Charlie Kirk and Frank Turek Examine Evidence for Christianity and the Implications of Roe v Wade Reversal

Enjoying this? Share it with someone who needs to see it.

Up Next

Charlie Kirk and Seth Gruber on Why the Church Must Stand Against Abortion in America

Charlie Kirk and Seth Gruber on Why the Church Must Stand Against Abortion in America

1:13:23

Charlie Kirk Destroys the Myth That America Was Not Founded on Christian Principles With Historical Evidence

Charlie Kirk Destroys the Myth That America Was Not Founded on Christian Principles With Historical Evidence

5:38

Charlie Kirk on Church Persecution, Civil Society, and Fighting for Truth in a Broken America

Charlie Kirk on Church Persecution, Civil Society, and Fighting for Truth in a Broken America

1:31:37

Charlie Kirk and Frank Turek Examine Evidence for Christianity and the Implications of Roe v Wade Reversal

Charlie Kirk hosts renowned Christian apologist Frank Turek at Dream City Church for a discussion on the rational case for Christianity, the archaeological evidence supporting biblical truth, and the Supreme Court's reversal of Roe v Wade. They explore how the decision represents decades of prayer and activism from leaders like Billy Graham, Rush Limbaugh, and Antonin Scalia. The conversation addresses common objections to faith, the historical reliability of the Gospels, and why social justice ideology threatens biblical principles of equality under God.

Categories: Charlie's Faith
August 23, 2022

A Victory Decades in the Making

Charlie Kirk opens the evening with an emotional reflection on the presentation just shown about America, describing the tension between being moved by the nation's beauty and feeling angry about its current destruction. He emphasizes that while America is the greatest nation in history, it requires citizen action to preserve and properly change it.

Kirk announces exciting developments for Turning Point Academy, including two new branches, homeschool curriculum, and pod schooling options. The vision is to eliminate any excuse parents might have for keeping their children in government schools by providing accessible alternatives nationwide.

The Supreme Court Decision and Multi-Generational Faithfulness

Kirk celebrates the Supreme Court's recent decision, noting it represents a lagging indicator of fights that happened generations ago. He credits the reversal to 40 or 50 years of prayer and fasting from churches and leaders including Pastor Tommy, Billy Graham, Rush Limbaugh, Antonin Scalia, and Phyllis Schlafly. He acknowledges that important victories take years to achieve, noting that these leaders are now smiling from heaven, vindicated in their persistence.

Kirk proposes a two-part test for churches regarding the Roe v Wade reversal: First, did the pastor mention it happened? Second, is the church now stepping up to expand services, charities, and nonprofits to support women bringing life into the world? Dream City Church passed both tests. He emphasizes that Christians must now support organizations like Choices in Arizona with time, treasure, resources, and prayer.

Evidence from Texas and the Church's Opportunity

Kirk shares data from Texas showing that when the six-week abortion ban went into place, abortions decreased by 70 to 80 percent, debunking the claim that outlawing abortion doesn't decrease it. He frames this as one of the greatest evangelistic opportunities the church has ever had—to welcome and support women without judgment or condemnation.

He credits the appointment of Supreme Court justices Amy Coney Barrett, Neil Gorsuch, and Brett Kavanaugh to someone who lived a colorful life from New York City, once pro-choice himself, who came down a golden escalator and actually did what he said he would do. Kirk notes that God can use anybody for any reason, and these appointments bore fruit in protecting the unborn.

Introducing Frank Turek

Kirk introduces Frank Turek, explaining how he first discovered him on local television in Spokane, Washington, while staying in a hotel after speaking at Washington State University. Turek was presenting an articulate case for why atheism is irrational and making the case for the resurrection. His entire podcast and show is called "I Don't Have Enough Faith to Be an Atheist," which is also the title of his book.

Turek visits college campuses taking questions about Christianity and atheism, making him one of the most gifted apologists of our time. He has a new book called "Hollywood Heroes" and regularly exchanges texts and dinners with Kirk.

The Rational Case Against Atheism

When Kirk plays devil's advocate asking why atheism isn't reasonable, Turek explains that atheists now claim they simply "lack a belief in God" to avoid the burden of proof. He responds by asking them directly: Do you agree God exists, disagree, or not know? They always admit they don't know, revealing they're actually agnostic.

Turek argues that we know God by His effects, reasoning from effect back to cause just as scientists do. The universe exploding into being out of nothing requires a cause that is spaceless, timeless, immaterial, powerful, personal, and intelligent. When audiences consider these attributes, they naturally think of God.

