is so frustrating and and just

[26:10] when you think about the disintegration

[26:12] for another interview that might be

[26:14] coming down people's Pike in a in in a

[26:16] while I I was rewatching the Palin

[26:19] kurick interview last night and um and

[26:23] for as bad as Sarah Palin was in that

[26:25] interview and it was astonishing how bad

[26:28] she was upon rewatch it was kind of

[26:30] worse than I remembered really and uh

[26:32] still the the talking points were much

[26:36] more in the mainstream of where the

[26:39] American Pol is she talks about Reagan

[26:43] and The Shining City on the hill when

[26:44] the issue of American leadership comes

[26:46] up she talks about the threat from Putin

[26:49] she talks about worries about climate

[26:51] change and you fast forward to this week

[26:55] and Sarah Palin did you see this Sarah

[26:57] Palin put puts up a meme that is um it's

[27:01] it's like Tucker and and Putin's face uh

[27:06] superimposed on two people that are

[27:08] smiling looking over a a grave and on

[27:12] the gravestone it says the media and the

[27:14] Democrats and it's it's like this woman

[27:17] who was on the vice presidential ticket

[27:19] whatever you think about her you know

[27:22] how how much of a clown she's become now

[27:24] is not someone with no influence and

[27:27] she's just a couple of days ago putting

[27:29] out like literally cheerleading the idea

[27:34] that that Vladimir Putin should can is

[27:37] is murdering journalists and and days

[27:41] after she does that he he murders

[27:44] allegedly the opposition leader

[27:47] political leader and we're already

[27:50] seeing in the response wagon circling

[27:52] around this right like if you if that

[27:54] something that Stark if that Stark of a

[27:56] foot imagine if you put out a joke about

[27:58] killing somebody and then two days later

[28:00] it happened you know if that doesn't

[28:02] shake you into reality you know what is

[28:05] going to shake these people nothing well

[28:07] I I also think you know after after mass

[28:11] shootings when there's a political

[28:13] violence to the mass shooting we always

[28:15] you know have a okay is it Bernie

[28:18] Sanders's fault that somebody shot up

[28:21] the Congressional baseball game is it

[28:23] Donald Trump's fault that there was a

[28:25] Pulse Nightclub shooting right um I

[28:28] don't I never know how to think about

[28:30] those questions but I do think that we

[28:34] should ask a causal question here about

[28:37] Tucker's trip um which is you know if

[28:41] you're Vladimir Putin and you're you've

[28:45] kind of made a decision that you'll kill

[28:47] naali at the most opportune moment but

[28:51] you do want to time it because there's

[28:53] going to be some

[28:55] backlash and then Congress Congress goes

[28:58] on a four month stall on Ukraine Aid and

[29:03] so you really have this perception that

[29:05] the American political system is

[29:08] weakening in its resolve uh to confront

[29:12] you and then in the middle of that one

[29:15] of the most prominent Russia apologists

[29:18] in the in in the United States second

[29:21] only to Donald Trump himself shows up in

[29:24] MOS kiss your ass really maybe first can

[29:27] we play let's let's just listen to

[29:29] Tucker I'm bad like let's just listen to

[29:31] Tucker at the grocery store I'm sure I'm

[29:32] sure most people have heard it but we

[29:34] should just let's just all do it

[29:35] together because really it should be a

[29:37] communal experience Jason can we hear

[29:39] Tucker at a Russian grocery store if you

[29:42] take people's standard of living and you

[29:44] tank it through filth and crime and

[29:46] inflation and they literally can't buy

[29:48] the groceries they want at that point

[29:51] maybe it matters less what you say or

[29:53] whether you're a good person or a bad

[29:54] person you're wrecking people's lives in

[29:56] their country and and that's what our

[29:57] leaders have done to us and coming to a

[30:00] Russian grocery store the heart of evil

[30:02] and seeing what things cost and how

[30:04] people live it will radicalize you

[30:07] against our leaders that's how I feel

[30:09] anyway

[30:10] radicalized we're not making any of this

[30:12] up by the way at all not making it up

[30:15] Ben not making it up in a country where

[30:17] 25% of the population doesn't have

[30:19] running water by the way um look I don't

[30:24] think it's unreasonable to ask the

