Up Next
Charlie Kirk Questions Why Russia Is Our Enemy on the Thousandth Day of Unnecessary War
15:08
Charlie Kirk and David Sacks Expose Biden Administration's Ukraine Obsession Over American Priorities
5:25
Charlie Kirk Faces Cambridge Students on Trump Foreign Policy and Middle East Conflicts
32:01
Ben Wittes on Alexei Navalny's Death Tucker Carlson's Grotesque Putin Propaganda and GOP Moral Collapse
Ben Wittes joins Tim Miller to discuss the reported death of Russian opposition leader Alexei Navalny in a remote Arctic penal colony, presumably murdered by Vladimir Putin. Wittes refuses to accept passive language around Navalny's death and insists on calling it what it is: assassination. The conversation turns to Tucker Carlson's propaganda tour in Russia, his grocery store theater, and his astonishing claim that "leadership requires killing people." Wittes and Miller examine the moral rot spreading through the Republican Party, from Tucker's Putin cheerleading to members of Congress comparing Trump's legal troubles to Navalny's murder. They also cover updates on the fabricated Biden-Burisma allegations and the Fani Willis hearing in Georgia. This is a searing discussion about courage, cowardice, and what America once stood for to dissidents around the world.
The Reported Death of Alexei Navalny
Ben Wittes begins by refusing to accept the Russian government's narrative at face value. While Russian state media claims Navalny collapsed and died during a walk at the polar wolf Arctic penal colony where he was serving a three-decade sentence, Wittes insists on waiting for confirmation from Navalny's own organization before accepting it as fact. As a matter of principle, he does not accept any factual representations from the Russian government.
Assuming the reports are true, Wittes is adamant about the language used to describe what happened. "We should not say that he collapsed and died on a walk at a penal colony," Wittes states. "He was murdered by Vladimir Putin." At minimum, Putin murdered him by placing him in conditions where death was highly probable. Wittes notes the persistent allegations that Navalny was being poisoned or mistreated, and argues against using passive voice or making Navalny the subject rather than the object of the sentence.
Navalny, other than Volodymyr Zelenskyy, was Vladimir Putin's single most important enemy in the world. He voluntarily returned to Russia after having been poisoned with Novichok, even revealing publicly how the poisoning was carried out. His imprisonment and disappearance was an effort to kill him and remove him from Russian politics, and the West should not let Putin get away with sanitizing the cause of death.
Navalny's wife Yulia, speaking at the Munich Security Conference, stated that if the reports are true, she wants Putin, his entourage, his friends, and his government to know they will be held responsible for what they have done to her country, her family, and her husband, and that day will come very soon.
Navalny's Unique Position in Russian Opposition
Wittes emphasizes that if true, Navalny's death represents a devastating blow to Russian opposition movements. The Russian opposition has long struggled with co-opted figures, ultra-nationalists, and straightforward people whom Putin has simply murdered, most famously Boris Nemtsov. While you can kill a person but not kill a dream, Wittes notes, killing enough people makes a pretty significant impact on the dream.
Navalny was special because he had an ability to communicate not just with elite Russian liberals, but with ordinary Russians angry about government corruption and oligarchs amassing fortunes while building palaces. He was exceptionally talented at addressing issues Russians actually cared about. His loss represents a significant blow to the idea of a genuinely democratic opposition in Russia that does not aspire to imperial conquest of half of Europe.
Wittes presents a partial list of Putin critics and opponents who have mysteriously died or been targeted: Navalny twice, Magnitsky, Khangoshvili shot in Berlin in 2019, Skripal poisoned in 2018, Sergei Skripal and his daughter in Britain in 2018, and Nemtsov in 2015. But Navalny stands apart. He is certainly the most important since Nemtsov and may be more important. Unlike many obscure victims, Navalny was not obscure in the West. Just weeks before, when he disappeared in prison and concerns grew that he was dead, the hashtag where is Navalny trended globally, and Secretary of State Blinken spoke about it publicly before the Russians released proof of life.
What Can the United States Do?
Wittes acknowledges there is limited direct action the United States can take. This is internal to Russia, literally happening in a penal colony in the deepest reaches of Siberia. The U.S. has already imposed significant pressure on Russia due to Ukraine, freezing assets and seizing yachts. There are not many more levers to pull that have not already been used.
What can be done is talking about it extensively. Wittes plans to project the word "murderers" on the Russian Embassy. At both senior government levels and individual levels, people should discuss this case, play clips of Navalny, and share the videos he made. These are astonishing pieces of investigative work, though many are in Russian because Russians were the intended audience. People should learn about what Navalny and his organization accomplished and remember it the next time Tucker Carlson suggests we should listen to Putin.
In a sane world, if Republicans were holding up Ukraine aid and Putin murdered his most important critic, cooler heads would prevail and the Speaker would call an immediate vote for unconditional Ukraine aid so Putin does not get the windfall of congressional inaction on top of murdering his chief critic. But this is not an entirely sane world. For many like Mike Johnson and Tucker Carlson, this might just show the need for more dialogue with Putin. Some might even suggest Putin only killed Navalny because the West has not been nice enough to him.
Wittes worries people will cram the news into their own preconceptions. Nevertheless, this should concentrate minds. Putin is murderous at the national level, personal level, and state institutional level. The United States has to be more like Adam Kinzinger than Mike Johnson about this and put domestic considerations aside to pass the Ukraine supplemental.
Tucker Carlson's Grotesque Propaganda
During the conversation, Tucker Carlson appears live at the World Government Summit 2024. When challenged about not asking Putin about freedom of speech in Russia, Navalny, assassinations, or restrictions on opposition in coming elections, Carlson responds with a stunning statement: "Every leader kills people, including my leader. Every leader kills people. Some kill more than others. Leadership requires killing people. Sorry, it's why I wouldn't want to be a leader."