He acknowledges this could initially be any generic god, like what Thomas Jefferson referenced in the Declaration of Independence. But continued investigation of evidence, particularly for the resurrection, reveals this is the same being who walked out of the tomb 1,989 years ago and in whose divine nature created the universe.

The Truth Quest Versus the Happiness Quest

Turek shares that when encountering hostile atheists on college campuses, he asks: "If Christianity were true, would you become a Christian?" Atheists have stood before hundreds of people and answered no. This reveals they're not on a truth quest but a happiness quest, believing whatever they think will make them happy.

The problem, Turek explains, is that pursuing happiness without truth works short-term but leads to disaster long-term. True contentment and happiness only comes by going straight through truth, and Jesus is the truth. Most people looking for God are like criminals looking for a cop—they're not actually interested.

Turek conducts an audience survey asking people to think of someone they'd like to see become Christian, then asks whether that person is on a relentless pursuit of truth or apathetic and hostile. The overwhelming majority indicate apathy or hostility. His advice: love them, pray for them, plant seeds, and wait. When tragedy strikes—and it will—your phone will ring, because they won't call their atheist friend who can only say there's no rhyme or reason to life.

Addressing Subjectivism and Relativism

Kirk identifies subjectivism as a virus infecting young minds, referencing C.S. Lewis's warnings about this danger. Young people return from college saying "that's my truth" or "everyone has their own truth." This underlies the transgender movement's claim to different material truths.

Turek responds by pointing out that "there is no truth" is itself a self-defeating statement. If someone says there's no truth, ask if that's true. If they say all truth is relative, ask if that's a relative truth. If they say "I have my truth and you have your truth," ask if that's the truth. These statements defeat themselves by failing to meet their own standards.

There's no such thing as "your truth" or "my truth"—there's just the truth. Claiming to have your own truth is like claiming to have your own math. The idea is currently running the government, but it's still absurd.

Judging Rightly

Turek addresses the common objection "don't judge" by noting it's itself a judgment. Jesus didn't say don't judge—He said "judge not lest you be judged by the same standard." Before removing the speck from your brother's eye, He calls us hypocrites and tells us to remove the log from our own eye first, then we'll be better able to help our brother. This is a command on how to judge, not a prohibition against judging.

The people telling us not to judge are often the most judgmental people in society. Turek jokes about the warm welcomes he receives at Berkeley, Stanford, and Boulder.

Moral Law Requires a Moral Lawgiver

Kirk asks about the societal and moral implications of not believing in God or absolute moral law. Turek explains this is another effect pointing to God as cause. The moral law written on our hearts—what Thomas Jefferson called self-evident and Paul described as written on Gentile hearts—points to a moral lawgiver.

Without God, nothing is ultimately right or wrong. Everything becomes opinion—your opinion against Hitler's or Putin's. But we know murder and rape aren't matters of opinion. They're objectively morally wrong, which means there must be a standard of rightness defining goodness, with deviations from that standard being evil.

Turek considers this the most powerful argument for God's existence today because everyone—atheist, agnostic, Christian, Muslim—believes certain things are morally right and wrong.

The Reality Crisis

Kirk describes an entire generation plagued by inability to differentiate real from unreal, living in what he calls a "plague of imagination versus reality." Young people stare at screens seeing only photons all day—video games, pornography, metaverse interactions with friends who don't truly exist. When they encounter the real world, which isn't as stimulating as video games, their entire neural profile is disrupted.

Turek responds by noting many things we believe in we cannot see: laws of logic, the mind itself, justice, love. He references his debates with Christopher Hitchens, the brilliant British atheist who defined love as "a chemical." Turek's response: "Don't say that to your wife." Love is an immaterial virtue grounded in God's nature.

We believe in gravity without seeing it—we see its effects. We believe in George Washington without seeing him because of the effects he left behind. The same is true of Jesus—we believe because of the effects He left behind that are best explained by the God-man who rose from the dead 1,989 years ago.

Addressing Miracles and Biblical Reliability

When Kirk presents the objection that the Bible contains inaccuracies and miracles that seem unbelievable, Turek first asks what evidence they have for inaccuracy. When they cite miracles like Jonah or Noah, he asks if they believe in miracles at all.

The greatest miracle in the Bible is Genesis 1:1—"In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth." If that verse is true, every other verse is at least possible. Even atheists admit evidence for this first verse by acknowledging space-time and matter had a beginning out of nothing.

