2,422 videos 1,389,747,653 views US Joined Aug 30, 2018
Charlie Kirk is the Founder and President of Turning Point USA, the largest and fastest growing conservative youth activist organization in the country with over 250,000 student members, over 150 full-time staff, and a presence on over 2,000 high school and college campuses nationwide. Charlie is also the Chairman of Students for Trump, which aims to activate one million new college voters on campuses in battleground states in the lead up to the 2020 presidential election. His social media reaches over 100 million people per month and according to Axios, he is one of the "top 10 most engaged" Twitter handles in the world. He is also the host of “The Charlie Kirk Show,” which regularly ranks among the top news shows on Apple podcast charts.
Charlie Kirk on Challenging Your Own Beliefs and the Value of Classical Education at Oxford
Charlie Kirk addresses Oxford University students on the importance of understanding opposing viewpoints and engaging with classical conservative literature. Kirk discusses how students should know what conservatives believe by reading thinkers like C.S. Lewis, Edmund Burke, and Russell Kirk. He also addresses criticism about lacking a college degree and how credentials have become barriers to serious dialogue rather than markers of genuine understanding.
When an Oxford student asked what questions would most effectively challenge Kirk's core beliefs, he expressed appreciation for the thoughtful approach. Kirk emphasized a principle he considers fundamental to intellectual discourse: always enter conversations believing you might be wrong and that you might learn something. He praised Oxford as a prestigious institution that has produced some of history's greatest thinkers, including J.R.R. Tolkien and C.S. Lewis.
The Decline of Classical Curriculum in American Universities
Kirk expressed concern about what he sees as a de-emphasis of foundational thinkers and writers that were once embedded within the core curriculum at institutions like Oxford. He contrasted the current American educational landscape with what he believes was once a more balanced intellectual environment. According to Kirk, conservative students in American universities must engage with left-wing ideas to progress through their education, but the reverse is rarely true for liberal students.
Essential Reading for Understanding Conservatism
Kirk challenged intellectually honest students on the left to know what conservatives believe better than conservatives themselves. He provided a reading list for those willing to engage seriously with conservative thought:
C.S. Lewis's Mere Christianity
Edmund Burke's works
Russell Kirk's writings
Milton Friedman's economic theories
Kirk stressed that this reading should be done with respect and genuine engagement, not merely as a cursory exercise. He pointed out that right-wing students have been required to reckon and reconcile with left-wing ideas throughout their university experience, creating what he sees as an intellectual imbalance.
The Credential Barrier
A student from Michigan State University, who expressed distaste for political labels, raised a question about whether Kirk's lack of a college degree restricts his influence compared to figures like Jordan Peterson. Kirk acknowledged this as a legitimate barrier he must overcome. He admitted that criticism suggesting he cannot engage in serious dialogue due to his lack of university education represents an argument from authority.
However, Kirk reframed this challenge as motivation. The expectation that he prove himself despite lacking credentials drives him to learn more, dive deeper, and develop better understanding of complex ideas. He views this barrier as emblematic of a larger problem within academia.
The Problem with Credentialism
Kirk argued that the emphasis on credentials reveals a fundamental flaw in the current state of higher education. If a college degree functions primarily as an expensive, time-intensive credential designed to make people take you more seriously rather than as genuine intellectual formation, then the system has lost its way. Kirk expressed preference for evaluating people based on what they do and what they know rather than where they went to school.
This tension between credentials and capability represents what Kirk sees as the downfall of modern academia—a shift from valuing demonstrated knowledge and achievement to simply requiring expensive institutional validation before someone can be considered worthy of serious engagement.