Carlson continues that press restriction is universal, claiming there is more censorship in Russia than the United States but a great deal in the United States. He says people can decide what countries or systems they think are better, but he just wanted to know what Putin thinks.
Wittes states bluntly: "There is nothing we can do about the Tuckers of the world. There is something we can do about the Mike Johnsons of the world." That involves a maximum pressure campaign to get Johnson to hold a vote on Ukraine aid, and the Navalny story, if true, should work as a significant weapon in that effort. He is confident Navalny would want that as well. In the longer term, these people who do not understand the need to stand up to Vladimir Putin need to be removed from power through electoral means.
The exchange reminds Miller of Trump's 2016 interview with Bill O'Reilly, when O'Reilly asked about Putin's assassinations and Trump responded, "You think our country's so innocent? We've got a lot of killers." This mindset has infected a huge portion of the Republican Party. The party that once felt America was the hope of the world now says, "You think we're so innocent? Everybody's a killer."
The GOP's Moral Collapse and Grotesque Comparisons
The moral equivalence has spread shockingly far. Dinesh D'Souza claims Trump is Navalny and Biden is Putin, that Trump is being persecuted. Even Lee Zeldin, known as a moderate Republican, tweets: "As the world reflects on the murder of Alexei Navalny at the hands of Putin, it's worth remembering the Democrats are actively doing Biden's bidding as they also try to imprison his chief political opponent Donald Trump."
Wittes addresses this disgusting moral equivalence by pointing to the stark differences between the Russian and American justice systems. If you can watch proceedings against Navalny and proceedings against Trump and see them as equivalent, you fundamentally misunderstand both systems. The Russian justice system is an instrument of repressive state power and nothing more. The American justice system has problems, but Trump is getting four fair trials in four different jurisdictions supervised by four different judges, state and federal. He will have ample opportunity to prove himself innocent of each of the 91 felony counts. He may not even be convicted of all of them. The burden is actually on the prosecution.
Part of the answer lies in letting the system play out so people can evaluate whether the results have integrity. The harder challenge is the political system. How do you convince a political culture that it has integrity and that its systems have integrity in the face of a relentless multi-year campaign of delegitimization? How do you keep people confident that the U.S. system and Russian system are not the same, that Joe Biden is not out murdering political opponents? Biden is supposed to be too old and senile to be killing people, and his own son is being investigated by the DOJ.
Miller rewatched the Sarah Palin Katie Couric interview and notes that as bad as Palin was, her talking points were much more mainstream. She talked about Reagan and the shining city on a hill, the threat from Putin, worries about climate change. Fast forward to this week and Sarah Palin posts a meme with Tucker and Putin's faces superimposed on two people smiling over a grave marked "the media and the Democrats." This woman who was on a vice presidential ticket is cheerleading the idea that Putin is murdering journalists, and days later he allegedly murders the opposition political leader.
Did Putin Time Navalny's Death Around Tucker's Visit?
Wittes raises a causal question about Tucker's trip. If you are Vladimir Putin and you have decided to kill Navalny at the most opportune moment, you want to time it because there will be backlash. Congress has stalled on Ukraine aid for four months, creating a perception that the American political system is weakening in its resolve to confront Russia. Then one of the most prominent Russia apologists in the United States, second only to or perhaps even ahead of Donald Trump, shows up in Moscow to kiss Putin's behind. Did Putin take the current GOP posture, Tucker's visit, Sarah Palin's activities, and everything together as a sign this is a good moment?
When you act like shills for Putin, he takes it as a signal. When you stand up to him, he takes that as a signal. When you pucker your lips and kiss his behind, he takes that as a signal. He is getting a lot of good signals right now.
Miller shares his disgust at Tucker's grocery store video, where Tucker claims that seeing Russian grocery prices and how people live will "radicalize you against our leaders." This is in a country where 25% of the population does not have running water. People have been impressed with Moscow Metro stations since the Stalin era while missing things like the Ukrainian famine because they were impressed with subway stations. Tucker should drive 50 or 100 miles out of Moscow and see what he thinks then.
But Miller and Wittes agree Tucker is not actually falling for anything. Tucker is a very smart person, evident in his writing and in interviews that were not like his Putin interview. He is a malevolent person who has decided, whether out of grievance toward fellow Americans, hatred that he does not get the treatment among American elites he wishes, desire for money or fame, trolling, or nihilism, to become the number one propagandist for a homicidal maniac who just murdered his political opponent, is kidnapping children, and has invaded another country. The lack of rage and disgust among Republican elites and Tucker's friends and allies is most disheartening.
Explaining America's Betrayal to Ukrainians
Wittes spends significant time with actual Ukrainians and increasingly has to explain his country's behavior to them. They are not like Tucker and Trump. They actually believe in America in an innocent way as the people who confronted the Soviet Union, organized NATO, represent democracy and relatively non-corrupt capitalism, and are the shield of the democratic world. Try explaining Tucker Carlson and Donald Trump and why Trump hates Ukraine to a table full of Ukrainians. It has something to do with Burisma and personal pettiness while they are trying to keep their country independent, get 20,000 kidnapped children back, and save as many lives as possible. It is enraging when you have had that conversation for the 50th time. Half the country's behavior, or 30%, is inexcusable.
Miller reflects that the inverse was once true and one of the most inspiring things. Mark Salter, McCain's speechwriter, would tell stories of traveling with McCain all over the world. The 22-year-old Ukrainians and Georgians in countries with their own autocrats knew the McCain brand, the American brand. It meant something. It meant they will be on our side. Now these people have to feel like a big portion of the country is on the side of the murderer and the despot.