[30:26] question

[30:28] did Vladimir Putin take the current

[30:31] posture of the

[30:33] GOP uh both in Congress and with

[30:36] Tucker's visit and with you know

[30:39] everything Sarah Palin's doing you put

[30:41] it all together did he take it as a sign

[30:44] that this is a good moment to to do this

[30:48] I I don't I don't know how to evaluate

[30:50] that but I do wake up this morning

[30:53] wondering about it my response to that

[30:55] is kind of like doesn't that give too

[30:56] much agent to Putin is is is is really

[31:00] is maybe the Heart of Darkness in all of

[31:02] us not all not not all of us the whole

[31:05] country but is not the Heart of Darkness

[31:07] in in Tucker did did not Donald Trump

[31:10] reveal a darkness that was already

[31:13] within because of course but but my my

[31:17] point is when we act like shills for him

[31:22] he takes it as a signal he takes it as

[31:26] an these are these are not things that

[31:30] don't affect his thinking of what he can

[31:32] get away with when you stand up to him

[31:36] uh he takes that as a signal when you

[31:39] pucker your lips and kiss his ass he

[31:42] takes that as a

[31:44] signal he's getting a lot of good

[31:46] signals heting a lot of good signals all

[31:49] right I want to move on you're the Trump

[31:51] trials man we have two Trump trials

[31:52] updates but I just I like it is so

[31:56] enraging

[31:57] to the the Tucker thing as we sit here

[32:00] and listen to it and discuss it in the

[32:01] context of nality you know I I've I've

[32:03] been watching all these Tucker videos

[32:05] and kind of laughing at him right

[32:07] because there's there's something funny

[32:08] about it like the absurdity of Tucker

[32:10] this supposed man of the people

[32:13] who's apparently never heard of the idea

[32:15] that of of the grocery cart machines

[32:18] where you put in a quarter and and you

[32:20] have to you have to put in the quarter

[32:22] again on the back end in order to put it

[32:24] back like like he's never had a paid

[32:25] grocery cart he's never seen that before

[32:27] never been to an airport I guess um so

[32:29] there is some absurdity in Tu and you

[32:31] know Tucker going into one uh Metro

[32:34] station be like wow this is pretty

[32:36] Russia must be great but yeah I I just

[32:39] want to point out that those people have

[32:41] been being

[32:43] impressed with those Metro stations you

[32:46] know since the Stalin era and uh in in a

[32:51] fashion that they then impute to Russia

[32:53] in general and miss things like the

[32:56] great Ukraine ukan famine right because

[32:59] they're really impressed with a subway

[33:01] station like this is really old

[33:06] that he's falling for and um and yeah

[33:10] people in the nice parts of Moscow live

[33:14] way better than people in the rest of

[33:17] the largest country in the world yeah he

[33:19] should go visit the Nebraska or the

[33:21] Maine or the Alabama of Russia and see

[33:23] what see what what he think should drive

[33:25] a 100 miles out of Moscow 50 miles out

[33:28] of Moscow yeah but the thing is um he

[33:32] isn't falling for it and that's that's

[33:34] the thing he's not falling for it like

[33:36] Tucker is a very smart person um it's

[33:39] very evident in his writing and and and

[33:42] back when he did interviews that were

[33:43] not the type of interview that he did

[33:45] last week like he is a malevolent person

[33:49] that has decided that um out of either

[33:53] grievance towards his fellow Americans

[33:57] for some reason or out of uh uh hatred

[34:01] that he did not you know that he does

[34:03] not get the treatment among the American

[34:05] Elites that he wishes that he did or

[34:08] just out of desire for money or fame or

[34:10] because he's a troll or because

[34:12] he's a niist whatever what whatever

[34:14] motivations you want to impute on it is

[34:16] a person that knows better and is now

[34:19] out there being the number one

[34:23] propagandist for a just homicidal Maniac

[34:27] that just murdered his political

[34:29] opponents and that is uh uh uh

[34:31] kidnapping children that has invaded

[34:33] another country and like the the lack of

[34:37] just total rage and disgust among the

[34:43] Republican Elites and and Tucker's other

[34:45] friends and allies is the thing that is

[34:47] like the most to me disheartening about

[34:49] that because the response should like I

[34:51] and I'm guilty of this the response