Miracles must be rare to get our attention. If resurrections occurred routinely, Christ's resurrection would be meaningless. Christianity doesn't require miracles to occur today to be true—if the universe exploded into being out of nothing and Jesus rose from the dead, Christianity is true.

The Reliability of the Gospel Accounts

Kirk asks about trusting Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John despite their age. Turek identifies this as chronological snobbery—assuming old means wrong. If all New Testament manuscripts were stacked, they'd reach over a mile high because scribes meticulously copied them. There's no real doubt about what the originals said.

The more interesting question is whether the originals tell the truth. Here Turek introduces the principle of embarrassment: if something is embarrassing to the author, it's probably true. People lie to make themselves look good, not bad.

The Women at the Tomb

Kirk highlights that women discovered the empty tomb—a detail that validates the Gospels' truthfulness. Turek explains that the New Testament is filled with embarrassing details the authors never would have invented. The male writers depict themselves as cowards who ran away, while women bravely went to the tomb.

No man inventing this story would write that he was hiding in fear while women discovered the empty tomb. In that culture, women's testimony wasn't considered equal to men's. If fabricating the story, only men would be first witnesses. That all four Gospels say women were first—including formerly demon-possessed Mary Magdalene—proves they're not making it up.

Turek shares a woman once told him Jesus appeared to women first because He wanted to get the story out. Men come home from work and say little—there could be a nuclear explosion and he won't mention it. You'll see it on the news before hearing from him.

Debunking Alternative Theories

Kirk presents alternative theories: Jesus wasn't actually dead, His body was stolen, or it was a vast conspiracy. Turek quotes Justice Antonin Scalia's sarcastic comment about the "bumbling evangelists" inventing the resurrection to get themselves martyred—highlighting the absurdity.

Why would disciples steal the body and claim resurrection to get themselves kicked out of synagogues, beaten, tortured, and killed? Roman guards were on duty, and their explanation—disciples stole the body while guards slept—is absurd. First, sleeping on watch meant execution. Second, how would sleeping guards know what happened? Third, why steal the body only to die for a lie?

The Bias Objection

Addressing claims that New Testament writers were biased believers, Turek notes all were Jews (except Luke) who believed they were God's chosen people. Why would they invent a resurrection story they didn't believe possible? They considered claiming to be God blasphemy and didn't believe in mid-history resurrection—only end-time resurrection per Daniel 12.

Jay Warner Wallace, a cold-case homicide detective who's been on Dateline more than any other detective, applies his skills to Jesus's death in "Cold Case Christianity." He identifies only three murder motivations: sex, money, or power. Did the apostles get popular with women? No. Money? No. Power? No—they were persecuted. Paul had power as a Pharisee but lost it becoming a believer. Why say it was true if it wasn't? Because it really happened.

Christianity Preceded the Bible

Turek makes a striking point: Christianity isn't true because documents we call the Bible say so. Christianity would be true if the Bible never existed. Thousands of Christians existed before one New Testament line was written because they witnessed the resurrected Jesus and wrote it down later.

Christianity didn't originate with a book but with an event—the resurrection. The New Testament writers didn't create the resurrection; the resurrection created the New Testament writers. They went to their deaths saying it was true.

Legislating Morality, Not Religion

As the discussion shifts to political implications, particularly after the Roe v Wade reversal, people claim "this is not a theocracy" and "you can't impose your religion." Turek clarifies: we're not imposing religion or legislating where, when, how, or if to worship. We're legislating morality, and all laws legislate morality—every law declares one behavior right and the opposite wrong.

The claim that women have a right to abortion is itself a moral position. On abortion, Turek offers the shortest response: "If your solution to your problem is a dead baby, you have the wrong solution." There is never a solution if it requires a dead baby.

Truth Versus Power

Kirk asks about the death of God and its political implications, particularly regarding socialism and totalitarianism. Turek explains that without self-evident truths grounded in our Creator, there are only two ways to govern: by truth and principle, or by power.

The left governs purely by power, not principle. They will shut down debate and impose their will because they can't defend their view. Without God and self-evident truths, there's no way to say anyone has a right to anything—everything is opinion. So they impose their opinions using power.

Question and Answer: Teaching Children Biblical Truth

The children's pastor at Dream City Church asks why it's important to communicate to children that the Bible is true. Turek emphasizes showing why it's true, not just claiming it. He believes the Jonah and Noah stories because Jesus believed them and mentioned them. His personal policy: if someone predicts and accomplishes his own resurrection, he trusts whatever that person says.