Alexander Smirnov Charged with Fabricating Biden-Burisma Claims
In Trump trial updates, Trump-appointed special counsel David Weiss charged Alexander Smirnov, age 43, with lying to the FBI and creating false records. He was arrested at Harry Reid International Airport in Las Vegas. Smirnov is charged with fabricating the notion that he discussed Burisma business dealings with Hunter and Joe Biden when Biden was vice president. There was evidence conversations happened when Biden was a private citizen during the Trump presidency, but Smirnov fabricated to investigators that conversations occurred when Biden was vice president, an obviously significant difference. This claim was mentioned on the Hannity Show 82 times and Smirnov was a star witness for House Oversight Committee investigations.
Wittes points out the prosecutor bringing the case is the same prosecutor prosecuting Hunter Biden, special counsel David Weiss. Someone trying to make a case against Biden, presented with a witness claiming a big bribe demand involving Hunter and Joe Biden, turned around and prosecuted the witness. That gives an idea of how credible the story was.
There are two sides to the Hunter Biden story. One is that Hunter was an addict who engaged in shady behavior, traded on his father's name, and got into legal trouble. The second aspect was that this was somehow a larger story about Joe Biden than Hunter Biden. The different elements of that story have all turned out to be false. It does not stop House Oversight from talking about the Biden crime family, but no component ends up being true for the simple reason that Joe Biden is not corrupt. Whatever else he is—old, what he is—he appears to have mishandled classified information but is not a corrupt guy taking bribes. They get excited about people with stories to tell who turn out to be charlatans or do not tell the stories claimed. This consistent pattern should make people careful with the Jim Jordans and James Comers trying to make Hunter Biden about Joe Biden. The Burisma conspiracy theory was obvious from the start.
Fani Willis Takes the Stand
Wittes was glued to the Fani Willis hearing, calling it better television than Court TV at its best during the O.J. trial. Fani Willis has a problem but Wittes believes she solved most of it herself. She had a relationship with Nathan Wade, whom she hired as special prosecutor in the Trump Georgia case. The issue is whether there is a conflict of interest from their financial arrangements through the affair.
Wade took the stand and was completely incredible in Wittes's assessment. He claimed they had gone on vacations together but she paid him back for everything in cash. The court heard testimony from a former friend of Willis, whose apartment she had taken over, claiming Wade and Willis had been dating much earlier than they acknowledged. The significance is that it is much worse if she hired someone she was sleeping with than if they started a romantic relationship after a professional relationship began.
Things looked bad for Willis around 2 p.m., then she charged into the courtroom and demanded to testify. Wittes has never seen someone take over a courtroom like she did. She talked about why she always keeps cash around her apartment and was as compelling as Wade was evasive. By the end of the day, she had saved the situation. Wittes believes there is no basis to disqualify her after both sworn testimonies, though the hearing continued the next day. He thinks this will end up being a tempest in a teapot, though an entertaining one with elements of Perry Mason, General Hospital, and House of Cards.
If Willis had consulted Wittes asking if she should have an affair with the special prosecutor and reimburse him for joint travel with wads of cash, he would have said no part of that sounds like a good plan. It would come out, she would get beaten up over it, there would be litigation, and it would let Trump change the subject. But she did not consult him, nor did Wade ask how to answer his divorce interrogatories. Nobody consulted Wittes on this, and he would have suggested they handle it differently. But that is not the question. The question is whether she will be disqualified from the case and whether Trump will reap a windfall. Wittes believes the answer is no.
Video Transcript
there is nothing we can do about the
Tuckers of the world there is something
we can do about the Mike Johnson's of
the world and people who don't
understand that you need to uh stand up
to Vladimir
Putin really need to not be in
[Music]
power hello and welcome to the B podcast
I'm your host Tim Miller I'm here with a
guy that you all know all of youve been
around here for a while the the Trump
trials man uh the enl of fun live stream
veteran Brookings Foundation what else
what else do you do Ben wit us law fair
law fair all right law fair that's
that's quite the buzzword these days I
notice on true the and on and in the
president's uh bleet he's been bleeding
about law fair and every time he does it
I I just attach the support law fair
link and and share it because uh you
know why not why not I know every time
he jumps out I like he learned a new
word we maybe we blame you for that a
little bit um okay we brought you in
kind of the last minute here because we
have some uh pretty sad news this
morning Lexi naly Russian President
Vladimir Putin's most formidable
opposition opponent uh collapsed and
died on Friday after a walk at the polar
wolf Arctic penal colony where he'd been
serving a three decade jail
term um he was 47 years old and um I I
guess before uh I get your reaction I
wanted to just take a moment to
appreciate The Bravery of nval who knew
the risks that he was taking going back
to Russia and he talked about why he did
that a few years ago in an interview
with Christian Amur let's listen to that
why do you want to go back and and I
guess do you think you'll be safe when
you go
back well well I don't uh think that I
uh can have such a privilege being safe
in Russia but uh I have to go back
because I don't want these you know
groups of killer exist in Russia I don't
want Putin uh be ruling of Russia I
don't him being president I don't want
him being Z of Russia because well he's
killing people he's a reason why our the
whole country is degradating here's the
reason why people are so poor we have 25
Millions people living below the poverty
line and the whole degradation of system
uh fortunately for me including system
of assination of people uh he's a reason
of that and uh I want to go back and try
to change
it well not a lot of Heroes these days
uh but uh he certainly won uh Ben what's
your reaction to the news this morning
all right so a few things the first is
that I will accept that it is true when
and only when naval's people announce it
what we have right now and it's not that
I doubt that it's true it's that I as a
matter of principle don't accept any
factual representation coming from the
Russian government what we have right
now is a Russian government claim in
their media that he is dead and that the
circumstances you describe are the
circumstances of his death uh so let let