[34:53] should not be laughter or or you know

[34:56] what it should be rage it's ra it's

[34:58] enraging I I completely agree and I do

[35:02] also agree with uh your friend Carville

[35:07] that mocking them is actually important

[35:10] um thank you for listening on my first

[35:12] week no I I I listen to them all um and

[35:16] look I believe in mockery I'm the guy

[35:19] who projects you know body on on

[35:22] embassies around the world um I think

[35:24] mockery is a really important thing it

[35:27] plays an important role but you don't

[35:29] confuse the mockery with your internal

[35:32] emotional response because the mockery

[35:35] is what you're what you're projecting no

[35:38] pun intended at them the rage is what's

[35:42] driving the mockery and you know I have

[35:46] to I spend a lot of time with real

[35:50] ukrainians and I find myself

[35:53] increasingly having to explain the

[35:55] behavior of my country to them and they

[35:59] are not like Tucker and Trump they

[36:03] actually believe in America in this yes

[36:06] in this

[36:07] really pardon me innocent way we're the

[36:11] people who confronted the Soviet Union

[36:14] we're the people who organize NATO we're

[36:18] democracy and you know relatively

[36:21] non-corrupt capitalism We're The Shield

[36:24] of the democratic world and try to

[36:28] explain Tucker

[36:30] Carlson and Donald Trump and why why

[36:34] does Donald Trump hate Ukraine to a

[36:38] table full of ukrainians and it has

[36:40] something to do right it has something

[36:42] to do with

[36:43] barisma personal pettiness right it's

[36:47] this little little while they are

[36:51] trying to keep their country independent

[36:54] and trying to get 20,000 kids back back

[36:56] and not lose as many people as they are

[37:00] as they can save and you know it's a

[37:04] very enraging thing when you've had had

[37:08] to have that conversation for the 50th

[37:12] time and yeah you know half of the the

[37:16] half of the country's behavior in this

[37:19] space not half 30% is really inexcusable

[37:25] and you know as somebody who spends a

[37:27] lot of time trying to help ukrainians

[37:30] navigate our crazy political system just

[37:34] try to try to explain it to a

[37:38] hypothetical 22-year-old Ukrainian kid

[37:41] who's uh who who doesn't understand like

[37:46] what Fox News is or who Tucker Carlson

[37:49] is just try and it's sad it's sad we're

[37:53] running out of time and just the thing

[37:54] is um the inverse of that was just was

[37:58] once true it was one of the most

[37:59] inspiring things when I was working for

[38:00] McCain Mark Salter as speech writer you

[38:03] know would tell me stories of traveling

[38:04] mcain all over the world and and it was

[38:07] these types of people the 22y old

[38:09] ukrainians uh the 22y old Georgians uh

[38:12] people in countries that had uh

[38:15] autocrats of their own and they knew

[38:17] they KN you know the McCain brand the

[38:19] American brand it meant something it

[38:21] meant that oh they will be on our side

[38:23] they will be on our side and now these

[38:24] people have to feel like no there's a

[38:27] big portion of the country that's on the

[38:28] side of the of the murder and the death

[38:30] spot okay uh this is you're supposed to

[38:32] be here for Trump trials two very brief

[38:34] Trump trial updates that um I just want

[38:36] to uh get in um yesterday uh Trump

[38:40] appointed special counsel this is

[38:41] related to the topic at hand David Weiss

[38:44] um uh is charging Alexander smaroff I

[38:48] feel like the the script writers are a

[38:50] little on the nose here um uh by naming

[38:53] him smear off age 43 with ly to the FBI

[38:58] and creating false records he was

[38:59] arrested also a little on the nose at

[39:02] Harry Reid international airport in Las

[39:04] Vegas um what he's charged with uh Ben

[39:07] is uh is basically

[39:10] fabricating um the the notion that uh he

[39:14] was talking about barisma business deal

[39:16] dealings with Biden with with Hunter and

[39:19] with Joe Biden when Biden was vice

[39:20] president right I guess and and who

[39:22] knows what's true at this point if a

[39:23] liar is a liar but at some point you

[39:25] know there there was evidence that they

[39:27] had spoken about it after you know

[39:28] during the period when Trump was

[39:29] president when Biden was a private

[39:31] citizen uh but he fabricated uh to