It's on Jesus's authority that the Bible is inerrant. Jesus said the entire Old Testament was God's word and promised the New Testament. The whole thing is contingent on Jesus rising from the dead. As Paul said in 1 Corinthians 15, if Jesus hasn't risen, our faith is in vain.

Kirk adds that learning biology and physics strengthened his faith. The complexity of human design makes unintelligent design patently insane. Our systems—brain, conscious and unconscious mind, autonomous functions like digestion, breathing, blood flow, heartbeat—working together without conscious thought is miraculous. Saying this came through accident or dice roll isn't just illogical.

The human being itself is the great miracle standing in front of us that we're choosing to ignore. If this can be designed, then the Red Sea can part, water can be walked on, disease can be cured.

Reaching Grandchildren When Parents Don't Believe

A grandmother asks about teaching grandchildren about Jesus when the parents aren't interested. Turek acknowledges this is difficult, suggesting talking more to the parents. He quotes C.S. Lewis: Christianity is either the most important fact in the universe or it's irrelevant—one thing it can't be is moderately important.

If Christianity is true—if Jesus rose from the dead and trusting Him means forgiveness and eternity with loved ones—what could be more important? If it's not true, it's irrelevant. Turek asks people, including his own kids, "If it were true, would you become a Christian?"

The problem is that even homes with fathers present see average teenage boys spending only 30 minutes weekly in meaningful conversation with fathers while spending 44 hours watching TV, surfing the internet, or playing video games. Which has more influence? Parents must make concerted efforts using resources from crossexamine.org, TPUSA Faith, and Dream City schools.

The Dopamine Crisis

Kirk addresses what he calls the dopamine crisis affecting young people. He's received thousands of emails about depressed, anxious kids and grandkids. Beyond spiritual dimensions, there's a chemical component being missed.

Dopamine is God's reward chemical meant to incentivize pushing harder and working harder. It's released through chocolate, cocaine, amphetamines, highly addictive video games, pornography, or social media fantasy. Fourteen to sixteen-year-olds have baseline dopamine release so altered they think they're living in a depressed state.

Their brain patterns are identical to 30-year-old burned-out drug addicts. They're handed digital pacifiers without realizing their entire risk-reward and purpose mechanisms are being completely burnt out.

Kirk encourages grandparents to be disagreeable if necessary. Those are your grandkids—offend your kids if needed. Grandparents can save a grandchild's life. Be the sweet one who gives candy, but profess truth. When chips are down and grandchildren need advice, they'll come to grandparents' house, not parents', especially when parents are teaching garbage. Always preach truth.

Navigating Social Justice Courses

A student at Grand Canyon University asks for advice on a required course called "Social Justice for Educators." Kirk expresses disappointment that GCU has "gone off the reservation," noting he's tired of them getting a hall pass when they've become very woke.

He explains that social justice is a Trojan horse. There's only justice to God—not environmental, racial, social, or gender justice. The worldview divides people into oppressor and oppressed. Courses will teach unbiblical woke terms like diversity, equity, inclusion, and white privilege.

Turek suggests asking three questions for any issue: First, "What do you mean by that?" to get definitions. Second, "How did you come to that conclusion?" to probe for evidence. Third, provide counter-evidence: "Have you ever considered there isn't social justice or racial justice or gender justice—just justice?"

These questions are available on the Cross Exam app (two words in the app store). It's easier to ask questions than answer them. Asking enough questions will drill down until the other person can't support their position because there's no intellectual justification.

Biblical Justice Versus Social Justice

Kirk emphasizes that Leviticus teaches that in dealings of justice, you neither favor the poor nor penalize the rich. Justice is blind—literally why Lady Justice is blindfolded in court proceedings. This biblical principle establishes equality under God.

Every time "social justice" is uttered, it's being used by revolutionaries to bring Marxism, post-modernism, secularism, and critical race theory into classrooms. Instead of tolerating this, we should discuss the Western idea of equality under law.

These courses often teach treating black kids differently than white kids—which is racism in education, not justice. The best way to be just is challenging people regardless of appearance, saying God has a future and prosperity for them, not subdividing them into different brackets based on melanin content.

America at its best always tried achieving that type of nation. Social justice narratives and courses seek to unravel it.

Video Transcript

Link copied to clipboard!