me start with that let's um uh wait
until his people actually confirm it he
has a very developed
organization second thing is that
assuming it is true uh we should not say
that he collapsed and died on a walk at
a penal colony he was murdered uh by
Vladimir Putin um uh at a minimum by
putting him in a in a penal colony in
which uh death is a very likely reaction
uh uh probability we've all been
expecting his uh death uh for a while um
uh but uh you know the persistent
allegations that he was being poisoned
or that he was being
mistreated uh uh have been such that we
shouldn't default to the passive voice
um or to make him the subject
rather than the object of the sentence
this is somebody who is uh other than
volodimir zalinski uh the single most
important enemy of Vladimir Putin in the
world who voluntarily returned
himself uh to Russia after having been
poisoned once um remember he was the
reason he was abroad was that he had
been uh Nova chucked um uh in a fashion
that he then you know revealed how it
was done um uh and so um like we should
not like if he if he was if he is dead
um we should wait for his people to
confirm that and we should also assume
uh irrespective of the uh the uh stated
cause of death his imprisonment and his
dis appearance was an effort to kill him
and remove him from the um from from
Russian politics and we should uh not
let Putin get away with that um uh by
reflecting the causes of death as though
they are not intentionally inflicted my
guess is that the a this that he is dead
is true and B that there is something
more active here than a walk in the park
Park um certainly certainly we're I'm
going to be sending this video as a
sternly worded letter to our friends at
the reuter's wire wire with a lesson
about the passive voice um uh nal's wife
uh Julia is was at the Munich security
conference uh this morning and she spoke
uh in pretty similar terms to what you
just said um uh she caveats at the start
if it's true I want Putin his Entourage
Putin's friends and his government to
know that they will be held responsible
for what they have done to our country
my family and my husband and that day
will come very soon uh Joe Biden in
2021 uh threatened uh Vladimir Putin
about over naval's death um he warned of
devastating consequences for Russia if
Naval dies in prison so let's with with
that caveat that both you and Julia
offered uh let's presume it's true um
what what next what are the implications
well so uh first of all if it's true
it's a devastating blow uh one of the
problems that the Russian opposition has
had over the years is that um you know
there a lot a lot of their people have
turned out to be co-opt in some respect
um some of them have turned out to be
ultra
nationalists uh and the ones who have
been honor straightforward people and
there are a bunch of them um of course
most famously Boris nof um Putin has
just murdered um and you know you
can there's a saying where you can kill
a person but you can't kill a dream but
it actually turns out that if you kill
enough people it makes a pretty big
impact on on the dream and U navali was
a a special figure in that he had an
ability to talk not just to not
principally to Elite Russians um Elite
Russian liberals but
to people who were just angry about the
capacity of the Russian government to
them over and
become gazillionaire oligarchs with
palaces right and he was extremely
talented at um at talking about things
that Russians actually cared about um
and so I I do think if it is true the
the loss to the idea of a Russian
opposition a demo a genuinely Democratic
opposition in Russia that does not
aspire to uh you know to
Imperial conquest of half of Europe it's
a significant blow um what happens next
look there is not that much the United
United States can do about this um this
is very internal to Russia um you know
it's literally in a penal colony and the
deepest darkest reaches of
Siberia um and uh we've already done a
lot of things like freezing assets that
you know as a result of Ukraine and so
it's not that there's a lot of us
potential pressure on Russia that we're
not already exerting we can't take any
more Yachts there aren't any more Yachts
that we can take or I
mean already I would I would hope we've
already taken the Yachts um but what we
can do is talk about it and talk about
it a lot um I plan to uh project the
word murderers on the Russian Embassy
this evening and um uh there will be you
know a a series of protests I'm sure um
and look both at the senior levels of
government and at the individual levels
uh people should talk about it people
should uh play the clips of Naval play
the videos that he made these are
astonishing pieces of kind of
investigative uh I mean a lot of them
they're in Russian because they're we're
not the audience for them but people
should really learn about what it is
that that organization and what he did
um and you know
and remember it the next time Tucker
Carlson tells you that you know we you
may not agree with Putin but we should
listen to it yeah I want I want to get
to our friend Tucker in a second uh uh
just to put a finer point and I pulled
this up a um uh that AG Hamilton was
sharing the partial list of pu Putin
critics or opponents who have
mysteriously died or been targeted or
obviously assassinated over the last few
years at naly now twice prosan Magano uh
Kango shot in Berlin 2019 veroff
poisoned 2018 uh Sergey you're gonna
have to excuse some of my Russian
pronunciations Sergey scrippal and his
daughter uh in in Britain in 18 nsof
which who you mentioned in 15 so this is
something that people know right uh it's
not like a secret that that Putin has
been engaging in these types of
assassinations of his political
opponents but is
is not noal maybe a category difference
from those examples as far as as as
maybe rallying more intense focus and
opposition so I think he's certainly the
most important since nof and he may be
more important than nof um uh a you know
a lot of the people that you mentioned
are people who uh are those not familiar
with contemporary Russian politics those
are named you wouldn't know I mean scle
and his daughter of course are are a
little bit different because it was in
init the UK and and it was somebody that
he had um had been traded uh in a in a
spy exchange but um a most of those
people are relatively obscure uh in the
West on N um nval is not obscure um and
in fact it was only a few weeks ago that
um
you know he disappeared for a while in
that prison and um there was a lot of
concern that he was dead at the time and
the expression G nalni where is naali
was a like a big trending social media
thing um and blinkin talked about it
publicly secretary blinkin and then the
Russians you know let him release a
little video or you know there was a
little like but there was a kind of
proof Proof of Life situation and so
they are not entirely unresponsive to uh
public pressure about him the problem is
that once he is dead the public pressure
is for what right what's the what what's
the accountability that you can demand
for one dead Alexi naal that demanding
for you know 50,000 dead ukrainians and
20,000 uh missing stolen Ukrainian