[39:33] investigators the idea that these

[39:35] conversations were going when Biden was

[39:37] vice president obviously a big

[39:38] difference um and so uh you know this

[39:41] guy was mentioned I believe on the

[39:43] Hannity Show 82 time maybe not by name

[39:45] but like this claim was was mentioned on

[39:47] Hannity 82 92 times something like that

[39:49] he's been a star witness for comr

[39:52] another one bites the dust here on the

[39:54] hunter Biden investigation yeah yeah so

[39:56] I have two things to say about this and

[39:59] I have not followed this case especially

[40:01] closely because I was glued to the

[40:04] television for the fonny Willis show

[40:06] yesterday um but um look there's two

[40:10] really important points first of all the

[40:12] prosecutor who has brought this case is

[40:15] the same prosecutor who's Prosecuting uh

[40:19] Hunter Biden it's the special special

[40:21] counsel David Weiss so in other words

[40:23] this is somebody who's trying to make a

[40:25] case against

[40:27] Biden and this witness fabricates this

[40:31] stuff and he ends up Prosecuting him uh

[40:34] so you know that'll give you an idea of

[40:38] you know this is a presumably a

[40:40] receptive audience to somebody who's uh

[40:43] you know got a claim of of a demand of a

[40:46] big bribe from from uh somebody about

[40:50] Hunter and Joe Biden and yet uh he turns

[40:54] around and prosecutes him that'll give

[40:55] you an idea of how credible this story

[40:59] was um the second thing is you know the

[41:05] entire there there's two sides of the

[41:07] hunter Biden Story one is the side that

[41:10] you know Hunter Biden was an addict and

[41:15] uh engaged in all sorts of shady stuff

[41:17] and traded on his father's name and uh

[41:21] you know got himself into a fair bit of

[41:23] trouble legal trouble um the second

[41:27] aspect of it was that this was somehow a

[41:30] larger story about Joe Biden than about

[41:33] Hunter Biden yeah and the different

[41:36] bricks in that story have all turned out

[41:39] to be um and it doesn't stop

[41:43] comr from talking about the Biden crime

[41:46] family it doesn't talk about um but you

[41:50] know no component of it ends up being

[41:53] true for the simple reason I think that

[41:56] Joe Biden isn't corrupt what whatever

[41:59] else he is he's old he's uh he's um you

[42:03] know he is what he is and he appears to

[42:05] have mishandled classified information

[42:07] but he's not a he's not a corrupt guy

[42:10] taking bribes um and so what happens is

[42:14] they get very excited about these people

[42:17] who have some story to tell and then

[42:19] they turn out to be charlatans or they

[42:21] turned out to not tell the stories that

[42:23] they claim they tell or the um and it's

[42:25] a very consistent pattern now over time

[42:29] that should make you be uh real careful

[42:34] with the uh you know Hanes and comr of

[42:39] the world who are trying to make Hunter

[42:42] Biden be about Joe Biden and this was

[42:44] obvious from the start the barisma thing

[42:46] was so obvious from the start the whole

[42:48] the whole conspiracy theory I've been

[42:50] writing about this for years uh we could

[42:51] do a whole episode maybe we will this

[42:53] year on the absurdity of the barisma

[42:55] conspiracy okay um the Fon Willis

[42:59] situation has been so depressing and

[43:00] dispiriting to me that I was not able to

[43:02] watch it um just because I'm like I hate

[43:06] anything that that gives Donald Trump a

[43:08] hammer to beat us with uh us being the

[43:12] pro- Democracy Pro rule of law side of

[43:14] things so we've got about three to five

[43:16] minutes here so since I was too

[43:18] depressed to watch and you were glued to

[43:20] it I'm just going to put a quarter in

[43:21] the in the machine and let you kind of

[43:24] get get us up to speed

[43:26] well

[43:27] so the bottom line uh the hearing is

[43:31] still going on today and it is a mark of

[43:34] my uh deep uh respect for you that I am

[43:38] here rather than watching it now um this

[43:40] was the best like my babysitter during

[43:43] OJ she would never she didn't turn she

[43:44] didn't turn off Court TV back in uh for

[43:47] for like an entire week this is better

[43:50] TV than than Court TV at its best during

[43:53] the OJ trial um uh for so look fonny

[43:58] Willis has a a bit of a problem but I I

[44:02] think she actually solved most of it

[44:04] herself yesterday um uh she had this