children uh if you've resisted that
what's the what's the added pressure
that you can do um and look the answer
is that the president of the United
States should talk about it everybody at
the Munich security conference should be
talking about it um and you know people
should exact a price and um I would hope
that companies that are still still
doing business in Russia uh now uh get
the question again uh only with naal
instead of Ukraine as the reason for the
question or in addition to Ukraine so I
look am am I optimistic that there is
some magic lever that will be pulled now
because novali is dead that was not true
because of a full-scale Invasion and
genocidal conduct in Ukraine no do I
think we should all act like there is
yes okay um the the range of Bad actors
um you know this this highlights uh over
here in America particularly well not
just not particularly entirely basically
in the Republican Party um you know goes
from the don't leave out Jill Stein oh
and Jill and our friend Jill the
enablers uh to the propagandas uh before
we get to Tucker and the and Sarah pal
and and denes Duan the worst actors um I
want to highlight something that that
kinzinger uh put up on his substack this
morning uh that Alex Nal Alexi naly was
everything that the GOP isn't uh taking
a stand doesn't have to cost your life
but God forbid you lose your access I do
Wonder let's just put Tucker in that
kind of crowd of comrades over over in a
box for one second um as we look to to
Ukraine Aid and the actual you know
responses that are necessary might
something like this backfire on Putin as
far as forcing you know some of the
spineless weasel the Mike Johnson's of
the world to actually actually finally
act and show show a little backbone do
you see do you see any possible green
shoots there well so look in a sane
world where Republicans were holding up
Ukraine Aid because of the Border but
not because of the border and insisting
on Border legislation but then nixing
border legislation and letting uh uh the
Russians uh overrun AV divka um uh
because the ukrainians don't have enough
artillery in a sane world like that uh
if Putin murdered his most uh important
critic you would think cooler heads
would Prevail and the speaker would
issue uh would call an immediate vote uh
for unconditional
unattached Ukraine AIDS so that uh at
least he doesn't get the windfall of
congressional inaction on top of
murdering his chief critic but if you
haven't noticed him we don't live in an
entirely sane World um we uh live with
in a world in which uh all the data
prove everybody's hypotheses for a lot
of Mike Johnson's and Tucker Carlson's
you know this just might show the need
for more dialogue with Putin after all
if maybe he only killed uh uh navali
because um you know we haven't been
being nice enough to him so I I I do
worry that people will uh you know cram
it into their own crazy preconceptions
of thing that said look this should
concentrate everybody's mind this is a
murderous guy he's murderous at the
national level he's murderous at the uh
at the personal level um and he's
murderous at the State uh institutional
level and you you know the United States
has to be more kininger than Johnson
about this and we just have to
you know put certain domestic
considerations aside and just pass that
supplemental um well uh you suggested
that maybe the Tuckers of the world
would show that this uh needs additional
dialogue I've got we've got we're doing
it live this morning Ben um Tucker is
right uh he's on stage right now at the
world government Summit 20124 let's just
I I don't exactly know what he said um
but uh let's just listen to it live
together I'll use the Devil's Advocate
but Advocate away yes okay I'll tell you
you should challenge in in in the rules
of an interview and you are a master in
in your in your business uh it's not for
me to give you a lecture about that but
you should challenge some ideas for
instance
uh you you didn't talk about freedom of
speech in in Russia you did not talk
about Naval about assassination
about about restrictions on opposition
in the coming uh elections I didn't talk
about the things that every other
American Media Outlet talks about
exclusively because those are covered
and because I have spent my life talking
to people who run countries in various
countries and have concluded the
following that every leader kills people
including my leader every leader kills
people some kill more than others
leadership requires killing people sorry
it's why I wouldn't want to be a leader
um that press restriction is universal
in the United States I know because I've
lived it I you know asked my former you
know I I've had a lot of jobs um and
I've done this for 34 years and I know
how it works and um there's more
censorship in Russia than there is in
the United States but there's a great
deal in the United States and so you
know at a certain point it's like people
can decide whether they think you know
what what countries they think are
better what systems they think are
better I just want to know what he
thinks that was the whole point yeah
okay leadership leadership requires
killing people leadership requires
killing people so I you know I wasn't
far off there um look um there is
nothing we can do about the Tuckers of
the world there is something we can do
about the Mike Johnson's of the world
and um that involves in the short term
um a maximum pressure campaign to get
him to hold this vote and I do hope that
the naali story if it's true
is uh will work as a significant arrow
in that quiver uh uh and I'm confident
that Naval would want that as well um
the second thing is that these people
really need to be removed from power and
and that's a you know a longer term
electoral uh thing but people who don't
understand that you need to uh stand up
to Vladimir
Putin really need to not not be in
power yeah you know what it reminds me
of is um just listening to that is
20 but I can't remember if it was during
the campaign in 2016 or maybe right
after he was elected president um Trump
does the interview with O'Reilly where
O'Reilly asks him about uh Putin and his
assassinations pure you think our
country is so innocent we've got a lot
of killers you think our country's so
innocent that mindset I I do think you
know it's just I'm struck there was the
interview this week with Marco where
he's talking to Jake Tapper and he's
like yeah Trump says some crazy things
he's not part of the Council on Foreign
Relations but you can't you know take
that all seriously and and just how
wrong that worldview is and and how much
the Trump World View that that the
United States is not great that the
United States is not any different from
any of these other countries um uh in
motivation uh it is a very
uh debased view of the country a very
dark view of the country and it has
infected clearly a a huge portion of the
Republican party like the party that
used to feel that we were you know the
hope of the world now oh you think we're
so innocent oh everybody's a killer
everybody uh everybody murders their
political Foos we have denes duza today
saying that Trump is Naval that that
Biden is poop and that that he's being
persecuted not just dest Jus is saying
that uh Ben here's Lee zeldon Lee zelden
one of the good Republicans famous
moderate Republicans yeah um as the
world reflects on the murder of Alexi
naly at the hands of Putin it's worth
remembering the Democrats are actively
doing Biden's bidding as they also try
to imprison his chief political opponent
Donald
Trump I mean this just disgusting moral
equ equivalence has like has infected so
much of the party that I I just how do
you disinfect like I is is a
disinfectant even possible once you've
got to this dark of a place
so in I mean there I think there's two
answers to that and one is one relates
to the criminal justice system and the
other relates to the political culture
and the answer with respect to the
political system is that the US uh or
sorry the answer with respect to the
justice system is that if you can watch
the proceedings against naali and watch
the proceedings against Donald Trump and
see them as equivalent then you are uh
really really misunderstanding both the
Russian justice system and its function
and the American justice system and its
function these are it's a very that's a
very nice way to put that I would right
I would say the the Russian justice
system is is a fukan nightmare it is an
instrument of the repressive powers of
the state and nothing more than that uh
the American justice system has its
problems um but you know Donald Trump is
getting four Fair trials in four
different jurisdictions supervised by
four different judges state and federal
and he will have an ample opportunity to
prove himself innocent of each and every
one of the 91 uh felony counts that has
been directed against him and by the way
I don't believe he'll actually he may
not be convicted of all of them right
they they're actually in doubt the
burden is actually on the prosecution
and so I think if you you know if part
of the answer to your question has to
lie in the system playing out and we get
to the end we get to him being convicted
on X number and acquitted or dropped on
y number and people get to look at the
result and say do I think that result
has Integrity the answer in the
political system is way harder in in my
view because I don't know how do you
convince a political culture that it has
Integrity that its systems have
integrity and in the face of a
Relentless multi Year campaign of
delegitimization that includes you know
Desh duza saying these things and Lee
zeldon saying these things uh how do
you how do you keep people having
confidence in the fact that the US
system and the Russian system are not
the same that Joe Biden isn't out there
murdering his political opponents by the
way he's supposed to be too old and
scile to be out there killing people um
uh you know how do you convince there he
his own son is being investigated by the
doj right it is hard and this is the
part that is so frustrating and and just
when you think about the disintegration
for another interview that might be
coming down people's Pike in a in in a
while I I was rewatching the Palin
kurick interview last night and um and
for as bad as Sarah Palin was in that
interview and it was astonishing how bad
she was upon rewatch it was kind of
worse than I remembered really and uh
still the the talking points were much
more in the mainstream of where the
American Pol is she talks about Reagan
and The Shining City on the hill when
the issue of American leadership comes
up she talks about the threat from Putin
she talks about worries about climate
change and you fast forward to this week
and Sarah Palin did you see this Sarah
Palin put puts up a meme that is um it's
it's like Tucker and and Putin's face uh
superimposed on two people that are
smiling looking over a a grave and on
the gravestone it says the media and the
Democrats and it's it's like this woman
who was on the vice presidential ticket
whatever you think about her you know
how how much of a clown she's become now
is not someone with no influence and
she's just a couple of days ago putting
out like literally cheerleading the idea
that that Vladimir Putin should can is
is murdering journalists and and days
after she does that he he murders
allegedly the opposition leader
political leader and we're already
seeing in the response wagon circling
around this right like if you if that
something that Stark if that Stark of a
foot imagine if you put out a joke about
killing somebody and then two days later
it happened you know if that doesn't
shake you into reality you know what is
going to shake these people nothing well
I I also think you know after after mass
shootings when there's a political
violence to the mass shooting we always
you know have a okay is it Bernie
Sanders's fault that somebody shot up
the Congressional baseball game is it
Donald Trump's fault that there was a
Pulse Nightclub shooting right um I
don't I never know how to think about
those questions but I do think that we
should ask a causal question here about
Tucker's trip um which is you know if
you're Vladimir Putin and you're you've
kind of made a decision that you'll kill
naali at the most opportune moment but
you do want to time it because there's
going to be some
backlash and then Congress Congress goes
on a four month stall on Ukraine Aid and
so you really have this perception that
the American political system is
weakening in its resolve uh to confront
you and then in the middle of that one
of the most prominent Russia apologists
in the in in the United States second
only to Donald Trump himself shows up in
MOS kiss your ass really maybe first can
we play let's let's just listen to
Tucker I'm bad like let's just listen to
Tucker at the grocery store I'm sure I'm
sure most people have heard it but we
should just let's just all do it
together because really it should be a
communal experience Jason can we hear
Tucker at a Russian grocery store if you
take people's standard of living and you
tank it through filth and crime and
inflation and they literally can't buy
the groceries they want at that point
maybe it matters less what you say or
whether you're a good person or a bad
person you're wrecking people's lives in
their country and and that's what our
leaders have done to us and coming to a
Russian grocery store the heart of evil
and seeing what things cost and how
people live it will radicalize you
against our leaders that's how I feel
anyway
radicalized we're not making any of this
up by the way at all not making it up
Ben not making it up in a country where
25% of the population doesn't have
running water by the way um look I don't
think it's unreasonable to ask the
question
did Vladimir Putin take the current
posture of the
GOP uh both in Congress and with
Tucker's visit and with you know
everything Sarah Palin's doing you put
it all together did he take it as a sign
that this is a good moment to to do this
I I don't I don't know how to evaluate
that but I do wake up this morning
wondering about it my response to that
is kind of like doesn't that give too
much agent to Putin is is is is really
is maybe the Heart of Darkness in all of
us not all not not all of us the whole