[44:09] relationship with uh a guy she had hired

[44:13] as special prosecutor in this case

[44:15] Nathan Wade Nathan Wade took the stand

[44:18] yesterday the issue is whether there's

[44:20] some conflict of interest as a result of

[44:22] their financial Arrangements through

[44:24] this affair he took the stand and was I

[44:28] thought completely

[44:30] incredible um claimed that he had gone

[44:34] they had gone on vacation together um

[44:37] but you know she'd paid him back for

[44:40] everything in cash um and

[44:45] um the court also heard testimony from a

[44:50] former friend of fonnie Willis who's

[44:53] apartment she had taken over who claimed

[44:57] that Wade and Willis had been dating

[45:00] much earlier than they've acknowledged

[45:02] and the significance of that would be

[45:04] that it's much worse if she hired the

[45:06] person she was sleeping with than if she

[45:09] hired somebody and then they later in a

[45:12] context of a professional relationship

[45:14] started to have a romantic relationship

[45:16] so things around two o'clock in the

[45:19] afternoon look really bad for fonnie and

[45:22] then she charges into the courtroom and

[45:26] demands to

[45:27] testify and I have never seen somebody

[45:31] take over a courtroom like she did she

[45:35] she comes in she sits down and she talks

[45:40] about why she always keeps cash around

[45:43] her apartment and she is as compelling

[45:47] as he was apparently evasive and I think

[45:51] by the end of the day she had really

[45:54] saved the situation

[45:56] um and I don't know what's going on

[45:59] there today or whether the situation is

[46:02] going to be uh end up being bad again

[46:07] but I do have the impression that there

[46:09] is no basis to disqualify her after both

[46:13] Nathan Wade's and her sworn testimony

[46:16] and so that's a little tentative because

[46:19] like they are literally in court right

[46:21] now um but I think um I think this is

[46:24] going to end up being a bit of a tempest

[46:26] in a teapot but it was a heck of a

[46:29] tempest Tempest a great an entertaining

[46:31] Tempest I mean it's got some Parry Mason

[46:34] it's got some General Hospital it's got

[46:37] some House of

[46:39] Cards great daytime television I'm gonna

[46:42] take your word for this but look you we

[46:44] got to have our our you know p's and q's

[46:47] in order here Ben you know I like and

[46:49] this is so I'm thinking about this

[46:50] through the comms guy hat we're giving

[46:53] him a lot of fodder to bleet there's a

[46:55] lot of bleeding fodder right now and

[46:57] there's a some delays we're giving him

[46:59] some delaying opportunities and some

[47:02] bleeding fod there is no doubt that if

[47:05] fonny Willis had come to me and say Wht

[47:08] us you know you're you're a good Gray

[47:10] beard on this sh not that I have a Gray

[47:12] beard but you like should I have an

[47:16] affair with the special prosecutor and

[47:19] reimburse him for joint travel with wads

[47:22] of cash I would have said no part of

[47:26] that sounds like a good plan um but that

[47:30] you know and like you'll it's going to

[47:32] come out you're going to get your ass

[47:34] kicked over this you're gonna have

[47:36] litigation over this and it's going to

[47:38] let Trump change the subject that's what

[47:40] I would have said but she didn't consult

[47:42] me in advance about this neither did

[47:44] Nathan Wade he also didn't ask me how he

[47:47] should answer his divorce uh

[47:51] interrogatories so like nobody consulted

[47:54] me on this part I would have suggested

[47:56] they handle it differently um that's not

[48:00] the question on the table right now the

[48:02] question on the table right now is is

[48:04] she gonna get disqualified from the case

[48:06] and is Donald Trump gonna gonna reap a

[48:09] real uh winfall from this and I I think

[48:14] you could eat these words but I think

[48:16] the answer is no Ben wit us thank you

[48:19] for coming out of the bullpen today it's

[48:21] like uh all my baseball references are

[48:23] 20 years old I don't watch baseball

[48:24] anymore but your Mariana Rivera or 30

[48:27] years old Dennis eesley you know coming

[48:29] out of the pen and just doing a

[48:31] wonderful job Goose gosage closing out

[48:34] the week with us and uh I'm very very

[48:37] grateful for your expertise and for

[48:38] doing this and we'll be talking to you

[48:41] [Music]

[48:54] soon

Link copied to clipboard!