country but is not the Heart of Darkness
in in Tucker did did not Donald Trump
reveal a darkness that was already
within because of course but but my my
point is when we act like shills for him
he takes it as a signal he takes it as
an these are these are not things that
don't affect his thinking of what he can
get away with when you stand up to him
uh he takes that as a signal when you
pucker your lips and kiss his ass he
takes that as a
signal he's getting a lot of good
signals heting a lot of good signals all
right I want to move on you're the Trump
trials man we have two Trump trials
updates but I just I like it is so
enraging
to the the Tucker thing as we sit here
and listen to it and discuss it in the
context of nality you know I I've I've
been watching all these Tucker videos
and kind of laughing at him right
because there's there's something funny
about it like the absurdity of Tucker
this supposed man of the people
who's apparently never heard of the idea
that of of the grocery cart machines
where you put in a quarter and and you
have to you have to put in the quarter
again on the back end in order to put it
back like like he's never had a paid
grocery cart he's never seen that before
never been to an airport I guess um so
there is some absurdity in Tu and you
know Tucker going into one uh Metro
station be like wow this is pretty
Russia must be great but yeah I I just
want to point out that those people have
been being
impressed with those Metro stations you
know since the Stalin era and uh in in a
fashion that they then impute to Russia
in general and miss things like the
great Ukraine ukan famine right because
they're really impressed with a subway
station like this is really old
that he's falling for and um and yeah
people in the nice parts of Moscow live
way better than people in the rest of
the largest country in the world yeah he
should go visit the Nebraska or the
Maine or the Alabama of Russia and see
what see what what he think should drive
a 100 miles out of Moscow 50 miles out
of Moscow yeah but the thing is um he
isn't falling for it and that's that's
the thing he's not falling for it like
Tucker is a very smart person um it's
very evident in his writing and and and
back when he did interviews that were
not the type of interview that he did
last week like he is a malevolent person
that has decided that um out of either
grievance towards his fellow Americans
for some reason or out of uh uh hatred
that he did not you know that he does
not get the treatment among the American
Elites that he wishes that he did or
just out of desire for money or fame or
because he's a troll or because
he's a niist whatever what whatever
motivations you want to impute on it is
a person that knows better and is now
out there being the number one
propagandist for a just homicidal Maniac
that just murdered his political
opponents and that is uh uh uh
kidnapping children that has invaded
another country and like the the lack of
just total rage and disgust among the
Republican Elites and and Tucker's other
friends and allies is the thing that is
like the most to me disheartening about
that because the response should like I
and I'm guilty of this the response
should not be laughter or or you know
what it should be rage it's ra it's
enraging I I completely agree and I do
also agree with uh your friend Carville
that mocking them is actually important
um thank you for listening on my first
week no I I I listen to them all um and
look I believe in mockery I'm the guy
who projects you know body on on
embassies around the world um I think
mockery is a really important thing it
plays an important role but you don't
confuse the mockery with your internal
emotional response because the mockery
is what you're what you're projecting no
pun intended at them the rage is what's
driving the mockery and you know I have
to I spend a lot of time with real
ukrainians and I find myself
increasingly having to explain the
behavior of my country to them and they
are not like Tucker and Trump they
actually believe in America in this yes
in this
really pardon me innocent way we're the
people who confronted the Soviet Union
we're the people who organize NATO we're
democracy and you know relatively
non-corrupt capitalism We're The Shield
of the democratic world and try to
explain Tucker
Carlson and Donald Trump and why why
does Donald Trump hate Ukraine to a
table full of ukrainians and it has
something to do right it has something
to do with
barisma personal pettiness right it's
this little little while they are
trying to keep their country independent
and trying to get 20,000 kids back back
and not lose as many people as they are
as they can save and you know it's a
very enraging thing when you've had had
to have that conversation for the 50th
time and yeah you know half of the the
half of the country's behavior in this
space not half 30% is really inexcusable
and you know as somebody who spends a
lot of time trying to help ukrainians
navigate our crazy political system just
try to try to explain it to a
hypothetical 22-year-old Ukrainian kid
who's uh who who doesn't understand like
what Fox News is or who Tucker Carlson
is just try and it's sad it's sad we're
running out of time and just the thing
is um the inverse of that was just was
once true it was one of the most
inspiring things when I was working for
McCain Mark Salter as speech writer you
know would tell me stories of traveling
mcain all over the world and and it was
these types of people the 22y old
ukrainians uh the 22y old Georgians uh
people in countries that had uh
autocrats of their own and they knew
they KN you know the McCain brand the
American brand it meant something it
meant that oh they will be on our side
they will be on our side and now these
people have to feel like no there's a
big portion of the country that's on the
side of the of the murder and the death
spot okay uh this is you're supposed to
be here for Trump trials two very brief
Trump trial updates that um I just want
to uh get in um yesterday uh Trump
appointed special counsel this is
related to the topic at hand David Weiss
um uh is charging Alexander smaroff I
feel like the the script writers are a
little on the nose here um uh by naming
him smear off age 43 with ly to the FBI
and creating false records he was
arrested also a little on the nose at
Harry Reid international airport in Las
Vegas um what he's charged with uh Ben
is uh is basically
fabricating um the the notion that uh he
was talking about barisma business deal
dealings with Biden with with Hunter and
with Joe Biden when Biden was vice
president right I guess and and who
knows what's true at this point if a
liar is a liar but at some point you
know there there was evidence that they
had spoken about it after you know
during the period when Trump was
president when Biden was a private
citizen uh but he fabricated uh to
investigators the idea that these
conversations were going when Biden was
vice president obviously a big
difference um and so uh you know this
guy was mentioned I believe on the
Hannity Show 82 time maybe not by name
but like this claim was was mentioned on
Hannity 82 92 times something like that
he's been a star witness for comr
another one bites the dust here on the
hunter Biden investigation yeah yeah so
I have two things to say about this and
I have not followed this case especially
closely because I was glued to the
television for the fonny Willis show
yesterday um but um look there's two
really important points first of all the
prosecutor who has brought this case is
the same prosecutor who's Prosecuting uh
Hunter Biden it's the special special
counsel David Weiss so in other words
this is somebody who's trying to make a
case against
Biden and this witness fabricates this
stuff and he ends up Prosecuting him uh
so you know that'll give you an idea of
you know this is a presumably a
receptive audience to somebody who's uh
you know got a claim of of a demand of a
big bribe from from uh somebody about
Hunter and Joe Biden and yet uh he turns
around and prosecutes him that'll give
you an idea of how credible this story
was um the second thing is you know the
entire there there's two sides of the
hunter Biden Story one is the side that
you know Hunter Biden was an addict and
uh engaged in all sorts of shady stuff
and traded on his father's name and uh
you know got himself into a fair bit of
trouble legal trouble um the second
aspect of it was that this was somehow a
larger story about Joe Biden than about
Hunter Biden yeah and the different
bricks in that story have all turned out
to be um and it doesn't stop
comr from talking about the Biden crime
family it doesn't talk about um but you
know no component of it ends up being
true for the simple reason I think that
Joe Biden isn't corrupt what whatever
else he is he's old he's uh he's um you
know he is what he is and he appears to
have mishandled classified information
but he's not a he's not a corrupt guy
taking bribes um and so what happens is
they get very excited about these people
who have some story to tell and then
they turn out to be charlatans or they
turned out to not tell the stories that
they claim they tell or the um and it's
a very consistent pattern now over time
that should make you be uh real careful
with the uh you know Hanes and comr of
the world who are trying to make Hunter
Biden be about Joe Biden and this was
obvious from the start the barisma thing
was so obvious from the start the whole
the whole conspiracy theory I've been
writing about this for years uh we could
do a whole episode maybe we will this
year on the absurdity of the barisma
conspiracy okay um the Fon Willis
situation has been so depressing and
dispiriting to me that I was not able to
watch it um just because I'm like I hate
anything that that gives Donald Trump a
hammer to beat us with uh us being the
pro- Democracy Pro rule of law side of
things so we've got about three to five
minutes here so since I was too
depressed to watch and you were glued to
it I'm just going to put a quarter in
the in the machine and let you kind of
get get us up to speed
well
so the bottom line uh the hearing is
still going on today and it is a mark of
my uh deep uh respect for you that I am
here rather than watching it now um this
was the best like my babysitter during
OJ she would never she didn't turn she
didn't turn off Court TV back in uh for
for like an entire week this is better
TV than than Court TV at its best during
the OJ trial um uh for so look fonny
Willis has a a bit of a problem but I I
think she actually solved most of it
herself yesterday um uh she had this
relationship with uh a guy she had hired
as special prosecutor in this case
Nathan Wade Nathan Wade took the stand
yesterday the issue is whether there's
some conflict of interest as a result of
their financial Arrangements through
this affair he took the stand and was I
thought completely
incredible um claimed that he had gone
they had gone on vacation together um
but you know she'd paid him back for
everything in cash um and
um the court also heard testimony from a
former friend of fonnie Willis who's
apartment she had taken over who claimed
that Wade and Willis had been dating
much earlier than they've acknowledged
and the significance of that would be
that it's much worse if she hired the
person she was sleeping with than if she
hired somebody and then they later in a
context of a professional relationship
started to have a romantic relationship
so things around two o'clock in the
afternoon look really bad for fonnie and
then she charges into the courtroom and
demands to
testify and I have never seen somebody
take over a courtroom like she did she
she comes in she sits down and she talks
about why she always keeps cash around
her apartment and she is as compelling
as he was apparently evasive and I think
by the end of the day she had really
saved the situation
um and I don't know what's going on
there today or whether the situation is
going to be uh end up being bad again
but I do have the impression that there
is no basis to disqualify her after both
Nathan Wade's and her sworn testimony
and so that's a little tentative because
like they are literally in court right
now um but I think um I think this is
going to end up being a bit of a tempest
in a teapot but it was a heck of a
tempest Tempest a great an entertaining
Tempest I mean it's got some Parry Mason
it's got some General Hospital it's got
some House of
Cards great daytime television I'm gonna
take your word for this but look you we
got to have our our you know p's and q's
in order here Ben you know I like and
this is so I'm thinking about this
through the comms guy hat we're giving
him a lot of fodder to bleet there's a
lot of bleeding fodder right now and
there's a some delays we're giving him
some delaying opportunities and some
bleeding fod there is no doubt that if
fonny Willis had come to me and say Wht
us you know you're you're a good Gray
beard on this sh not that I have a Gray
beard but you like should I have an
affair with the special prosecutor and
reimburse him for joint travel with wads
of cash I would have said no part of
that sounds like a good plan um but that
you know and like you'll it's going to
come out you're going to get your ass
kicked over this you're gonna have
litigation over this and it's going to
let Trump change the subject that's what
I would have said but she didn't consult
me in advance about this neither did
Nathan Wade he also didn't ask me how he
should answer his divorce uh
interrogatories so like nobody consulted
me on this part I would have suggested
they handle it differently um that's not
the question on the table right now the
question on the table right now is is
she gonna get disqualified from the case
and is Donald Trump gonna gonna reap a
real uh winfall from this and I I think
you could eat these words but I think
the answer is no Ben wit us thank you
for coming out of the bullpen today it's
like uh all my baseball references are
20 years old I don't watch baseball
anymore but your Mariana Rivera or 30
years old Dennis eesley you know coming
out of the pen and just doing a
wonderful job Goose gosage closing out
the week with us and uh I'm very very
grateful for your expertise and for
doing this and we'll be talking to you
[Music]
soon